180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9623822)
1. A comparison of morbidity from bilateral, unipedicled and unilateral, unipedicled TRAM flap breast reconstructions.
Paige KT; Bostwick J; Bried JT; Jones G
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Jun; 101(7):1819-27. PubMed ID: 9623822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Delay in unipedicled TRAM flap reconstruction of the breast: a review of 76 consecutive cases.
Erdmann D; Sundin BM; Moquin KJ; Young H; Georgiade GS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Sep; 110(3):762-7. PubMed ID: 12172136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.
Moran SL; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2001 Dec; 108(7):1954-60; discussion 1961-2. PubMed ID: 11743383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of smoking on complications in patients undergoing free TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Chang DW; Reece GP; Wang B; Robb GL; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Jun; 105(7):2374-80. PubMed ID: 10845289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Free versus the pedicled TRAM flap: a cost comparison and outcome analysis.
Serletti JM; Moran SL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1997 Nov; 100(6):1418-24; discussion 1425-7. PubMed ID: 9385952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction.
Spear SL; Ducic I; Cuoco F; Taylor N
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Mar; 119(3):788-95. PubMed ID: 17312479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The midabdominal TRAM flap for breast reconstruction in morbidly obese patients.
Gabbay JS; Eby JB; Kulber DA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Mar; 115(3):764-70. PubMed ID: 15731676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fat necrosis in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous and deep inferior epigastric perforator flaps.
Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Sep; 106(3):576-83. PubMed ID: 10987463
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.
Vyas RM; Dickinson BP; Fastekjian JH; Watson JP; DaLio AL; Crisera CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 18453973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Late results of breast reconstruction with free TRAM flaps: a prospective multicentric study.
Banic A; Boeckx W; Greulich M; Guelickx P; Marchi A; Rigotti G; Tschopp H
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Jun; 95(7):1195-204; discussion 1205-6. PubMed ID: 7761506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Technical variations of the bipedicled TRAM flap in unilateral breast reconstruction: effects of conventional versus microsurgical techniques of pedicle transfer on complications rates.
Ng RL; Youssef A; Kronowitz SJ; Lipa JE; Potochny J; Reece GP
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Aug; 114(2):374-84; discussion 385-8. PubMed ID: 15277802
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Autologous breast reconstruction with use of transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous flap: Mayo clinic experience with 147 cases.
Jacobsen WM; Meland NB; Woods JE
Mayo Clin Proc; 1994 Jul; 69(7):635-40. PubMed ID: 8015326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. TRAM flap anatomy correlated with a 10-year clinical experience with 556 patients.
Watterson PA; Bostwick J; Hester TR; Bried JT; Taylor GI
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1995 Jun; 95(7):1185-94. PubMed ID: 7761505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Abdominal wall morbidity following unilateral and bilateral breast reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps: an outcomes analysis of 117 consecutive patients.
Ascherman JA; Seruya M; Bartsich SA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jan; 121(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 18176197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Superiority of the microvascularly augmented flap: analysis of 50 transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flaps for breast reconstruction.
Yamamoto Y; Nohira K; Sugihara T; Shintomi Y; Ohura T
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1996 Jan; 97(1):79-83; discussion 84-5. PubMed ID: 8532809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Flap Failure and Wound Complications in Autologous Breast Reconstruction: A National Perspective.
Massenburg BB; Sanati-Mehrizy P; Ingargiola MJ; Rosa JH; Taub PJ
Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2015 Dec; 39(6):902-9. PubMed ID: 26487657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
