These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9623660)

  • 21. Phenomenological dose model for therapeutic photon beams: basic concepts and definitions.
    Nizin PS
    Med Phys; 1999 Sep; 26(9):1893-900. PubMed ID: 10505878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Physical factors affecting absorbed dose to the skin from cobalt-60 gamma rays and 25-MV x rays.
    Gagnon WF; Horton JL
    Med Phys; 1979; 6(4):285-90. PubMed ID: 113655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Measurement of backscattered x-ray spectra at the water surface in the energy range 60 kV to 120 kV.
    Aoki K; Koyama M
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Apr; 47(7):1205-17. PubMed ID: 11996064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Monte Carlo dose calculations for radiotherapy machines: Theratron 780-C teletherapy case study.
    Sichani BT; Sohrabpour M
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Mar; 49(5):807-18. PubMed ID: 15070204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurements of dose from secondary radiation outside a treatment field.
    Kase KR; Svensson GK; Wolbarst AB; Marks MA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1983 Aug; 9(8):1177-83. PubMed ID: 6409854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Characteristics of kilovoltage x-ray beams used for cone-beam computed tomography in radiation therapy.
    Ding GX; Duggan DM; Coffey CW
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 52(6):1595-615. PubMed ID: 17327651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Orthovoltage radiation therapy treatment planning using Monte Carlo simulation: treatment of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the maxillary sinus.
    Gao W; Raeside DE
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2421-33. PubMed ID: 9434298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Refined gypsum effective attenuation coefficients for Co-60, 6 MV, 10 MV and 18 MV x-rays.
    Glasgow GP; Dogan N; Sethi A; Stanton J
    Phys Med Biol; 2003 Jan; 48(1):63-71. PubMed ID: 12564501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Backscatter dose perturbation at high atomic number interfaces in megavoltage photon beams.
    Das IJ; Kahn FM
    Med Phys; 1989; 16(3):367-75. PubMed ID: 2500585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Dependence of overall correction factor of a cylindrical ionization chamber on field size and depth in medium-energy x-ray beams.
    Seuntjens J; Verhaegen F
    Med Phys; 1996 Oct; 23(10):1789-96. PubMed ID: 8946375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Dose rate constant of a cesium-131 interstitial brachytherapy seed measured by thermoluminescent dosimetry and gamma-ray spectrometry.
    Chen Z; Bongiorni P; Nath R
    Med Phys; 2005 Nov; 32(11):3279-85. PubMed ID: 16372409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Measurements of electron beam peak scatter factors.
    Ding GX; Cygler JE
    Med Phys; 1998 Feb; 25(2):251-3. PubMed ID: 9507489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Backscatter factors and mass energy-absorption coefficient ratios for diagnostic radiology dosimetry.
    Benmakhlouf H; Bouchard H; Fransson A; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Nov; 56(22):7179-204. PubMed ID: 22024474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Electron disequilibrium in high-energy x-ray beams.
    Hannallah D; Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE
    Med Phys; 1996 Nov; 23(11):1867-71. PubMed ID: 8947900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Analytical approach to heterogeneity correction factor calculation for brachytherapy.
    Daskalov GM; Kirov AS; Williamson JF
    Med Phys; 1998 May; 25(5):722-35. PubMed ID: 9608484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mass attenuation coefficient of tannin-added Rhizophora spp. particleboards at 16.59-25.56 keV photons, and
    Yusof MFM; Hamid PNKA; Tajuddin AA; Hashim R; Bauk S; Isa NM; Isa MJM
    Radiol Phys Technol; 2017 Sep; 10(3):331-339. PubMed ID: 28718054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Is there a need for a revised table of equivalent square fields for the determination of phantom scatter correction factors?
    Venselaar JL; Heukelom S; Jager HN; Mijnheer BJ; van Gasteren JJ; van Kleffens HJ; van der Laarse R; Westermann CF
    Phys Med Biol; 1997 Dec; 42(12):2369-81. PubMed ID: 9434294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Measurements of phantom scatter factors for small field sizes in high energy x rays.
    Haider TK; el-Khatib EE
    Med Phys; 1994 May; 21(5):663-6. PubMed ID: 7935201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photon scatter in portal images: accuracy of a fluence based pencil beam superposition algorithm.
    McCurdy BM; Pistorius S
    Med Phys; 2000 May; 27(5):913-22. PubMed ID: 10841394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analysis of central-axis doses for high-energy x rays.
    Bjärngard BE; Vadash P
    Med Phys; 1995 Jul; 22(7):1191-5. PubMed ID: 7565394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.