These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 961710)

  • 1. Enterobacteriaceae identification compared by MORLOC (a new system) and API 20E.
    Branson D
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Aug; 42(8):267-76. PubMed ID: 961710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of the API 20E system to identify non-Enterobacteriaceae from veterinary medical sources.
    Collins MT; Swanson EC
    Am J Vet Res; 1981 Jul; 42(7):1269-73. PubMed ID: 7023301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Rapid and automated identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the abbott MS-2 system and API-20E versus conventional methods.
    Izard D; Savage C; Enayeh E; Leclerc H; Troonen H
    Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 May; 252(1):26-34. PubMed ID: 6750982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Enterobacteriaceae identification by MORLOC and API 20E.
    Macpherson CR
    Am J Med Technol; 1976 Dec; 42(12):470. PubMed ID: 793390
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of Minibact, a new system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Comparison of Minibact, Micro-ID and API 20E with a conventional method as reference.
    Kjaeldgaard P; Nissen B; Lange N; Laursen H
    Acta Pathol Microbiol Immunol Scand B; 1986 Apr; 94(2):57-61. PubMed ID: 3524112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae: evaluation of 3 commercial systems].
    Sala A; Dore R; Raffaele L; Cappello P
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1985 Jun; 21(2):214-24. PubMed ID: 4080964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparative evaluation of 3 miniaturized systems (API 20E, Enterotube II, Sensititre AP60) commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories].
    Chiaradia V; Pistello M; Pascoli L; Tarabini Castellani G; Beduz R; Menin A; Santini G
    Quad Sclavo Diagn; 1983 Jun; 19(2):159-75. PubMed ID: 6374735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Using SIB and API kits to identify and biotype enterobacteria of different origin.
    Kulinich LI; Fish NG; Mazitova OP; Dratvin SA; Birger MO
    J Hyg Epidemiol Microbiol Immunol; 1987; 31(3):287-92. PubMed ID: 3316379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of enteric identification systems.
    Borchardt KA; Gibson J
    Health Lab Sci; 1977 Jan; 14(1):5-10. PubMed ID: 319082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Use of the API 20E system for rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae (six hours) (author's transl)].
    Pinon G; Loulergue J; Quentin R; Darchis JP; Prieur D; Vargues R
    Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1979; 37(4):221-3. PubMed ID: 525850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the Microbact-12E and 24E systems and the API-20E system for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Mugg P; Hill A
    J Hyg (Lond); 1981 Oct; 87(2):287-97. PubMed ID: 7026673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Comparison of Micro-ID, API 20 E and a conventional technique for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae].
    Gregersen T; Persson B; Jensen MM
    Nord Vet Med; 1980 May; 32(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 6992099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the API rapid E four-hour system with the API 20E overnight system for the identification of routine clinical isolates of the family Enterobacteriaceae.
    Overman TL; Plumley D; Overman SB; Goodman NL
    J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Apr; 21(4):542-5. PubMed ID: 3886691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of the Micro-ID, the API 20E and the Rapid 20E for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Appelbaum PC; Jacobs MR; Buick MK; Flanagan MM; Gymer GA
    Eur J Clin Microbiol; 1985 Oct; 4(5):498-501. PubMed ID: 3905400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of biochemical and molecular methods for the identification of bacterial isolates associated with failed loggerhead sea turtle eggs.
    Awong-Taylor J; Craven KS; Griffiths L; Bass C; Muscarella M
    J Appl Microbiol; 2008 May; 104(5):1244-51. PubMed ID: 18028359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reevaluation of the API 20E identification system versus conventional biochemicals for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae: a new look at an old product.
    O'Hara CM; Rhoden DL; Miller JM
    J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Jan; 30(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 1734043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Discordancies between classical and API 20E microtest biochemical identification of Vibrio and Aeromonas strains].
    Israil AM; Balotescu MC; Alexandru I; Dobre G
    Bacteriol Virusol Parazitol Epidemiol; 2003; 48(2-3):141-3. PubMed ID: 15341329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the Sensititre system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae.
    Staneck JL; Vincelette J; Lamothe F; Polk EA
    J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Apr; 17(4):647-54. PubMed ID: 6343422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Rapid identification of Enterobacteriaceae with the Micro-ID system (author's transl)].
    Peuckert W; Pelz K
    Zentralbl Bakteriol A; 1980 Aug; 247(3):323-32. PubMed ID: 6999799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of two commerical methods for the identification of the Enterobacteriaceae--API 20E and the Enterotube--with conventional methods.
    Hayek LJ; Willis GW
    J Clin Pathol; 1976 Feb; 29(2):158-61. PubMed ID: 777035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.