1095 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9625417)
1. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design.
Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Variability of laboratory test results.
Shahangian S; Cohn RD
Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Apr; 113(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 10761453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
Novis DA; Jones BA
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center.
Tsai WW; Nash DB; Seamonds B; Weir GJ
Clin Ther; 1994; 16(5):898-910; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 7859247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.
Steindel SJ; Howanitz PJ
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Oct; 121(10):1031-41. PubMed ID: 9341581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Matrix effects on proficiency testing materials. Impact on accuracy of cholesterol measurement in laboratories in the nation's largest hospital system.
Naito HK; Kwak YS; Hartfiel JL; Park JK; Travers EM; Myers GL; Ross JW; Eckfeldt JH; Hartmann AE
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 8466396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Relationships among patient age, diagnosis, hospital type, and clinical laboratory utilization.
Taylor JB
Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 15747782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. System to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: evaluation of a split-specimen design.
Shahangian S; Cohn RD; Gaunt EE; Krolak JM
Clin Chem; 1999 Feb; 45(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 9931051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing.
Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Mycobacterial tests].
Takashima T; Higuchi T
Kekkaku; 2008 Jan; 83(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 18283915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Practical solution for control of the pre-analytical phase in decentralized clinical laboratories for meeting the requirements of the medical laboratory accreditation standard DIN EN ISO 15189.
Vacata V; Jahns-Streubel G; Baldus M; Wood WG
Clin Lab; 2007; 53(3-4):211-5. PubMed ID: 17447659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
Suzuki K; Higuchi T
Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Integration of data derived from biological variation into the quality management system.
Ricós C; Alvarez V; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M
Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15234631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. T-lymphocyte immunophenotyping blind proficiency testing: a model system for CD4+ T-cells.
Francis DP; Peddecord KM; Hofherr LK; Benenson AS; Taylor RN; Schalla WO
Clin Lab Sci; 1999; 12(5):278-89. PubMed ID: 10623327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
Piver MS
Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of non-analytical factors on the quality of laboratory results.
Manochiopinij S; Sirisali K; Leelahakul P
Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():50-3. PubMed ID: 10926259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quality control practices for calcium, cholesterol, digoxin, and hemoglobin: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study in 505 hospital laboratories.
Steindel SJ; Tetrault G
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 May; 122(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9593339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Transfusion of recuperated blood in total knee arthroplasty].
Pitsaer E
Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Dec; 88(8):777-89. PubMed ID: 12503019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
