These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9623392)

  • 1. Survey of UK computerised special needs registers.
    Hutchison T; Harpin V
    Arch Dis Child; 1998 Apr; 78(4):312-5. PubMed ID: 9623392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Using existing population-based data sets to measure the American Academy of Pediatrics definition of medical home for all children and children with special health care needs.
    Bethell CD; Read D; Brockwood K;
    Pediatrics; 2004 May; 113(5 Suppl):1529-37. PubMed ID: 15121922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Completeness of follow up in a cohort study of mortality using the United Kingdom National Health Service Central Registers and records held by the Department of Social Security.
    Darby SC; O'Hagan JA; Kendall GM; Doll R; Fell TP; Muirhead CR
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1991 Mar; 45(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 2045748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Meeting the needs of parents around the time of diagnosis of disability among their children: evaluation of a novel program for information, support, and liaison by key workers.
    Rahi JS; Manaras I; Tuomainen H; Hundt GL
    Pediatrics; 2004 Oct; 114(4):e477-82. PubMed ID: 15466074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Establishing best practice in seating assessment for children with physical disabilities using qualitative methodologies.
    Wright C; Casey J; Porter-Armstrong A
    Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol; 2010 Jan; 5(1):34-47. PubMed ID: 19941439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Well-informed by national registers? A comparison of national ART registers in Germany, France and the United Kingdom.
    Kadi S; Wiesing U
    Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care; 2017 Dec; 22(6):465-471. PubMed ID: 29300117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What are children's trusts? Early findings from a national survey.
    Bachmann MO; Reading R; Husbands C; O'Brien M; Thoburn J; Shemilt I; Watson J; Jones N; Haynes R; Mugford M;
    Child Care Health Dev; 2006 Mar; 32(2):137-46. PubMed ID: 16441848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accident and emergency department access to the child protection register: a questionnaire survey.
    Quin G; Evans R
    Emerg Med J; 2002 Mar; 19(2):136-7. PubMed ID: 11904260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A review of community dental service provision for children attending special day schools.
    Gunn ER; White DA; Brooks JA
    Community Dent Health; 2003 Mar; 20(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 12688599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The use of family health services authority registers as a sampling frame in the UK: a review of theory and practice.
    Roberts HR; Rushton L; Muir KR; Dengler R; Coupland CA; Jenkinson CM; Ruffell A; Chilvers CE
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1995 Aug; 49(4):344-7. PubMed ID: 7650456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Disabled children in the UK: a quality assessment of quantitative data sources.
    Read J; Blackburn C; Spencer N
    Child Care Health Dev; 2010 Jan; 36(1):130-41. PubMed ID: 19735266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Update on the harmonisation of disability data collection in UK surveys (part 1).
    White C
    Health Stat Q; 2011; (51):3-30. PubMed ID: 21894156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Screening: completeness of population registers a problem for some sub-groups.
    Lowry RJ; Harvey J
    J Public Health Med; 1999 Sep; 21(3):360-1. PubMed ID: 10528970
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Taking stock of the CSHCN screener: a review of common questions and current reflections.
    Bethell CD; Blumberg SJ; Stein RE; Strickland B; Robertson J; Newacheck PW
    Acad Pediatr; 2015; 15(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 25486969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluating child disability programmes: the role of commissioners.
    Davidson LL
    Child Care Health Dev; 1999 Mar; 25(2):129-39. PubMed ID: 10188067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Designing and recruiting to UK autism spectrum disorder research databases: do they include representative children with valid ASD diagnoses?
    Warnell F; George B; McConachie H; Johnson M; Hardy R; Parr JR
    BMJ Open; 2015 Sep; 5(9):e008625. PubMed ID: 26341584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the quality of health technology registers for national guidance development.
    Mandeville KL; Patrick H; McKenna T; Harris K
    Eur J Public Health; 2018 Apr; 28(2):220-223. PubMed ID: 29020400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Update on the harmonisation of disability data collection in UK surveys (part 2).
    White C
    Health Stat Q; 2011; (51):31-66. PubMed ID: 21894157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Lifetime prevalence of learning disability among US children.
    Altarac M; Saroha E
    Pediatrics; 2007 Feb; 119 Suppl 1():S77-83. PubMed ID: 17272589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of services for children with complex needs: mapping service provision in one NHS Trust.
    Brooks F; Bloomfield L; Offredy M; Shaughnessy P
    Prim Health Care Res Dev; 2013 Jan; 14(1):52-62. PubMed ID: 22784821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.