BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

160 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9616104)

  • 1. Comparisons of three probability formulae for parentage exclusion.
    Jamieson A; Taylor SC
    Anim Genet; 1997 Dec; 28(6):397-400. PubMed ID: 9616104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effectiveness of using co-dominant polymorphic allelic series for (1) checking pedigrees and (2) distinguishing full-sib pair members.
    Jamieson A
    Anim Genet; 1994 Jun; 25 Suppl 1():37-44. PubMed ID: 7943982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of genotyping errors on parentage exclusion analysis.
    Wang J
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Nov; 19(22):5061-78. PubMed ID: 20964757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Difficulties in parentage analysis: the probability that an offspring and parent have the same heterozygous genotype.
    Fiumera AC; Asmussen MA
    Genet Res; 2001 Oct; 78(2):163-70. PubMed ID: 11732093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gametic phase disequilibrium between the syntenic multiallelic HTG4 and HMS3 markers widely used for parentage testing in Thoroughbred horses.
    Machado FB; de Vasconcellos Machado L; Bydlowski CR; Bydlowski SP; Medina-Acosta E
    Mol Biol Rep; 2012 Feb; 39(2):1447-52. PubMed ID: 21607619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Exclusion and Genomic Relatedness Methods for Assignment of Parentage Using Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data.
    Dodds KG; McEwan JC; Brauning R; van Stijn TC; Rowe SJ; McEwan KM; Clarke SM
    G3 (Bethesda); 2019 Oct; 9(10):3239-3247. PubMed ID: 31383721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Power of exclusion of 19 microsatellite markers for parentage testing in river buffalo (Bubalus bubalis).
    Kathiravan P; Kataria RS; Mishra BP
    Mol Biol Rep; 2012 Aug; 39(8):8217-23. PubMed ID: 22555978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Formula Derivation and Validation of Probability of Exclusion in the Cases of Standard Triplet Parentage Testing].
    Zhou M; Zhang HQ; Wang J
    Fa Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Aug; 33(4):363-367. PubMed ID: 29219265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Validation of microsatellite markers for routine horse parentage testing.
    Bowling AT; Eggleston-Stott ML; Byrns G; Clark RS; Dileanis S; Wictum E
    Anim Genet; 1997 Aug; 28(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 9345720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recent development of allele frequencies and exclusion probabilities of microsatellites used for parentage control in the German Holstein Friesian cattle population.
    Brenig B; Schütz E
    BMC Genet; 2016 Jan; 17():18. PubMed ID: 26747197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Parentage and sibship exclusions: higher statistical power with more family members.
    Wang J
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Aug; 99(2):205-17. PubMed ID: 17487215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Single nucleotide polymorphisms for DNA typing in the domestic horse.
    Holl HM; Vanhnasy J; Everts RE; Hoefs-Martin K; Cook D; Brooks SA; Carpenter ML; Bustamante CD; Lafayette C
    Anim Genet; 2017 Dec; 48(6):669-676. PubMed ID: 28901559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Parentage testing of racing camels (Camelus dromedarius) using microsatellite DNA typing.
    Spencer PB; Wilson KJ; Tinson A
    Anim Genet; 2010 Dec; 41(6):662-5. PubMed ID: 20394604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Parentage testing in alpacas (Vicugna pacos) using semi-automated fluorescent multiplex PCRs with 10 microsatellite markers.
    Agapito J; Rodríguez J; Herrera-Velit P; Timoteo O; Rojas P; Boettcher PJ; García F; Espinoza JR
    Anim Genet; 2008 Apr; 39(2):201-3. PubMed ID: 18261186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Paternity evaluation in cases lacking a mother and nondetectable alleles.
    Chakraborty R; Jin L; Zhong Y
    Int J Legal Med; 1994; 107(3):127-31. PubMed ID: 7893609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effectiveness of microsatellite and single nucleotide polymorphism markers for parentage analysis in European domestic pigs.
    Yu GC; Tang QZ; Long KR; Che TD; Li MZ; Shuai SR
    Genet Mol Res; 2015 Feb; 14(1):1362-70. PubMed ID: 25730075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Analysis of microsatellites and parentage testing in saltwater crocodiles.
    Isberg SR; Chen Y; Barker SG; Moran C
    J Hered; 2004; 95(5):445-9. PubMed ID: 15388772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A general approach to power calculation for relationship testing.
    Egeland T; Pinto N; Vigeland MD
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2014 Mar; 9():186-90. PubMed ID: 23810238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Paternity exclusion by DNA markers: effects of paternal mutations.
    Chakraborty R; Stivers DN
    J Forensic Sci; 1996 Jul; 41(4):671-7. PubMed ID: 8754581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Structure of Guanzhong Horse Using Microsatellite Markers.
    Zeng L; Chen N; Yao Y; Dang R; Chen H; Lei C
    Anim Biotechnol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):95-98. PubMed ID: 29463179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.