148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9621971)
1. In vitro model of arterial stenosis: correlation of MR signal dephasing and trans-stenotic pressure gradients.
Mustert BR; Williams DM; Prince MR
Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Apr; 16(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 9621971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Diagnosis of renal artery stenosis with magnetic resonance angiography and stenosis quantification].
Marchand B; Hernandez-Hoyos M; Orkisz M; Douek P
J Mal Vasc; 2000 Dec; 25(5):312-320. PubMed ID: 11148391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Objective stenosis quantification from post-stenotic signal loss in phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiographic datasets of flow phantoms and renal arteries.
Westenberg JJ; van der Geest RJ; Wasser MN; Doornbos J; Pattynama PM; de Roos A; Vanderschoot J; Reiber JH
Magn Reson Imaging; 1998 Apr; 16(3):249-60. PubMed ID: 9621966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of renal transplants.
Johnson DB; Lerner CA; Prince MR; Kazanjian SN; Narasimham DL; Leichtman AB; Cho KJ
Magn Reson Imaging; 1997; 15(1):13-20. PubMed ID: 9084020
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Breath-hold ultrafast three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the aorta and the renal and other visceral abdominal arteries.
Holland GA; Dougherty L; Carpenter JP; Golden MA; Gilfeather M; Slossman F; Schnall MD; Axel L
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Apr; 166(4):971-81. PubMed ID: 8610584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delineation of simulated vascular stenosis with Gd-DTPA-enhanced 3D gradient echo MR angiography: an experimental study.
Mitsuzaki K; Yamashita Y; Onomichi M; Tsuchigame T; Takahashi M
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2000; 24(1):77-82. PubMed ID: 10667664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Renal MR angiography: a comprehensive approach.
Prince MR
J Magn Reson Imaging; 1998; 8(3):511-6. PubMed ID: 9626863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Voxel sensitivity function description of flow-induced signal loss in MR imaging: implications for black-blood MR angiography with turbo spin-echo sequences.
Jara H; Yu BC; Caruthers SD; Melhem ER; Yucel EK
Magn Reson Med; 1999 Mar; 41(3):575-90. PubMed ID: 10204883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intra-arterial MR-angiography on an open-bore MR-scanner compared to digital-subtraction angiography of the infra-popliteal runoff in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
Huegli RW; Thalhammer C; Jacob AL; Jaeger K; Bilecen D
Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jun; 66(3):519-25. PubMed ID: 17658713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, digital subtraction angiography and duplex of the iliac arteries compared with intra-arterial pressure gradient measurements.
Wikström J; Holmberg A; Johansson L; Löfberg AM; Smedby O; Karacagil S; Ahlström H
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2000 May; 19(5):516-23. PubMed ID: 10828234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nonenhanced methods for lower-extremity MRA: a phantom study examining the effects of stenosis and pathologic flow waveforms at 1.5T.
Offerman EJ; Hodnett PA; Edelman RR; Koktzoglou I
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2011 Feb; 33(2):401-8. PubMed ID: 21274982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [MR angiography of the heart and thoracic blood vessels. Use of rapid ECG-triggered techniques with multiplanar reconstruction capability].
Seelos KC; von Smekal A; Steinborn M; Gieseke J; Kaas P; Urban J; Redel DA; Reiser M
Radiologe; 1994 Aug; 34(8):454-61. PubMed ID: 7972723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Experimental evaluation of vessel diameter from 0.3 to 8 mm in CE MR angiography].
Vosshenrich R; Engeroff B; Müller C; Fischer U; Grabbe E
Rofo; 2001 Sep; 173(9):842-7. PubMed ID: 11582565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-resolution 3D contrast-enhanced MRA with parallel imaging techniques before endovascular interventional treatment of arterial stenosis.
Lin J; Li D; Yan F
Vasc Med; 2009 Nov; 14(4):305-11. PubMed ID: 19808715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Factors influencing flow-induced signal loss in MR angiography: an in vitro study.
Fürst G; Hofer M; Sitzer M; Kahn T; Müller E; Mödder U
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(5):692-9. PubMed ID: 7560312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intracranial vascular stenosis and occlusion: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and 3D phase-contrast MR angiography.
Oelerich M; Lentschig MG; Zunker P; Reimer P; Rummeny EJ; Schuierer G
Neuroradiology; 1998 Sep; 40(9):567-73. PubMed ID: 9808312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultra-short echo-time 2D time-of-flight MR angiography using a half-pulse excitation.
Nielsen HT; Gold GE; Olcott EW; Pauly JM; Nishimura DG
Magn Reson Med; 1999 Mar; 41(3):591-9. PubMed ID: 10204884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment of popliteal arterial occlusive disease with 2D time-of-flight MRA.
Masui T; Caputo GR; Bowersox JC; Higgins CB
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1995; 19(3):449-54. PubMed ID: 7790557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Arterial spin labeled carotid MR angiography: A phantom study examining the impact of technical and hemodynamic factors.
Koktzoglou I; Giri S; Piccini D; Grodzki DM; Flanagan O; Murphy IG; Gupta N; Collins JD; Edelman RR
Magn Reson Med; 2016 Jan; 75(1):295-301. PubMed ID: 25684192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 0.125 mm(3) spatial resolution steady-state MR angiography of the thighs with a blood pool contrast agent using the quadrature body coil only at 1.5 Tesla.
Boschewitz JM; Hadizadeh DR; Kukuk GM; Meyer C; Wilhelm K; Koscielny A; Verrel F; Gieseke J; Schild HH; Willinek WA
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Oct; 40(4):996-1001. PubMed ID: 24845363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]