These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9619928)
1. Tantalum ball position after total hip arthroplasty. Eldridge JD; Avramidis K; Lee M; Learmonth ID J Bone Joint Surg Br; 1998 May; 80(3):414-6. PubMed ID: 9619928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Insertion of tantalum beads in RSA of the hip: variations in incidence of extra-osseous beads with insertion site. Lawrie DF; Downing MR; Ashcroft GP; Gibson PH Acta Orthop Scand; 2003 Aug; 74(4):404-7. PubMed ID: 14521289 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Use of porous tantalum components in Paprosky two and three acetabular revision. A minimum five-year follow-up of fifty one hips. Flecher X; Appy B; Parratte S; Ollivier M; Argenson JN Int Orthop; 2017 May; 41(5):911-916. PubMed ID: 27766385 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Movement patterns of the C-stem femoral component: an RSA study of 33 primary total hip arthroplasties followed for two years. Sundberg M; Besjakov J; von Schewelow T; Carlsson A J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2005 Oct; 87(10):1352-6. PubMed ID: 16189306 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Total hip arthroplasty following failure of tantalum rod implantation for osteonecrosis of the femoral head with 5- to 10-year follow-up. Cheng Q; Tang JL; Gu JJ; Guo KJ; Guo WS; Wang BL; Zhao FC BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2018 Aug; 19(1):289. PubMed ID: 30115057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty. Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative migration of short stem prosthesis of the hip joint. Kamiński P; Szmyd J; Ambroży J; Jurek W Ortop Traumatol Rehabil; 2015; 17(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 25759153 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Total hip arthroplasty following failure of core decompression and tantalum rod implantation. Olsen M; Lewis PM; Morrison Z; McKee MD; Waddell JP; Schemitsch EH Bone Joint J; 2016 Sep; 98-B(9):1175-9. PubMed ID: 27587516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Revision total hip arthroplasty in patients with extensive proximal femoral bone loss using a fluted tapered modular femoral component. Amanatullah DF; Howard JL; Siman H; Trousdale RT; Mabry TM; Berry DJ Bone Joint J; 2015 Mar; 97-B(3):312-7. PubMed ID: 25737513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Radiological evaluation of the metal-bone interface of a porous tantalum monoblock acetabular component. Macheras GA; Papagelopoulos PJ; Kateros K; Kostakos AT; Baltas D; Karachalios TS J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2006 Mar; 88(3):304-9. PubMed ID: 16498001 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Good diagnostic performance of early migration as a predictor of late aseptic loosening of acetabular cups: results from ten years of follow-up with Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA). Nieuwenhuijse MJ; Valstar ER; Kaptein BL; Nelissen RG J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2012 May; 94(10):874-80. PubMed ID: 22617914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cementless Total Hip Arthroplasty Involving Trochanteric Osteotomy without Subtrochanteric Shortening for High Hip Dislocation. Lee SJ; Yoo JJ; Kim HJ Clin Orthop Surg; 2017 Mar; 9(1):19-28. PubMed ID: 28261423 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tantalum rod implantation for femoral head osteonecrosis: survivorship analysis and determination of prognostic factors for total hip arthroplasty. Liu Y; Yan L; Zhou S; Su X; Cao Y; Wang C; Liu S Int Orthop; 2016 Jul; 40(7):1397-407. PubMed ID: 26257275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Primary hybrid total hip replacement, performed with insertion of the acetabular component without cement and a precoat femoral component with cement. An average ten-year follow-up study. Clohisy JC; Harris WH J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Feb; 81(2):247-55. PubMed ID: 10073588 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Primary total hip arthroplasty with use of the modular S-ROM prosthesis. Four to seven-year clinical and radiographic results. Christie MJ; DeBoer DK; Trick LW; Brothers JC; Jones RE; Vise GT; Gruen TA J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1999 Dec; 81(12):1707-16. PubMed ID: 10608382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Trabecular metal cup without augments for acetabular revision in case of extensive bone loss and low bone-prosthesis contact. Pierannunzii L; Mambretti A; D'Imporzano M Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol; 2011; 24(1 Suppl 2):133-7. PubMed ID: 21669152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years. Macheras GA; Lepetsos P; Leonidou AO; Anastasopoulos PP; Galanakos SP; Poultsides LA J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3680-3684. PubMed ID: 28734611 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reconstruction of acetabular defects with porous tantalum shells and augments in revision total hip arthroplasty at ten-year follow-up. Löchel J; Janz V; Hipfl C; Perka C; Wassilew GI Bone Joint J; 2019 Mar; 101-B(3):311-316. PubMed ID: 30813786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Metal-on-metal total hip resurfacing arthroplasty in the presence of extra-articular deformities or implants. Mont MA; McGrath MS; Ulrich SD; Seyler TM; Marker DR; Delanois RE J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2008 Aug; 90 Suppl 3():45-51. PubMed ID: 18676936 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]