These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9614011)
1. The need for a national body for research misconduct. Nothing less will reassure the public. Smith R BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1686-7. PubMed ID: 9614011 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. An editor's response to fraudsters. Farthing MJ BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1729-31. PubMed ID: 9652922 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Time to face up to research misconduct. Smith R BMJ; 1996 Mar; 312(7034):789-90. PubMed ID: 8608272 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Fraud in medicine. Coping with fraud. Farthing MJ Lancet; 1998 Dec 19-26; 352 Suppl 4():SIV11. PubMed ID: 9872158 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Scientific misconduct in medical research. Verma BL; Shukla GD J Indian Med Assoc; 1992 Aug; 90(8):222-5. PubMed ID: 1460306 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Scientific misconduct: exaggerated fear but still real and requiring a proportionate response. Horton R Lancet; 1999 Jul; 354(9172):7-8. PubMed ID: 10406357 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Research misconduct: a brief history and a comparison. Lock S J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):123-7. PubMed ID: 8308474 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Editors call for misconduct watchdog. Williams N Science; 1998 Jun; 280(5370):1685-6. PubMed ID: 9660704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Prevention and management of fraud--in theory. Riis P J Intern Med; 1994 Feb; 235(2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8308472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Will the UK cope? Horton R Lancet; 1997 Jul; 350(9073):234. PubMed ID: 9242798 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Honest advice from Denmark. Riis P BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1733. PubMed ID: 9652924 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Development of international guidelines for research ethics: a commentary on "Scientific misconduct: present problems and future trends" (B. Mishkin). Kaiser M Sci Eng Ethics; 1999 Apr; 5(2):293-8. PubMed ID: 11657868 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Dealing with research misconduct in the United Kingdom. Deception: difficulties and initiatives. Chantler C; Chantler S BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1731-2. PubMed ID: 9652923 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. British editors form misconduct panel. Kaiser J Science; 1997 Aug; 277(5326):627. PubMed ID: 11644953 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Call for research misconduct agency. White C BMJ; 1998 Jun; 316(7146):1695. PubMed ID: 11645068 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Misconduct in research. Misconduct is not reported in biomedical journals in France. Maisonneuve H BMJ; 1996 Jul; 313(7049):109. PubMed ID: 8688718 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Scientists call for whistleblowers' charter. Goldbeck-Wood S BMJ; 1997 Nov; 315(7118):1252. PubMed ID: 11644976 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What's new in research ethics. Bull Med Ethics; 1996 Oct; No. 122():13-8. PubMed ID: 11654863 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]