These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9617451)

  • 21. Resin pins: a novel composite resin concept for treatment of posterior teeth--technical presentation.
    de Almeida BC; de Almeida RS
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2008 Sep; 20(8):507-11; quiz 512. PubMed ID: 18990903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Bond strength and ultimate tensile strength of resin composite filled into dentine cavity; effect of bulk and incremental filling technique.
    Nayif MM; Nakajima M; Foxton RM; Tagami J
    J Dent; 2008 Mar; 36(3):228-34. PubMed ID: 18276057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Dentin bond strength and marginal adaptation: direct composite resins vs ceramic inlays.
    Frankenberger R; Sindel J; Krämer N; Petschelt A
    Oper Dent; 1999; 24(3):147-55. PubMed ID: 10530276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Interdental design of porcelain veneers in the presence of composite fillings: finite element analysis of composite shrinkage and thermal stresses.
    Magne P; Douglas WH
    Int J Prosthodont; 2000; 13(2):117-24. PubMed ID: 11203619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Microleakage of resin composite restorations with glass-ceramic inserts.
    Olmez A; Oztaş N; Bilici S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Nov; 29(11):725-9. PubMed ID: 10200722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Polymerization shrinkage: effects of boundary conditions and filling technique of resin composite restorations.
    Loguercio AD; Reis A; Schroeder M; Balducci I; Versluis A; Ballester RY
    J Dent; 2004 Aug; 32(6):459-70. PubMed ID: 15240064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparison of the marginal and internal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in small to moderate-sized Class II preparations of conventional design.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2000 May; 31(5):347-52. PubMed ID: 11203946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Influence of different softstart polymerization techniques on marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Muangmingsuk A; Senawongse P; Yudhasaraprasithi S
    Am J Dent; 2003 Apr; 16(2):117-9. PubMed ID: 12797570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Corono-radicular reconstruction of pulpless teeth: a mechanical study using finite element analysis.
    Pierrisnard L; Bohin F; Renault P; Barquins M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Oct; 88(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 12447223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of incremental curing on contraction stresses associated with various resin composite buildups.
    Tachibana K; Kuroe T; Tanino Y; Satoh N; Ohata N; Sano H; Caputo AA
    Quintessence Int; 2004 Apr; 35(4):299-306. PubMed ID: 15119716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The effect of different drying methods for single step adhesive systems on microleakage of tooth colored restorations.
    Owens BM
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2003 Feb; 4(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 12595929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Does an incremental filling technique reduce polymerization shrinkage stresses?
    Versluis A; Douglas WH; Cross M; Sakaguchi RL
    J Dent Res; 1996 Mar; 75(3):871-8. PubMed ID: 8675797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of two different restorative techniques using resin-based composites on microleakage.
    Aranha AC; Pimenta LA
    Am J Dent; 2004 Apr; 17(2):99-103. PubMed ID: 15151335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Filling cavities or restoring teeth?
    Versluis A; Versluis-Tantbirojn D
    J Tenn Dent Assoc; 2011; 91(2):36-42; quiz 42-3. PubMed ID: 21748978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Polymerization shrinkage stresses in a premolar restored with different composite resins and different incremental techniques.
    Soares CJ; Bicalho AA; Tantbirojn D; Versluis A
    J Adhes Dent; 2013 Aug; 15(4):341-50. PubMed ID: 23560252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reinforcement effect of polyethylene fibre in root-filled teeth: comparison of two restoration techniques.
    Belli S; Erdemir A; Yildirim C
    Int Endod J; 2006 Feb; 39(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 16454794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hardness comparison of bulk-filled/transtooth and incremental-filled/occlusally irradiated composite resins.
    Lazarchik DA; Hammond BD; Sikes CL; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Aug; 98(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 17692594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Tooth deformation patterns in molars after composite restoration.
    Tantbirojn D; Versluis A; Pintado MR; DeLong R; Douglas WH
    Dent Mater; 2004 Jul; 20(6):535-42. PubMed ID: 15134941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Evaluation of the microleakage at the proximal walls of Class II cavities restored using resin composite and precured composite inserts.
    Wahab FK; Shaini FJ
    Quintessence Int; 2003 Sep; 34(8):600-6. PubMed ID: 14620211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of different composite restoration techniques on cuspal deflection: an in vitro study.
    González-López S; Lucena-Martín C; de Haro-Gasquet F; Vilchez-Díaz MA; de Haro-Muñoz C
    Oper Dent; 2004; 29(6):656-60. PubMed ID: 15646221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.