These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9611942)

  • 1. The effect of cuspal flexure on a buccal Class V restoration: a finite element study.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    J Dent; 1998 May; 26(4):361-7. PubMed ID: 9611942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of occlusal restoration on stresses around class V restoration interface: a finite-element study.
    Vasudeva G; Bogra P; Nikhil V; Singh V
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(2):295-302. PubMed ID: 21891903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The role of cuspal flexure in the development of abfraction lesions: a finite element study.
    Rees JS
    Eur J Oral Sci; 1998 Dec; 106(6):1028-32. PubMed ID: 9879915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of interfacial failure around a class V composite restoration analysed by the finite element method.
    Rees JS; Jacobsen PH
    J Oral Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 27(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 10672146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Finite element analysis of different restorative materials in primary teeth restorations.
    Sengul F; Gurbuz T; Sengul S
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2014 Sep; 15(3):317-22. PubMed ID: 25306152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cuspal flexure of teeth with composite restorations subjected to occlusal loading.
    González-López S; Vilchez Díaz MA; de Haro-Gasquet F; Ceballos L; de Haro-Muñoz C
    J Adhes Dent; 2007 Feb; 9(1):11-5. PubMed ID: 17432396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Marginal and internal adaptation of bulk-filled Class I and Cuspal coverage direct resin composite restorations.
    Stavridakis MM; Kakaboura AI; Ardu S; Krejci I
    Oper Dent; 2007; 32(5):515-23. PubMed ID: 17910230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficient 3D finite element analysis of dental restorative procedures using micro-CT data.
    Magne P
    Dent Mater; 2007 May; 23(5):539-48. PubMed ID: 16730058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.
    Arola D; Galles LA; Sarubin MF
    J Dent; 2001 Jan; 29(1):63-73. PubMed ID: 11137640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Investigation of polymerisation shrinkage strain, associated cuspal movement and microleakage of MOD cavities restored incrementally with resin-based composite using an LED light curing unit.
    Fleming GJ; Khan S; Afzal O; Palin WM; Burke FJ
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):97-103. PubMed ID: 16842899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of a restored maxillary second premolar tooth by using three-dimensional finite element method.
    Toparli M; Gökay N; Aksoy T
    J Oral Rehabil; 1999 Feb; 26(2):157-64. PubMed ID: 10080314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach.
    Lin CL; Chang CH; Ko CC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2001 Jun; 28(6):576-85. PubMed ID: 11422685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Premolar cuspal flexure as a function of restorative material and occlusal contact location.
    Magne P; Oganesyan T
    Quintessence Int; 2009 May; 40(5):363-70. PubMed ID: 19582240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A conservative approach to placing posterior composite resin restorations.
    Leinfelder KF
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1996 Jun; 127(6):743-8. PubMed ID: 8708275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class I and Class II restorations of resin composite: an FE analysis of the influence of modulus of elasticity on stresses generated by occlusal loading.
    Asmussen E; Peutzfeldt A
    Dent Mater; 2008 May; 24(5):600-5. PubMed ID: 17767951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cuspal flexure, depth-of-cure, and bond integrity of bulk-fill composites.
    Do T; Church B; Veríssimo C; Hackmyer SP; Tantbirojn D; Simon JF; Versluis A
    Pediatr Dent; 2014; 36(7):468-73. PubMed ID: 25514074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.