These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9612474)

  • 1. Population-based breast cancer screening: policy advice for a New Zealand screening programme. Breast Cancer Screening Policy Advisory Group.
    N Z Med J; 1998 Apr; 111(1064):138-42. PubMed ID: 9612474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
    Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
    N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
    Lynge E
    APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A survey of urban and rural participants in the Otago-Southland pilot breast cancer screening programme.
    Richardson AK; Elwood JM; McNoe B; Bang E
    N Z Med J; 1994 Feb; 107(971):36-8. PubMed ID: 8302502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: prospects for New Zealand.
    Skegg D; Paul C; Benson-Cooper D; Chetwynd J; Clarke A; Fitzgerald N; Gray A; St George I; Simpson A
    N Z Med J; 1988 Aug; 101(852):531-3. PubMed ID: 3045716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer detection rates, and standardised detection ratios for prevalence screening in the New Zealand breast cancer screening programme.
    Richardson A; Graham P; Brown T; Smale P; Cox B
    J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 15153320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospects for population colorectal cancer screening in New Zealand.
    Parry S; Richardson A; Green T; Marshall B; Bissett I; Bloomfield A; Chadwick V; Cunningham C; Findlay M; Greer B; McMenamin J; Strid J; Robertson G; Teague C
    N Z Med J; 2007 Jul; 120(1258):U2633. PubMed ID: 17653251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?
    Baker S; Wall M; Bloomfield A
    N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1221):U1628. PubMed ID: 16138166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
    Cox B
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recommendations on population screening for colorectal cancer in New Zealand. Members of the National Health Committee Working Party on Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer.
    N Z Med J; 1999 Jan; 112(1080):4-6. PubMed ID: 10073156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
    Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
    BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
    Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.
    Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening
    J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 16792825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
    Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [CBO guideline 'Breast cancer: screening and diagnosis'].
    Rutgers EJ; Tuut MK
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 11206120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
    Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
    Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
    Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
    Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
    Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Population screening for breast cancer: an interim assessment].
    van der Maas PJ
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1096-9. PubMed ID: 10876703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.