202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9612652)
1. [Prognostic value of histologic classifications of advanced stomach cancer: comparative study of Lauren's and Goseki's classifications].
Guglielmi A; de Manzoni G; Tomezzoli A; Ricci F; Pelosi G; Laterza E; Di Leo A; Bonfiglio M
Chir Ital; 1997; 49(3):45-9. PubMed ID: 9612652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Histological grading in gastric cancer by Goseki classification: correlation with histopathological subtypes and prognosis.
Mönig S; Baldus SE; Collet PH; Zirbes TK; Bollschweiler E; Thiele J; Dienes HP; Hölscher AH
Anticancer Res; 2001; 21(1B):617-20. PubMed ID: 11299815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Goseki classification in adenocarcinoma of the cardia].
De Manzoni G; Pedrazzani C; Di Leo A; Bonfiglio M; Zerman G; Tasselli S; Borzellino G
Minerva Chir; 2002 Aug; 57(4):449-55. PubMed ID: 12145574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Correlation of histological classifications of gastric carcinomas with location and prognosis].
Calli Demirkan N; Tunçyürek M; Ugur Ertan E; Bülent Alkanat M; Içöz G
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2002; 26(6-7):610-5. PubMed ID: 12193861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lack of prognostic significance in Goseki grading of gastric carcinoma.
Ventura L; Chiominto A; Discepoli S; Ventura T; Di Giacomo C; Leocata P
J Exp Clin Cancer Res; 2002 Jun; 21(2):225-7. PubMed ID: 12148582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Prognostic value of the Lauren and Ming classifications in gastric adenocarcinoma. Multidimensional analysis].
Garnier P; Vielh P; Asselain B; Durand JC; Girodet J; Pilleron JP; Salmon RJ
Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 1988; 12(6-7):553-8. PubMed ID: 3417082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification of lymph node metastases from gastric cancer: comparison between N-site and N-number systems. Our experience and review of the literature.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Rossi S; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Nigri G; Ercolani G; De Angelis R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2007 Apr; 73(4):359-66. PubMed ID: 17439029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between site N-category and number N-category for nodal staging in carcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction: our experience and literature review.
Aurello P; D'Angelo F; Nigri G; Bellagamba R; Cicchini C; Ruzzetti R; Ramacciato G
Am Surg; 2006 Feb; 72(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 16536239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lauren's and Goseki's grade distribution does not change along with the progression from an early to advanced gastric carcinoma.
Stachura J; Popiela T; Kulig J; Urbańczyk K; Heitzman J
Pol J Pathol; 1998; 49(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 9810173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preferential overexpression of CD44v5 in advanced gastric carcinoma Goseki grades I and III.
Stachura J; Krzeszowiak A; Popiela T; Urbańczyk K; Pituch-Noworolska A; Wieckiewicz J; Zembala M
Pol J Pathol; 1999; 50(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 10624117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Metastatic lymph node ratio is an independent prognostic factor in gastric cancer.
Asoglu O; Karanlik H; Parlak M; Kecer M; Muslumanoglu M; Igci A; Ozmen V; Gulluoglu M; Kapran Y
Hepatogastroenterology; 2009; 56(91-92):908-13. PubMed ID: 19621727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Prognostic factors in resected stomach carcinoma].
Oertli D; Herzog U; Tondelli P
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1994 Jun; 124(22):945-52. PubMed ID: 7518097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the prognostic significance between the number of metastatic lymph nodes and nodal stage in gastric carcinoma.
Kato M; Saji S; Kawaguchi Y; Kunieda K; Sugiyama Y; Takagi Y; Hiraoka T; Kumazawa I; Adachi T
Hepatogastroenterology; 1999; 46(30):3281-6. PubMed ID: 10626202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Lauren's, Ming's and WHO histological classifications of gastric cancer as a prognostic factor for operated patients.
Cimerman M; Repse S; Jelenc F; Omejc M; Bitenc M; Lamovec J
Int Surg; 1994; 79(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 8063551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Gastric cancer: prognostic significance of the Goseki histological classification.
Scilletta B; Lanteri R; Rapisarda C; Greco L; Lanzafame S; Torrisi A; Puleo S; Licata A
Chir Ital; 2002; 54(3):307-10. PubMed ID: 12192924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical impact of metastatic lymph node ratio in advanced gastric cancer.
Kunisaki C; Shimada H; Nomura M; Matsuda G; Otsuka Y; Ono H; Akiyama H
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(2B):1369-75. PubMed ID: 15865093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prognostic value of lymph node staging in gastric cancer.
Ichikawa D; Kurioka H; Ueshima Y; Shirono K; Kan K; Shioaki Y; Lee CJ; Hamashima T; Deguchi E; Ikeda E; Mutoh F; Yamagishi H
Hepatogastroenterology; 2003; 50(49):301-4. PubMed ID: 12630046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical evaluation of lymph node metastasis in gastric cancer defined by the fifth edition of the TNM classification in comparison with the Japanese system.
Fujii K; Isozaki H; Okajima K; Nomura E; Niki M; Sako S; Izumi N; Mabuchi H; Nishiguchi K; Tanigawa N
Br J Surg; 1999 May; 86(5):685-9. PubMed ID: 10361195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The prognostic significance of the mucin phenotype of gastric adenocarcinoma and its relationship with histologic classifications.
Lee OJ; Kim HJ; Kim JR; Watanabe H
Oncol Rep; 2009 Feb; 21(2):387-93. PubMed ID: 19148512
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Tenascin expression in gastric cancer with special emphasis on the WHO-, Lauren-, and Goseki-classifications.
Zirbes TK; Baldus SE; Moenig SP; Schmitz K; Thiele J; Holscher AH; Dienes HP
Int J Mol Med; 1999 Jul; 4(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 10373635
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
