These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
74 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 961710)
21. Comparison of two methods for same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Appelbaum PC; Arthur RR; Parker ME; Shugar GL; Von Kuster LC; Charache P Am J Clin Pathol; 1982 Sep; 78(3):351-5. PubMed ID: 7051807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of the four-hour rapid 20E system for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Izard D; Husson MO; Vincent P; Leclerc H; Monget D; Boeufgras JM J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Jul; 20(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6378967 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Evaluation of API 20E strips for identification of coagulase-negative staphylococci from the urinary tract. Anderson DY; Vredeveld GN; Brake SR; Buchanan TF; Lewis JF Am J Med Technol; 1983 Dec; 49(12):879-81. PubMed ID: 6367462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparison of automated and rapid manual methods for the same-day identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Jorgensen JH; Johnson JE; Alexander GA; Paxson R; Alderson GL Am J Clin Pathol; 1983 Jun; 79(6):683-7. PubMed ID: 6342361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Micro-ID, a modified Minitek system, and conventional methods for four-hour identification of Enterobacteriacae directly from blood cultures. Wellstood S Am J Med Technol; 1982 Sep; 48(9):769-73. PubMed ID: 6753582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of the Phoenix 100 ID/AST system and NID panel for identification of Enterobacteriaceae, Vibrionaceae, and commonly isolated nonenteric gram-negative bacilli. O'Hara CM J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Mar; 44(3):928-33. PubMed ID: 16517878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Clinical evaluation of the MICRO-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems for identification of Enterobacteriacea. Edberg SC; Atkinson B; Chambers C; Moore MH; Palumbo L; Zorzon CF; Singer JM J Clin Microbiol; 1979 Aug; 10(2):161-7. PubMed ID: 389946 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of six systems for the identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Mastroeni P; Carbone M; Fera MT; Teti G G Batteriol Virol Immunol; 1983; 76(1-6):3-19. PubMed ID: 6383930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. [Comparison of two systems for identifying coliform enterobacteria newly described or rarely found in clinical practice]. Renaud F; Freney J; Gavini F; Boeufgras JM; Fleurette J Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 1990; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 2188531 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Use of the API 20E system to identify veterinary Enterobacteriaceae. Swanson EC; Collins MT J Clin Microbiol; 1980 Jul; 12(1):10-4. PubMed ID: 6999012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Biotyping of clinical isolates of Escherichia coli of animal origin, using the Analytab API 20E system. Godbout-DeLasalle F; Higgins R Can J Vet Res; 1986 Jul; 50(3):418-21. PubMed ID: 3527394 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of Micro-ID, for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Izard D; Gavini F; Ochin D; Enayeh E; Leclerc H Pathol Biol (Paris); 1980 Dec; 28(10):681-4. PubMed ID: 7008005 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. A clinical evaluation of the API microtube system for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Brooks KA; Jens M; Sodeman TM Am J Med Technol; 1974 Feb; 40(2):55-61. PubMed ID: 4591715 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [Identification of Gram negative rods and evaluation of their antibiotic sensitivity: comparison of the BIOTEST MHK/ID-system with the API 20E-system and the agar diffusion test]. Stanek G; Hirschl A; Rotter M Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Oct; 253(1):61-75. PubMed ID: 6817546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Differences in the API 20E biochemical patterns of clinical and environmental Vibrio parahaemolyticus isolates. Martinez-Urtaza J; Lozano-Leon A; ViƱa-Feas A; de Novoa J; Garcia-Martin O FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2006 Feb; 255(1):75-81. PubMed ID: 16436064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of micro-ID, API 20E, and conventional media systems in identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Aldridge KE; Gardner BB; Clark SJ; Matsen JM J Clin Microbiol; 1978 Jun; 7(6):507-13. PubMed ID: 353065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparison of the MIC 2000 enteric media with API 20 E and conventional methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae. Courcol RJ; Husson MO; Izard DE; Martin GR Zentralbl Bakteriol Mikrobiol Hyg A Med Mikrobiol Infekt Parasitol; 1982 Sep; 252(4):472-9. PubMed ID: 6758421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparison of four rapid methods for identification of Enterobacteriaceae from blood cultures. Malloy PJ; Ducate MJ; Schreckenberger PC J Clin Microbiol; 1983 Mar; 17(3):493-9. PubMed ID: 6841583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of workflow and accuracy of identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing of clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and enterococci by Vitek 2 and routine methods. Rantakokko-Jalava K; Elo-Lehtonen E; Meurman O APMIS; 2006 Jan; 114(1):43-9. PubMed ID: 16499660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparative evaluation of the Eiken and API 20E systems and conventional methods for identification of members of the family Enterobacteriaceae. Castillo CB; Bruckner DA J Clin Microbiol; 1984 Oct; 20(4):754-7. PubMed ID: 6490860 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]