These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9619174)

  • 1. Local recurrence of breast cancer after cytological evaluation of lumpectomy margins.
    Cox CE; Pendas S; Ku NN; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HS; Nicosia SV
    Am Surg; 1998 Jun; 64(6):533-7; discussion 537-8. PubMed ID: 9619174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of imprint cytology for assessment of surgical margins in lumpectomy specimens of breast cancer patients.
    Bakhshandeh M; Tutuncuoglu SO; Fischer G; Masood S
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):656-9. PubMed ID: 17854083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of reexcision for positive margins in optimizing local disease control after breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
    Aziz D; Rawlinson E; Narod SA; Sun P; Lickley HL; McCready DR; Holloway CM
    Breast J; 2006; 12(4):331-7. PubMed ID: 16848842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of frozen section analysis of margins during breast conservation surgery.
    Weber S; Storm FK; Stitt J; Mahvi DM
    Cancer J Sci Am; 1997; 3(5):273-7. PubMed ID: 9327150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Frozen section analysis for intraoperative margin assessment during breast-conserving surgery results in low rates of re-excision and local recurrence.
    Olson TP; Harter J; Muñoz A; Mahvi DM; Breslin T
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2953-60. PubMed ID: 17674109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?
    Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Ali I; Feldman SM; Cohen JM
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Oct; 14(10):2940-5. PubMed ID: 17632761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy of intraoperative gross examination of surgical margin status in women undergoing partial mastectomy for breast malignancy.
    Balch GC; Mithani SK; Simpson JF; Kelley MC
    Am Surg; 2005 Jan; 71(1):22-7; discussion 27-8. PubMed ID: 15757052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of margin status in lumpectomy specimens and residual breast carcinoma.
    Scopa CD; Aroukatos P; Tsamandas AC; Aletra C
    Breast J; 2006; 12(2):150-3. PubMed ID: 16509840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytology of lumpectomy specimens.
    Ku NN; Cox CE; Reintgen DS; Greenberg HM; Nicosia SV
    Acta Cytol; 1991; 35(4):417-21. PubMed ID: 1718113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Local recurrence in lumpectomy patients after imprint cytology margin evaluation.
    Weinberg E; Cox C; Dupont E; White L; Ebert M; Greenberg H; Diaz N; Vercel V; Centeno B; Cantor A; Nicosia S
    Am J Surg; 2004 Oct; 188(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15474425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-term cosmesis after lumpectomy and brachytherapy in the management of carcinoma of the previously irradiated breast.
    Trombetta M; Julian TB; Werts DE; McWilliams W; Kim Y; Miften M; Parda D
    Am J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jun; 32(3):314-8. PubMed ID: 19451803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Role for intraoperative margin assessment in patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery.
    Cabioglu N; Hunt KK; Sahin AA; Kuerer HM; Babiera GV; Singletary SE; Whitman GJ; Ross MI; Ames FC; Feig BW; Buchholz TA; Meric-Bernstam F
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Apr; 14(4):1458-71. PubMed ID: 17260108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discordance between pathologic and radiologic tumor size on breast MRI may contribute to increased re-excision rates.
    Vanderwalde LH; Dang CM; Bresee C; Phillips EH
    Am Surg; 2011 Oct; 77(10):1361-3. PubMed ID: 22127089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
    Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
    Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The consequence of multiple re-excisions to obtain clear lumpectomy margins in breast cancer patients.
    Menes TS; Tartter PI; Bleiweiss I; Godbold JH; Estabrook A; Smith SR
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2005 Nov; 12(11):881-5. PubMed ID: 16195834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do additional shaved margins at the time of lumpectomy eliminate the need for re-excision?
    Jacobson AF; Asad J; Boolbol SK; Osborne MP; Boachie-Adjei K; Feldman SM
    Am J Surg; 2008 Oct; 196(4):556-8. PubMed ID: 18809063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Minimizing local recurrence after breast conserving therapy using intraoperative shaved margins to determine pathologic tumor clearance.
    Camp ER; McAuliffe PF; Gilroy JS; Morris CG; Lind DS; Mendenhall NP; Copeland EM
    J Am Coll Surg; 2005 Dec; 201(6):855-61. PubMed ID: 16310688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer recurrences in elderly patients after lumpectomy.
    Shah S; Doyle K; Lange EM; Shen P; Pennell T; Ferree C; Levine EA; Perrier ND
    Am Surg; 2002 Aug; 68(8):735-9. PubMed ID: 12206612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast conservation surgery and interstitial brachytherapy in the management of locally recurrent carcinoma of the breast: the Allegheny General Hospital experience.
    Trombetta M; Julian T; Bhandari T; Werts ED; Miften M; Parda D
    Brachytherapy; 2008; 7(1):29-36. PubMed ID: 18201940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.