These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9611015)

  • 1. Effect of departmental policies on cesarean delivery rates: a community hospital experience.
    Poma PA
    Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 91(6):1013-8. PubMed ID: 9611015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of obstetrician characteristics on cesarean delivery rates. A community hospital experience.
    Poma PA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Jun; 180(6 Pt 1):1364-72. PubMed ID: 10368473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Vanishing forceps delivery.
    Poma PA
    Am J Perinatol; 1999; 16(5):227-31. PubMed ID: 10535615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The labor-adjusted cesarean section rate--a more informative method than the cesarean section "rate" for assessing a practitioner's labor and delivery skills.
    Elliott JP; Russell MM; Dickason LA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Jul; 177(1):139-43. PubMed ID: 9240597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cesarean delivery risk adjustment for regional interhospital comparisons.
    Glantz JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Dec; 181(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 10601924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Mount Sinai cesarean section reduction program: an update after 6 years.
    Myers SA; Gleicher N
    Soc Sci Med; 1993 Nov; 37(10):1219-22. PubMed ID: 8272900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Adjustment for case mix in comparisons of cesarean delivery rates: university versus community hospitals in Vermont.
    Whitsel AI; Capeless EC; Abel DE; Stuart GS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Nov; 183(5):1170-5. PubMed ID: 11084561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lowering the cesarean section rate in a private hospital: comparison of individual physicians' rates, risk factors, and outcomes.
    Lagrew DC; Adashek JA
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jun; 178(6):1207-14. PubMed ID: 9662303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Emergency peripartum hysterectomy in a tertiary obstetric center: 8-year evaluation.
    Habek D; Becareviç R
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2007; 22(2):139-42. PubMed ID: 17139172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rupture of a cesarean-scarred uterus: a community hospital experience.
    Poma PA
    J Natl Med Assoc; 2000 Jun; 92(6):295-300. PubMed ID: 10918765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A state-wide assessment of the obstetric, anesthesia, and operative team personnel who are available to manage the labors and deliveries and to treat the complications of women who attempt vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
    Lavin JP; DiPasquale L; Crane S; Stewart J
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Sep; 187(3):611-4. PubMed ID: 12237636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The experience with vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in a small rural community practice.
    Raynor BD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1993 Jan; 168(1 Pt 1):60-2. PubMed ID: 8420350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Variation in primary cesarean delivery rates by individual physician within a single-hospital laborist model.
    Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Gilbert SAB; Doyle R; Tong A; Carey JC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Apr; 214(4):531.e1-531.e6. PubMed ID: 26922481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do laborists improve delivery outcomes for laboring women in California community hospitals?
    Feldman DS; Bollman DL; Fridman M; Korst LM; El Haj Ibrahim S; Fink A; Gregory KD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 213(4):587.e1-587.e13. PubMed ID: 26026921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Introducing a daily obstetric audit: A solution to reduce the cesarean section rate?].
    Lasnet A; Jelen AF; Douysset X; Pons JC; Sergent F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2015 Jun; 44(6):550-7. PubMed ID: 25260605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician cesarean delivery rates and risk-adjusted perinatal outcomes.
    Li T; Rhoads GG; Smulian J; Demissie K; Wartenberg D; Kruse L
    Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 101(6):1204-12. PubMed ID: 12798526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of decreasing cesarean births on maternal age-, parity- and ethnicity-associated cesarean rates.
    Poma PA
    J Reprod Med; 2000 Mar; 45(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 10756499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Is a cesarean section rate of less than 12% possible in a tertiary level hospital center?].
    Blouin D
    Union Med Can; 1992; 121(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 1570665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Rethinking the cesarean rate: how pregnancy complications may affect interhospital comparisons.
    Korst LM; Gornbein JA; Gregory KD
    Med Care; 2005 Mar; 43(3):237-45. PubMed ID: 15725980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.