These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9623897)

  • 1. Working parameters of a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Periodontol; 1998 May; 69(5):547-53. PubMed ID: 9623897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of working parameters on root substance removal using a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaler in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    J Clin Periodontol; 1998 Feb; 25(2):158-63. PubMed ID: 9495615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working parameters of a sonic scaler influencing root substance removal in vitro.
    Flemmig TF; Petersilka GJ; Mehl A; Rüdiger S; Hickel R; Klaiber B
    Clin Oral Investig; 1997 Jun; 1(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 9552818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Significant influence of scaler tip design on root substance loss resulting from ultrasonic scaling: a laserprofilometric in vitro study.
    Jepsen S; Ayna M; Hedderich J; Eberhard J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Nov; 31(11):1003-6. PubMed ID: 15491317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of parameters on root surface roughness following treatment with a magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler: an in vitro study.
    Folwaczny M; Merkel U; Mehl A; Hickel R
    J Periodontol; 2004 Sep; 75(9):1221-6. PubMed ID: 15515337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Influence of tip wear of piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers on root surface roughness at different working parameters. A profilometric and atomic force microscopy study.
    Arabaci T; Cicek Y; Dilsiz A; Erdogan İY; Kose O; Kizildağ A
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2013 Feb; 11(1):69-74. PubMed ID: 23033943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrasonic scaler oscillations and tooth-surface defects.
    Lea SC; Felver B; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Dent Res; 2009 Mar; 88(3):229-34. PubMed ID: 19329455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Root surface defect produced by hand instruments and ultrasonic scaler with different power settings: an in vitro study.
    Casarin RC; Ribeiro FV; Sallum AW; Sallum EA; Nociti FH; Casati MZ
    Braz Dent J; 2009; 20(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 19466233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Safety and efficiency of novel sonic scaler tips in vitro.
    Petersilka GJ; Draenert M; Mehl A; Hickel R; Flemmig TF
    J Clin Periodontol; 2003 Jun; 30(6):551-5. PubMed ID: 12795794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Piezoelectric Ultrasonic Scaler Tip Wear on Root Surface Roughness at Different Working Parameters: An Atomic Force Microscopic and Profilometric Study.
    Vengatachalapathi H; Naik R; Rao R; Venugopal R; Nichani AS
    J Int Acad Periodontol; 2017 Jan; 19(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 31473708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparative in vitro study of a magnetostrictive and a piezoelectric ultrasonic scaling instrument.
    Busslinger A; Lampe K; Beuchat M; Lehmann B
    J Clin Periodontol; 2001 Jul; 28(7):642-9. PubMed ID: 11422585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of root surface instrumentation using two piezoelectric ultrasonic scalers and a hand scaler in vivo.
    Kawashima H; Sato S; Kishida M; Ito K
    J Periodontal Res; 2007 Feb; 42(1):90-5. PubMed ID: 17214645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative clinical responses related to the use of various periodontal instrumentation.
    Obeid PR; D'Hoore W; Bercy P
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 Mar; 31(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 15016023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of loading on the vibration characteristics of thin magnetostrictive ultrasonic scaler inserts.
    Trenter SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Periodontol; 2003 Sep; 74(9):1308-15. PubMed ID: 14584863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Thermal imaging of ultrasonic scaler tips during tooth instrumentation.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2004 May; 31(5):370-5. PubMed ID: 15086619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vitro effectiveness of a newly-designed ultrasonic scaler tip for furcation areas.
    Oda S; Ishikawa I
    J Periodontol; 1989 Nov; 60(11):634-9. PubMed ID: 2689626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of wear on ultrasonic scaler tip displacement amplitude.
    Lea SC; Landini G; Walmsley AD
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Jan; 33(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 16367854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of root surface microtopography following the use of four instrumentation systems by confocal microscopy and scanning electron microscopy: an in vitro study.
    Solís Moreno C; Santos A; Nart J; Levi P; Velásquez A; Sanz Moliner J
    J Periodontal Res; 2012 Oct; 47(5):608-15. PubMed ID: 22494068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.