128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9625048)
21. A multicenter study on the precision and accuracy of homogeneous assays for LDL-cholesterol: comparison with a beta-quantification method using fresh serum obtained from non-diseased and diseased subjects.
Miida T; Nishimura K; Okamura T; Hirayama S; Ohmura H; Yoshida H; Miyashita Y; Ai M; Tanaka A; Sumino H; Murakami M; Inoue I; Kayamori Y; Nakamura M; Nobori T; Miyazawa Y; Teramoto T; Yokoyama S
Atherosclerosis; 2012 Nov; 225(1):208-15. PubMed ID: 22980501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of two assays for measuring LDL cholesterol.
Maitra A; Hirany SV; Jialal I
Clin Chem; 1997 Jun; 43(6 Pt 1):1040-7. PubMed ID: 9191559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Multicentric evaluation of the homogeneous LDL-cholesterol Plus assay: comparison with beta-quantification and Friedewald formula.
Esteban-Salan M; Aguilar-Doreste JA; Arranz-Pena ML; Juve-Cuxart S; Gich-Salarich I; Zapico-Muniz E; Ordonez-Llanos J
Clin Biochem; 2008 Nov; 41(16-17):1402-9. PubMed ID: 18722364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation.
Nauck M; Warnick GR; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 2002 Feb; 48(2):236-54. PubMed ID: 11805004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Interference in a homogeneous assay for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by lipoprotein X.
Herzum I; Giehl C; Soufi M; Junclas H; Wahl HG
Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(5):667-71. PubMed ID: 17484632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population.
Tremblay AJ; Morrissette H; Gagné JM; Bergeron J; Gagné C; Couture P
Clin Biochem; 2004 Sep; 37(9):785-90. PubMed ID: 15329317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Influence of apolipoprotein E genotype on the reliability of the Friedewald formula in the estimation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations.
Tremblay AJ; Bergeron J; Gagné JM; Gagné C; Couture P
Metabolism; 2005 Aug; 54(8):1014-9. PubMed ID: 16092050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Differential reactivity of two homogeneous LDL-cholesterol methods to LDL and VLDL subfractions, as demonstrated by ultracentrifugation and HPLC.
Usui S; Kakuuchi H; Okamoto M; Mizukami Y; Okazaki M
Clin Chem; 2002 Nov; 48(11):1946-54. PubMed ID: 12406980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Homogeneous Assays for LDL-C and HDL-C are Reliable in Both the Postprandial and Fasting State.
Miida T; Nishimura K; Hirayama S; Miyamoto Y; Nakamura M; Masuda D; Yamashita S; Ushiyama M; Komori T; Fujita N; Yokoyama S; Teramoto T
J Atheroscler Thromb; 2017 Jun; 24(6):583-599. PubMed ID: 28321014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Variability in cholesterol measurements: comparison of calculated and direct LDL cholesterol determinations.
Schectman G; Patsches M; Sasse EA
Clin Chem; 1996 May; 42(5):732-7. PubMed ID: 8653899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of alternative calculation methods for determining low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in hemodialysis patients.
Bairaktari ET; Tzallas C; Kalientzidou M; Tselepis AD; Siamopoulos KC; Seferiadis KI; Elisaf MS
Clin Biochem; 2004 Oct; 37(10):937-40. PubMed ID: 15369728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Performance of four homogeneous direct methods for LDL-cholesterol.
Miller WG; Waymack PP; Anderson FP; Ethridge SF; Jayne EC
Clin Chem; 2002 Mar; 48(3):489-98. PubMed ID: 11861439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Poor applicability of the Friedewald formula in the assessment of serum LDL cholesterol for clinical purposes.
Marniemi J; Mäki J; Maatela J; Järvisalo J; Impivaara O
Clin Biochem; 1995 Jun; 28(3):285-9. PubMed ID: 7554247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Multicenter evaluation of four homogenous LDL-cholesterol assays].
Bayer P; Veinberg F; Couderc R; Cherfils C; Cambillau M; Cosson C; Fradin S; Gillery P; Steinmetz J; Legrand A; Egloff M; Beucler I
Ann Biol Clin (Paris); 2005; 63(1):27-41. PubMed ID: 15689310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Reactivity of direct assays for low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol toward charge-modified LDL in hypercholesterolemia.
Zhang B; Kawachi E; Matsunaga A; Imaizumi S; Noda K; Uehara Y; Miura S; Yoshinaga K; Kuroki M; Saku K
Circ J; 2012; 76(9):2241-8. PubMed ID: 22785328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Analytical performance and clinical utility of a direct LDL-cholesterol assay in a hyperlipidemic pediatric population.
Harris N; Neufeld EJ; Newburger JW; Ticho B; Baker A; Ginsburg GS; Rimm E; Rifai N
Clin Chem; 1996 Aug; 42(8 Pt 1):1182-8. PubMed ID: 8697574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Measurement of plasma LDL cholesterol in patients with diabetes.
Whiting MJ; Shephard MD; Tallis GA
Diabetes Care; 1997 Jan; 20(1):12-4. PubMed ID: 9028686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of a homogeneous assay for measurement of small dense LDL cholesterol.
Ito Y; Fujimura M; Ohta M; Hirano T
Clin Chem; 2011 Jan; 57(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 21051530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of four direct homogeneous methods for the measurement of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
Yamada K; Tsuji N; Fujita T; Tanaka M; Kuribayashi K; Kobayashi D; Watanabe N
Clin Lab; 2010; 56(7-8):327-33. PubMed ID: 20857897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of a new method for the direct and simultaneous assessment of LDL- and HDL-cholesterol with ultracentrifugation and established methods.
Benlian P; Cansier C; Hennache G; Khallouf O; Bayer P; Duron F; Carrat F; Couderc R; Chazouillères O; Bardet J; Bouchard P; Poupon R; Masliah J; Béréziat G
Clin Chem; 2000 Apr; 46(4):493-505. PubMed ID: 10759473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
