113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9624703)
21. Feeling-of-knowing judgments from the subject's perspective.
Widner RL; Smith SM
Am J Psychol; 1996; 109(3):373-87. PubMed ID: 8837408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Underlying mechanisms of initial feelings of knowing in children.
Besner NR; Son LK
Scand J Psychol; 2007 Dec; 48(6):449-57. PubMed ID: 18028067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Judgments of learning enhance recall for category-cued but not letter-cued items.
Rivers ML; Dunlosky J; Janes JL; Witherby AE; Tauber SK
Mem Cognit; 2023 Oct; 51(7):1547-1561. PubMed ID: 37173589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exploring a mnemonic debiasing account of the underconfidence-with-practice effect.
Koriat A; Ma'ayan H; Sheffer L; Bjork RA
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 May; 32(3):595-608. PubMed ID: 16719669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of proactive interference during spoken cued recall.
Henson RN; Shallice T; Josephs O; Dolan RJ
Neuroimage; 2002 Oct; 17(2):543-58. PubMed ID: 12377133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects?
Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The cue-familiarity heuristic in metacognition.
Metcalfe J; Schwartz BL; Joaquim SG
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1993 Jul; 19(4):851-61. PubMed ID: 8345327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Recognition is used as one cue among others in judgment and decision making.
Richter T; Späth P
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2006 Jan; 32(1):150-62. PubMed ID: 16478347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Response speeding mediates the contributions of cue familiarity and target retrievability to metamnemonic judgments.
Benjamin AS
Psychon Bull Rev; 2005 Oct; 12(5):874-9. PubMed ID: 16524004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Remember/know judgments probe degrees of recollection.
Wais PE; Mickes L; Wixted JT
J Cogn Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 20(3):400-5. PubMed ID: 18004949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Event-related potential correlates of proactive interference in schizophrenic patients and controls.
Rössner P; Rockstroh B; Cohen R; Wagner M; Elbert T
Psychophysiology; 1999 Mar; 36(2):199-208. PubMed ID: 10194967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Masked target priming effects on feeling-of-knowing and feeling-of-familiarity judgments.
Kinoshita S
Acta Psychol (Amst); 1997 Nov; 97(2):183-99. PubMed ID: 9466239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Metamemory in a familiar place: The effects of environmental context on feeling of knowing.
Hanczakowski M; Zawadzka K; Collie H; Macken B
J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2017 Jan; 43(1):59-71. PubMed ID: 27280853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Feelings of knowing in the Ranschburg effect.
Florer FL; Allen G
Am J Psychol; 2000; 113(2):179-98. PubMed ID: 10862341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Activation of human hippocampal formation reflects success in both encoding and cued recall of paired associates.
Meltzer JA; Constable RT
Neuroimage; 2005 Jan; 24(2):384-97. PubMed ID: 15627581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Support for an auto-associative model of spoken cued recall: evidence from fMRI.
de Zubicaray G; McMahon K; Eastburn M; Pringle AJ; Lorenz L; Humphreys MS
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Mar; 45(4):824-35. PubMed ID: 16989874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. How many dimensions underlie judgments of learning and recall? Evidence from state-trace methodology.
Jang Y; Nelson TO
J Exp Psychol Gen; 2005 Aug; 134(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 16131266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Inner speech as a retrieval aid for task goals: the effects of cue type and articulatory suppression in the random task cuing paradigm.
Miyake A; Emerson MJ; Padilla F; Ahn JC
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2004; 115(2-3):123-42. PubMed ID: 14962397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cue patterns and alcohol expectancies: how slight differences in stimuli can measurably change cognition.
Reich RR; Noll JA; Goldman MS
Exp Clin Psychopharmacol; 2005 Feb; 13(1):65-71. PubMed ID: 15727505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The relationship between study processing and the effects of cue congruency at retrieval: fMRI support for transfer appropriate processing.
Park H; Rugg MD
Cereb Cortex; 2008 Apr; 18(4):868-75. PubMed ID: 17652467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
