These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9624809)

  • 1. Assessing transfer probabilities in a Bayesian interpretation of forensic glass evidence.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton JS; Walsh K; Hicks T
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 9624809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Combining a continuous Bayesian approach with grouping information.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J; Coulson S
    Forensic Sci Int; 1998 Feb; 91(3):181-96. PubMed ID: 9530830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sampling in forensic comparison problems.
    Curran JM; Triggs CM; Buckleton J
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(2):101-7. PubMed ID: 9624819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Probabilistic reasoning in the law. Part 2: Assessment of probabilities and explanation of the value of trace evidence other than DNA.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):179-88. PubMed ID: 9800433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A graphical model for the evaluation of cross-transfer evidence in DNA profiles.
    Aitken C; Taroni F; Garbolino P
    Theor Popul Biol; 2003 May; 63(3):179-90. PubMed ID: 12689790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The distribution of glass fragments in front of a broken window and the transfer of fragments to individuals standing nearby.
    Pounds CA; Smalldon KW
    J Forensic Sci Soc; 1978; 18(3-4):197-203. PubMed ID: 753918
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of scientific evidence using Bayesian networks.
    Garbolino P; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2002 Feb; 125(2-3):149-55. PubMed ID: 11909657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The likelihood approach to compare populations: a study on DNA evidence and pitfalls of intuitions.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Sci Justice; 1999; 39(4):213-22. PubMed ID: 10795411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lies, damned lies, and DNA statistics: DNA match testing Bayes' Theorem, and the criminal courts.
    Jowett C
    Med Sci Law; 2001 Jul; 41(3):194-205. PubMed ID: 11506343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Bayesian mixture modelling for glass refractive index measurement.
    Wen Z; Curran JM; Harbison SA; Wevers G
    Sci Justice; 2021 Jul; 61(4):345-355. PubMed ID: 34172123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. DNA commission of the International society for forensic genetics: Assessing the value of forensic biological evidence - Guidelines highlighting the importance of propositions. Part II: Evaluation of biological traces considering activity level propositions.
    Gill P; Hicks T; Butler JM; Connolly E; Gusmão L; Kokshoorn B; Morling N; van Oorschot RAH; Parson W; Prinz M; Schneider PM; Sijen T; Taylor D
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2020 Jan; 44():102186. PubMed ID: 31677444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. DNA evidence, probabilistic evaluation and collaborative tests.
    Taroni F; Aitken CG
    Forensic Sci Int; 2000 Feb; 108(2):121-43. PubMed ID: 10722199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Application of the Bayesian framework for forensic interpretation to casework involving postmortem interval estimates of decomposed human remains.
    Andersson MG; Ceciliason AS; Sandler H; Mostad P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2019 Aug; 301():402-414. PubMed ID: 31234111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relevance of the evolution of experimental studies for the interpretation and evaluation of some trace physical evidence.
    Morgan RM; Cohen J; McGookin I; Murly-Gotto J; O'Connor R; Muress S; Freudiger-Bonzon J; Bull PA
    Sci Justice; 2009 Dec; 49(4):277-85. PubMed ID: 20120607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Exact solutions to Bayesian and maximum likelihood problems in facial identification when population and error distributions are known.
    Allen RJ
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Aug; 179(2-3):211-8. PubMed ID: 18639401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How the probability of a false positive affects the value of DNA evidence.
    Thompson WC; Taroni F; Aitken CG
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 Jan; 48(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 12570198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A model for case assessment and interpretation.
    Cook R; Evett IW; Jackson G; Jones PJ; Lambert JA
    Sci Justice; 1998; 38(3):151-6. PubMed ID: 9800430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Recent misconceptions about the 'database search problem': a probabilistic analysis using Bayesian networks.
    Biedermann A; Gittelson S; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Oct; 212(1-3):51-60. PubMed ID: 21664776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bayesian interpretation of discrete class characteristics.
    McNevin D
    Forensic Sci Int; 2018 Nov; 292():125-130. PubMed ID: 30296628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the Bayesian approach to forensic age estimation of living individuals.
    Sironi E; Vuille J; Morling N; Taroni F
    Forensic Sci Int; 2017 Dec; 281():e24-e29. PubMed ID: 29162298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.