These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9619655)

  • 1. An evaluation of current risk assessment scales for decubitus ulcer in general inpatients and wheelchair users.
    Anthony D; Barnes J; Unsworth J
    Clin Rehabil; 1998 Apr; 12(2):136-42. PubMed ID: 9619655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A regression analysis of the Waterlow score in pressure ulcer risk assessment.
    Anthony D; Reynolds T; Russell L
    Clin Rehabil; 2003 Mar; 17(2):216-23. PubMed ID: 12625664
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An evaluation of serum albumin and the sub-scores of the Waterlow score in pressure ulcer risk assessment.
    Anthony D; Rafter L; Reynolds T; Aljezawi M
    J Tissue Viability; 2011 Aug; 20(3):89-99. PubMed ID: 21665474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An optimization of the Waterlow score using regression and artificial neural networks.
    Anthony D; Clark M; Dallender J
    Clin Rehabil; 2000 Feb; 14(1):102-9. PubMed ID: 10688351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Pressure ulcer risk assessment in critical care: interrater reliability and validity studies of the Braden and Waterlow scales and subjective ratings in two intensive care units.
    Kottner J; Dassen T
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Jun; 47(6):671-7. PubMed ID: 20003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive validity of Waterlow Scale for pressure ulcer development risk in hospitalized patients.
    Serpa LF; de Gouveia Santos VL; Gomboski G; Rosado SM
    J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs; 2009; 36(6):640-6. PubMed ID: 19920745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of Braden Q, Garvin and Glamorgan risk assessment scales in paediatrics.
    Anthony D; Willock J; Baharestani M
    J Tissue Viability; 2010 Aug; 19(3):98-105. PubMed ID: 20421164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Predictive validity of the Braden Scale, Norton Scale, and Waterlow Scale in the Czech Republic.
    Šateková L; Žiaková K; Zeleníková R
    Int J Nurs Pract; 2017 Feb; 23(1):. PubMed ID: 27874258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An investigation into the use of serum albumin in pressure sore prediction.
    Anthony D; Reynolds T; Russell L
    J Adv Nurs; 2000 Aug; 32(2):359-65. PubMed ID: 10964183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pressure injuries in surgical patients: a comparison of Norton, Braden and Waterlow risk assessment scales.
    Gurkan A; Kirtil I; Aydin YD; Kutuk G
    J Wound Care; 2022 Feb; 31(2):170-177. PubMed ID: 35148625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A randomized control trial to evaluate pressure-reducing seat cushions for elderly wheelchair users.
    Geyer MJ; Brienza DM; Karg P; Trefler E; Kelsey S
    Adv Skin Wound Care; 2001; 14(3):120-9; quiz 131-2. PubMed ID: 11905977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preventing pressure sores among wheelchair users.
    Wall J
    Prof Nurse; 2000 Feb; 15(5):321-4. PubMed ID: 10986957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Risk assessment scales for pressure ulcer prevention: a systematic review.
    Pancorbo-Hidalgo PL; Garcia-Fernandez FP; Lopez-Medina IM; Alvarez-Nieto C
    J Adv Nurs; 2006 Apr; 54(1):94-110. PubMed ID: 16553695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the predictive validity of the Braden and Waterlow scales in intensive care unit patients: A multicentre study.
    Tao H; Zhang H; Ma Y; Lv L; Pei J; Jiao Y; Han L
    J Clin Nurs; 2024 May; 33(5):1809-1819. PubMed ID: 38031387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Meta-analysis to Evaluate the Predictive Validity of the Braden Scale for Pressure Ulcer Risk Assessment in Long-term Care.
    Chen HL; Shen WQ; Liu P
    Ostomy Wound Manage; 2016 Sep; 62(9):20-8. PubMed ID: 27668477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Validity of the Waterlow scale for pressure ulcer risk assessment in the intensive care unit: a prospective analysis of 698 patients].
    Compton F; Strauss M; Hortig T; Frey J; Hoffmann F; Zidek W; Schäfer JH
    Pflege; 2008 Feb; 21(1):37-48. PubMed ID: 18478685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pressure ulcers: validation of two risk assessment scales.
    Defloor T; Grypdonck MF
    J Clin Nurs; 2005 Mar; 14(3):373-82. PubMed ID: 15707448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the pressure ulcers risk scales with critically ill patients: a prospective cohort study.
    Borghardt AT; Prado TN; Araújo TM; Rogenski NM; Bringuente ME
    Rev Lat Am Enfermagem; 2015; 23(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 25806628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predicting pressure sore risk with the Norton, Braden, and Waterlow scales in a Hong Kong rehabilitation hospital.
    Pang SM; Wong TK
    Nurs Res; 1998; 47(3):147-53. PubMed ID: 9610648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prospective cohort study of routine use of risk assessment scales for prediction of pressure ulcers.
    Schoonhoven L; Haalboom JR; Bousema MT; Algra A; Grobbee DE; Grypdonck MH; Buskens E;
    BMJ; 2002 Oct; 325(7368):797. PubMed ID: 12376437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.