166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9614011)
1. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public.
Smith R
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters.
Farthing MJ
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Time to face up to research misconduct.
Smith R
BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud.
Farthing MJ
Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct in medical research.
Verma BL; Shukla GD
J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response.
Horton R
Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison.
Lock S
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8308474
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Editors call for misconduct watchdog.
Williams N
Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Will the UK cope?
Horton R
Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory.
Riis P
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dealing with deception.
Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):843. PubMed ID: 8622383
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives.
Chantler C; Chantler S
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. British editors form misconduct panel.
Kaiser J
Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Call for research misconduct agency.
White C
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark.
Riis P
BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1733. PubMed ID: 9652924
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter.
Goldbeck-Wood S
BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France.
Maisonneuve H
BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Development of international guidelines for research ethics: a commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin).
Kaiser M
Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 11657868
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Misconduct in medical research: does it exist in Britain?
Lock S
BMJ; 1988 Dec; 297(6662):1531-5. PubMed ID: 3147062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of research misconduct--in practice.
Wells FO
J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):115-21. PubMed ID: 8308473
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
