These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

1093 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9625417)

  • 1. A system to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: feasibility of a split-specimen design.
    Shahangian S; Krolak JM; Gaunt EE; Cohn RD
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):503-11. PubMed ID: 9625417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Variability of laboratory test results.
    Shahangian S; Cohn RD
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2000 Apr; 113(4):521-7. PubMed ID: 10761453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Interinstitutional comparison of bedside blood glucose monitoring program characteristics, accuracy performance, and quality control documentation: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of bedside blood glucose monitoring performed in 226 small hospitals.
    Novis DA; Jones BA
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 Jun; 122(6):495-502. PubMed ID: 9625416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Point-of-care versus central laboratory testing: an economic analysis in an academic medical center.
    Tsai WW; Nash DB; Seamonds B; Weir GJ
    Clin Ther; 1994; 16(5):898-910; discussion 854. PubMed ID: 7859247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Changes in emergency department turnaround time performance from 1990 to 1993. A comparison of two College of American Pathologists Q-probes studies.
    Steindel SJ; Howanitz PJ
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Oct; 121(10):1031-41. PubMed ID: 9341581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Matrix effects on proficiency testing materials. Impact on accuracy of cholesterol measurement in laboratories in the nation's largest hospital system.
    Naito HK; Kwak YS; Hartfiel JL; Park JK; Travers EM; Myers GL; Ross JW; Eckfeldt JH; Hartmann AE
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1993 Apr; 117(4):345-51. PubMed ID: 8466396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Relationships among patient age, diagnosis, hospital type, and clinical laboratory utilization.
    Taylor JB
    Clin Lab Sci; 2005; 18(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 15747782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. System to monitor a portion of the total testing process in medical clinics and laboratories: evaluation of a split-specimen design.
    Shahangian S; Cohn RD; Gaunt EE; Krolak JM
    Clin Chem; 1999 Feb; 45(2):269-80. PubMed ID: 9931051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Laboratory precision performance: state of the art versus operating specifications that assure the analytical quality required by clinical laboratory improvement amendments proficiency testing.
    Westgard JO; Bawa N; Ross JW; Lawson NS
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1996 Jul; 120(7):621-5. PubMed ID: 8757464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Mycobacterial tests].
    Takashima T; Higuchi T
    Kekkaku; 2008 Jan; 83(1):43-59. PubMed ID: 18283915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Practical solution for control of the pre-analytical phase in decentralized clinical laboratories for meeting the requirements of the medical laboratory accreditation standard DIN EN ISO 15189.
    Vacata V; Jahns-Streubel G; Baldus M; Wood WG
    Clin Lab; 2007; 53(3-4):211-5. PubMed ID: 17447659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Improvement of routine works and quality control in mycobacterial laboratory].
    Suzuki K; Higuchi T
    Kekkaku; 2007 Mar; 82(3):217-27. PubMed ID: 17444126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Integration of data derived from biological variation into the quality management system.
    Ricós C; Alvarez V; Cava F; García-Lario JV; Hernández A; Jiménez CV; Minchinela J; Perich C; Simón M
    Clin Chim Acta; 2004 Aug; 346(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 15234631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Analytical uncertainty--how wrong can a laboratory result be?].
    Bolann BJ; Stølsnes B
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Dec; 119(30):4472-5. PubMed ID: 10827487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. T-lymphocyte immunophenotyping blind proficiency testing: a model system for CD4+ T-cells.
    Francis DP; Peddecord KM; Hofherr LK; Benenson AS; Taylor RN; Schalla WO
    Clin Lab Sci; 1999; 12(5):278-89. PubMed ID: 10623327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prophylactic Oophorectomy: Reducing the U.S. Death Rate from Epithelial Ovarian Cancer. A Continuing Debate.
    Piver MS
    Oncologist; 1996; 1(5):326-330. PubMed ID: 10388011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of non-analytical factors on the quality of laboratory results.
    Manochiopinij S; Sirisali K; Leelahakul P
    Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health; 1999; 30 Suppl 3():50-3. PubMed ID: 10926259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality control practices for calcium, cholesterol, digoxin, and hemoglobin: a College of American Pathologists Q-probes study in 505 hospital laboratories.
    Steindel SJ; Tetrault G
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1998 May; 122(5):401-8. PubMed ID: 9593339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Safety and nutritional assessment of GM plants and derived food and feed: the role of animal feeding trials.
    EFSA GMO Panel Working Group on Animal Feeding Trials
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2008 Mar; 46 Suppl 1():S2-70. PubMed ID: 18328408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Transfusion of recuperated blood in total knee arthroplasty].
    Pitsaer E
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 2002 Dec; 88(8):777-89. PubMed ID: 12503019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 55.