161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9612474)
1. Population-based breast cancer screening: policy advice for a New Zealand screening programme. Breast Cancer Screening Policy Advisory Group.
N Z Med J; 1998 Apr; 111(1064):138-42. PubMed ID: 9612474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mammography screening for breast cancer in Copenhagen April 1991-March 1997. Mammography Screening Evaluation Group.
Lynge E
APMIS Suppl; 1998; 83():1-44. PubMed ID: 9850674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A survey of urban and rural participants in the Otago-Southland pilot breast cancer screening programme.
Richardson AK; Elwood JM; McNoe B; Bang E
N Z Med J; 1994 Feb; 107(971):36-8. PubMed ID: 8302502
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mammographic screening for breast cancer: prospects for New Zealand.
Skegg D; Paul C; Benson-Cooper D; Chetwynd J; Clarke A; Fitzgerald N; Gray A; St George I; Simpson A
N Z Med J; 1988 Aug; 101(852):531-3. PubMed ID: 3045716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast cancer detection rates, and standardised detection ratios for prevalence screening in the New Zealand breast cancer screening programme.
Richardson A; Graham P; Brown T; Smale P; Cox B
J Med Screen; 2004; 11(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 15153320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prospects for population colorectal cancer screening in New Zealand.
Parry S; Richardson A; Green T; Marshall B; Bissett I; Bloomfield A; Chadwick V; Cunningham C; Findlay M; Greer B; McMenamin J; Strid J; Robertson G; Teague C
N Z Med J; 2007 Jul; 120(1258):U2633. PubMed ID: 17653251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast cancer screening for women aged 40 to 49 years--what does the evidence mean for New Zealand?
Baker S; Wall M; Bloomfield A
N Z Med J; 2005 Aug; 118(1221):U1628. PubMed ID: 16138166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of service screening on breast cancer mortality rates.
Cox B
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Aug; 17(4):306-11. PubMed ID: 18562953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Recommendations on population screening for colorectal cancer in New Zealand. Members of the National Health Committee Working Party on Population Screening for Colorectal Cancer.
N Z Med J; 1999 Jan; 112(1080):4-6. PubMed ID: 10073156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2003 Australian Breast Health Survey: survey design and preliminary results.
Villanueva EV; Jones S; Nehill C; Favelle S; Steel D; Iverson D; Zorbas H
BMC Public Health; 2008 Jan; 8():13. PubMed ID: 18194528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evolution of breast cancer screening in countries with intermediate and increasing incidence of breast cancer.
Wu GH; Chen LS; Chang KJ; Hou MF; Chen SC; Liu TJ; Huang CS; Hsu GC; Yu CC; Jeng LL; Chen ST; Chou YH; Wu CY; Shin-Lan K; Chen TH;
J Med Screen; 2006; 13 Suppl 1():S23-7. PubMed ID: 17227638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for breast cancer in England: past and future.
Advisory Committee on Breast Cancer Screening
J Med Screen; 2006; 13(2):59-61. PubMed ID: 16792825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Can Flemish women in semi-rural areas be motivated to attend organized breast cancer screening?
Van Hal G; Matthyssen M; Thibaut A; Weyler J
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 1999 Apr; 47(2):119-27. PubMed ID: 10367299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [CBO guideline 'Breast cancer: screening and diagnosis'].
Rutgers EJ; Tuut MK
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2001 Jan; 145(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 11206120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The NCI All Ireland Cancer Conference.
Johnston PG; Daly PA; Liu E
Oncologist; 1999; 4(4):275-277. PubMed ID: 10545862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of effectiveness of quality-assured mammography screening in Germany: sample size considerations and design options.
Becker N; Hakama M; Nyström L
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2007 Jun; 16(3):225-31. PubMed ID: 17415093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Contributions of the epidemiological cancer registries to the evaluation of mammography screening in Germany].
Urbschat I; Kieschke J; Schlanstedt-Jahn U; von Gehlen S; Thiel A; Jensch P
Gesundheitswesen; 2005 Jul; 67(7):448-54. PubMed ID: 16103967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Population screening for breast cancer: an interim assessment].
van der Maas PJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1096-9. PubMed ID: 10876703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
