BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9624757)

  • 1. Cluster randomization: a trap for the unwary.
    Underwood M; Barnett A; Hajioff S
    Br J Gen Pract; 1998 Mar; 48(428):1089-90. PubMed ID: 9624757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Design of cluster-randomized trials of quality improvement interventions aimed at medical care providers.
    Glynn RJ; Brookhart MA; Stedman M; Avorn J; Solomon DH
    Med Care; 2007 Oct; 45(10 Supl 2):S38-43. PubMed ID: 17909381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sample size re-estimation in cluster randomization trials.
    Lake S; Kammann E; Klar N; Betensky R
    Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(10):1337-50. PubMed ID: 12185888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of cluster randomization on sample size in prevention research.
    Baskerville NB; Hogg W; Lemelin J
    J Fam Pract; 2001 Mar; 50(3):W241-6. PubMed ID: 11252223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Issues in the meta-analysis of cluster randomized trials.
    Donner A; Klar N
    Stat Med; 2002 Oct; 21(19):2971-80. PubMed ID: 12325113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of cluster-randomized trials on maternal and child health research in developing countries.
    Handlos LN; Chakraborty H; Sen PK
    Trop Med Int Health; 2009 Aug; 14(8):947-56. PubMed ID: 19563429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: an introduction.
    Murphy AW; Esterman A; Pilotto LS
    Eur J Gen Pract; 2006; 12(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 16945880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sample size calculations for 3-level cluster randomized trials.
    Teerenstra S; Moerbeek M; van Achterberg T; Pelzer BJ; Borm GF
    Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):486-95. PubMed ID: 18827041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Planning a cluster randomized controlled trial: methodological issues.
    Christie J; O'Halloran P; Stevenson M
    Nurs Res; 2009; 58(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19289934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An integrated population-averaged approach to the design, analysis and sample size determination of cluster-unit trials.
    Preisser JS; Young ML; Zaccaro DJ; Wolfson M
    Stat Med; 2003 Apr; 22(8):1235-54. PubMed ID: 12687653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparing completely and stratified randomized designs in cluster randomized trials when the stratifying factor is cluster size: a simulation study.
    Lewsey JD
    Stat Med; 2004 Mar; 23(6):897-905. PubMed ID: 15027079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Methods for modelling change in cluster randomization trials.
    Klar N; Darlington G
    Stat Med; 2004 Aug; 23(15):2341-57. PubMed ID: 15273952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison of confidence interval methods for the intraclass correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials.
    Ukoumunne OC
    Stat Med; 2002 Dec; 21(24):3757-74. PubMed ID: 12483765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Intraclass correlation coefficients for cluster randomized trials in primary care: the cholesterol education and research trial (CEART).
    Parker DR; Evangelou E; Eaton CB
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2005 Apr; 26(2):260-7. PubMed ID: 15837446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intracluster correlation coefficients in cluster randomized trials: empirical insights into how should they be reported.
    Campbell MK; Grimshaw JM; Elbourne DR
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Apr; 4():9. PubMed ID: 15115554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sample size calculator for cluster randomized trials.
    Campbell MK; Thomson S; Ramsay CR; MacLennan GS; Grimshaw JM
    Comput Biol Med; 2004 Mar; 34(2):113-25. PubMed ID: 14972631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the statistical power of different methods for the analysis of cluster randomization trials with binary outcomes.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Aug; 26(19):3550-65. PubMed ID: 17238238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Epidemiology and reporting of randomized trials employing re-randomization of patient groups: a systematic survey.
    Mills EJ; Kelly S; Wu P; Guyatt GH
    Contemp Clin Trials; 2007 May; 28(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 17067857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual allocation had an advantage over cluster randomization in statistical efficiency in some circumstances.
    Hewitt CE; Torgerson DJ; Miles JN
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Oct; 61(10):1004-8. PubMed ID: 18411038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.