These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9615610)

  • 1. A study on the effect of operating parameters on the cross-flow microfiltration of yeasts.
    Hashim MA; Sen Gupta B
    Bioseparation; 1997; 7(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 9615610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental studies and statistical analysis of membrane fouling behavior and performance in microfiltration of microalgae by a gas sparging assisted process.
    Javadi N; Ashtiani FZ; Fouladitajar A; Zenooz AM
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Jun; 162():350-7. PubMed ID: 24768909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facile fouling resistant surface modification of microfiltration cellulose acetate membranes by using amino acid L-DOPA.
    Azari S; Zou L; Cornelissen E; Mukai Y
    Water Sci Technol; 2013; 68(4):901-8. PubMed ID: 23985522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimization of protein fractionation by skim milk microfiltration: Choice of ceramic membrane pore size and filtration temperature.
    Jørgensen CE; Abrahamsen RK; Rukke EO; Johansen AG; Schüller RB; Skeie SB
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Aug; 99(8):6164-6179. PubMed ID: 27265169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pilot-scale harvest of recombinant yeast employing microfiltration: a case study.
    Russotti G; Osawa AE; Sitrin RD; Buckland BC; Adams WR; Lee SS
    J Biotechnol; 1995 Oct; 42(3):235-46. PubMed ID: 7576542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of pore size, shear rate, and harvest time during the constant permeate flux microfiltration of CHO cell culture supernatant.
    Stressmann M; Moresoli C
    Biotechnol Prog; 2008; 24(4):890-7. PubMed ID: 19194898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of colloidal fouling and gas sparging on microfiltration of yeast suspension.
    Gupta BS; Hasan S; Hashim MA; Cui ZF
    Bioprocess Biosyst Eng; 2005 Oct; 27(6):407-413. PubMed ID: 16096765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparison of ultra- and microfiltration in the presence and absence of secondary flow with polysaccharides, proteins, and yeast suspensions.
    Gehlert G; Luque S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Prog; 1998; 14(6):931-42. PubMed ID: 9841658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling tangential flow filtration using reverse asymmetric membranes for bioreactor harvesting.
    Zhang D; Patel P; Strauss D; Qian X; Wickramasinghe SR
    Biotechnol Prog; 2021 Jan; 37(1):e3084. PubMed ID: 32975033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A process efficiency assessment of serum protein removal from milk using ceramic graded permeability microfiltration membrane.
    Tremblay-Marchand D; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jul; 99(7):5230-5243. PubMed ID: 27132105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Permeate flux optimisation of a pilot microfiltration plant for cost-effectiveness of water reclamation for reuse.
    Xie RJ; Gomez MJ; Xing YJ
    J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng; 2006; 41(7):1169-81. PubMed ID: 16854793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Investigation of factors affecting sodium alginate fouling mechanisms in a microfiltration process under non-constant-flux and non-constant-pressure conditions.
    Liu YJ
    Water Sci Technol; 2023 Jul; 88(1):169-184. PubMed ID: 37452541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Enzyme recovery during gas/liquid two-phase flow microfiltration of enzyme/yeast mixtures.
    Mercier-Bonin M; Fonade C
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2002 Dec; 80(6):610-21. PubMed ID: 12378602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Process efficiency of casein separation from milk using polymeric spiral-wound microfiltration membranes.
    Mercier-Bouchard D; Benoit S; Doyen A; Britten M; Pouliot Y
    J Dairy Sci; 2017 Nov; 100(11):8838-8848. PubMed ID: 28843690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Crossflow microfiltration of yeast suspensions in tubular filters.
    Redkar SG; Davis RH
    Biotechnol Prog; 1993; 9(6):625-34. PubMed ID: 7764351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new coiled hollow-fiber module design for enhanced microfiltration performance in biotechnology.
    Luque S; Mallubhotla H; Gehlert G; Kuriyel R; Dzengeleski S; Pearl S; Belfort G
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1999 Nov; 65(3):247-57. PubMed ID: 10486122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of membrane characteristics on the performance of membrane bioreactors for oily wastewater treatment.
    Mafirad S; Mehrnia MR; Sarrafzadeh MH
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(5):1154-60. PubMed ID: 22214065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Accelerating sample preparation through enzyme-assisted microfiltration of Salmonella in chicken extract.
    Vibbert HB; Ku S; Li X; Liu X; Ximenes E; Kreke T; Ladisch MR; Deering AJ; Gehring AG
    Biotechnol Prog; 2015; 31(6):1551-62. PubMed ID: 26400739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Monte Carlo simulation of pore blocking phenomena in cross-flow microfiltration.
    Chen Y; Hu X; Kim H
    Water Res; 2011 Dec; 45(20):6789-97. PubMed ID: 22071323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of the importance of various operating and sludge property parameters to the fouling of membrane bioreactors.
    Sun FY; Li XY
    Water Sci Technol; 2011; 64(6):1340-6. PubMed ID: 22214089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.