These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9615610)

  • 21. Studies on the scale-up of microfiltration membrane devices.
    Brose DJ; Cates S; Hutchison FA
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 1994; 48(4):184-8. PubMed ID: 7804817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A crossflow filtration system for constant permeate flux membrane fouling characterization.
    Miller DJ; Paul DR; Freeman BD
    Rev Sci Instrum; 2013 Mar; 84(3):035003. PubMed ID: 23556842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Two-phase bioconversion product recovery by microfiltration I. Steady state studies.
    Conrad PB; Lee SS
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Mar; 57(6):631-41. PubMed ID: 10099243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Scale-up of Sterilizing-grade Membrane Filters from Discs to Pleated Cartridges: Effects of Operating Parameters and Solution Properties.
    Kumar A; Martin J; Kuriyel R
    PDA J Pharm Sci Technol; 2015; 69(1):74-87. PubMed ID: 25691716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of organic nutrient load on biomass accumulation, feed channel pressure drop increase and permeate flux decline in membrane systems.
    Bucs SS; Valladares Linares R; van Loosdrecht MC; Kruithof JC; Vrouwenvelder JS
    Water Res; 2014 Dec; 67():227-42. PubMed ID: 25282091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of linear velocity and flux on performance of ceramic graded permeability membranes when processing skim milk at 50°C.
    Zulewska J; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2014 May; 97(5):2619-32. PubMed ID: 24612815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of filtration characteristics in submerged microfiltration for drinking water treatment.
    Lee S; Park PK; Kim JH; Yeon KM; Lee CH
    Water Res; 2008 Jun; 42(12):3109-21. PubMed ID: 18387649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fouling resilient perforated feed spacers for membrane filtration.
    Kerdi S; Qamar A; Vrouwenvelder JS; Ghaffour N
    Water Res; 2018 Sep; 140():211-219. PubMed ID: 29715645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Separation of BSA through FAU-type zeolite ceramic composite membrane formed on tubular ceramic support: Optimization of process parameters by hybrid response surface methodology and biobjective genetic algorithm.
    Vinoth Kumar R; Ganesh Moorthy I; Pugazhenthi G
    Prep Biochem Biotechnol; 2017 Aug; 47(7):687-698. PubMed ID: 28277946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Analysis and simulation of complex interactions during dynamic microfiltration of Escherichia coli suspensions.
    Meyer F; Gehmlich I; Guthke R; Górak A; Knorre WA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 1998 Jul; 59(2):189-202. PubMed ID: 10099330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Microfiltration membrane plant start up: a case study with autopsy and permeability recovery analysis.
    Porcelli N; Hillis P; Judd S
    Environ Technol; 2009 May; 30(6):629-39. PubMed ID: 19603708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Characterization of ultrafiltration of undiluted and diluted stored urine.
    Ouma J; Septien S; Velkushanova K; Pocock J; Buckley C
    Water Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 74(9):2105-2114. PubMed ID: 27842030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparative testing of tangential microfiltration for microbial cultures.
    Naja G; Volesky B; Schnell A
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2006 Nov; 95(4):584-98. PubMed ID: 16958140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Understanding the size and character of fouling-causing substances from effluent organic matter (EfOM) in low-pressure membrane filtration.
    Laabs CN; Amy GL; Jekel M
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Jul; 40(14):4495-9. PubMed ID: 16903291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Critical analysis of submerged membrane sequencing batch reactor operating conditions.
    McAdam E; Judd SJ; Gildemeister R; Drews A; Kraume M
    Water Res; 2005 Oct; 39(16):4011-9. PubMed ID: 16129471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The use of ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes for the purification of cork processing wastewater.
    Benítez FJ; Acero JL; Leal AI; González M
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Mar; 162(2-3):1438-45. PubMed ID: 18650003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Separation and purification of phycocyanin from Spirulina sp. using a membrane process.
    Chaiklahan R; Chirasuwan N; Loha V; Tia S; Bunnag B
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(14):7159-64. PubMed ID: 21570281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Impact of Membrane Pore Size on the Clarification Performance of Grape Marc Extract by Microfiltration.
    Mora F; Pérez K; Quezada C; Herrera C; Cassano A; Ruby-Figueroa R
    Membranes (Basel); 2019 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 31698840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Serum protein removal from skim milk with a 3-stage, 3× ceramic Isoflux membrane process at 50°C.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2013 Apr; 96(4):2020-2034. PubMed ID: 23415524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of ceramic membrane channel diameter on limiting retentate protein concentration during skim milk microfiltration.
    Adams MC; Barbano DM
    J Dairy Sci; 2016 Jan; 99(1):167-82. PubMed ID: 26519975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.