128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9625048)
1. Analytical and clinical performance of a homogeneous enzymatic LDL-cholesterol assay compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method.
Rifai N; Iannotti E; DeAngelis K; Law T
Clin Chem; 1998 Jun; 44(6 Pt 1):1242-50. PubMed ID: 9625048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Analytical performance and clinical efficacy of three routine procedures for LDL cholesterol measurement compared with the ultracentrifugation-dextran sulfate-Mg(2+) method.
Nauck M; Rifai N
Clin Chim Acta; 2000 Apr; 294(1-2):77-92. PubMed ID: 10727675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of five methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hemodialysis patients(1).
Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Tzallas C; Karabina SA; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 2001 Nov; 34(8):593-602. PubMed ID: 11849617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Analytical and clinical performance of a detergent-based homogeneous LDL-cholesterol assay: a multicenter evaluation.
Nauck M; Graziani MS; Bruton D; Cobbaert C; Cole TG; Lefevre F; Riesen W; Bachorik PS; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 2000 Apr; 46(4):506-14. PubMed ID: 10759474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct measurement of LDL-C in children: performance of two surfactant-based methods in a general pediatric population.
Yu HH; Markowitz R; De Ferranti SD; Neufeld EJ; Farrow G; Bernstein HH; Rifai N
Clin Biochem; 2000 Mar; 33(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 10751585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol: a comparative assessment versus Friedewald's formula.
Türkalp I; Cil Z; Ozkazanç D
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2005 Mar; 5(1):13-7. PubMed ID: 15755695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Analytical and clinical evaluation of two homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol in hyperlipidemic patients.
Esteban-Salán M; Guimón-Bardesi A; de La Viuda-Unzueta JM; Azcarate-Ania MN; Pascual-Usandizaga P; Amoroto-Del-Río E
Clin Chem; 2000 Aug; 46(8 Pt 1):1121-31. PubMed ID: 10926892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Homogeneous HDL-cholesterol assay versus ultracentrifugation/dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation and dextran sulfate-Mg2+ precipitation in healthy population and in hemodialysis patients.
Bairaktari E; Elisaf M; Katsaraki A; Tsimihodimos V; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Tsolas O
Clin Biochem; 1999 Jul; 32(5):339-46. PubMed ID: 10480448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Analytical and clinical performance of two homogeneous assays for measuring of LDL-cholesterol.
Leowattana W; Narkrung S; Pokum S; Kiartivich S
J Med Assoc Thai; 2000 Nov; 83 Suppl 2():S6-12. PubMed ID: 11194023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three generations of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol assays compared with ultracentrifugation/dextran sulfate-Mg2+ method.
Harris N; Galpchian V; Thomas J; Iannotti E; Law T; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 1997 May; 43(5):816-23. PubMed ID: 9166236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Determination of bovine serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol using the N-geneous method.
Miyamoto T; Sugiyama Y; Suzuki J; Oohashi T; Takahashi Y
Vet Res Commun; 2006 Jul; 30(5):467-74. PubMed ID: 16755358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of an immunoprecipitation method for direct measurement of LDL-cholesterol with beta-quantification (ultracentrifugation).
Jialal I; Hirany SV; Devaraj S; Sherwood TA
Am J Clin Pathol; 1995 Jul; 104(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 7611188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analytical performance of a direct assay for LDL-cholesterol.
Smets EM; Péquériaux NC; Blaton V; Goldschmidt HM
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 Mar; 39(3):270-80. PubMed ID: 11350026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A more valid measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in diabetic patients.
Hirany S; Li D; Jialal I
Am J Med; 1997 Jan; 102(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 9209200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation and clinical application of a direct low-density lipoprotein cholesterol assay in normolipidemic and hyperlipidemic adults.
Yu HH; Ginsburg GS; Harris N; Rifai N
Am J Cardiol; 1997 Nov; 80(10):1295-9. PubMed ID: 9388101
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fasting Versus Nonfasting and Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol Accuracy.
Sathiyakumar V; Park J; Golozar A; Lazo M; Quispe R; Guallar E; Blumenthal RS; Jones SR; Martin SS
Circulation; 2018 Jan; 137(1):10-19. PubMed ID: 29038168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of direct and indirect measurement of LDL-C in HIV-infected individuals: ACTG 5087.
Evans SR; Fichtenbaum CJ; Aberg JA;
HIV Clin Trials; 2007; 8(1):45-52. PubMed ID: 17434848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of friedewald formula and modified friedewald formula with direct homogeneous assay for low density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation.
Anwar M; Khan DA; Khan FA
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2014 Jan; 24(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 24411534
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Friedewald formula underestimates LDL cholesterol at low concentrations.
Scharnagl H; Nauck M; Wieland H; März W
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2001 May; 39(5):426-31. PubMed ID: 11434393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Differences in Measured Values among Homogenous Assay Reagents of LDL-C in LP-X Positive Serum Samples].
Abe M; Kurosawa H; Sato R; Ito K; Tomono Y; Manita D; Hirowatari Y; Yoshida H
Rinsho Byori; 2015 Mar; 63(3):312-8. PubMed ID: 26524853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
