186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9626475)
21. Breast biopsy: a comparative study of stereotaxically guided core and excisional techniques.
Gisvold JJ; Goellner JR; Grant CS; Donohue JH; Sykes MW; Karsell PR; Coffey SL; Jung SH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):815-20. PubMed ID: 8140997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. The predictive value of needle localization mammographically assisted biopsy of the breast.
Senofsky GM; Davies RJ; Olson L; Skully P; Olshen R
Surg Gynecol Obstet; 1990 Nov; 171(5):361-5. PubMed ID: 2237718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Cellular proliferative activity of mammographic normal dense and fatty tissue determined by DNA S phase percentage.
Stomper PC; Penetrante RB; Edge SB; Arredondo MA; Blumenson LE; Stewart CC
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 1996; 37(3):229-36. PubMed ID: 8825134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. DNA flow cytometric analysis indicates that many breast cancers detected in the first round of mammographic screening have a low malignant potential.
Kallioniemi OP; Kärkkäinen A; Auvinen O; Mattila J; Koivula T; Hakama M
Int J Cancer; 1988 Nov; 42(5):697-702. PubMed ID: 3182106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Assay of DNA content and estrogen receptor status in human breast cancer].
Chen GJ; Shao YF; Shan Y
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi; 1994 Nov; 16(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 7720507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Experience with breast biopsies using the Advanced Breast Biopsy Instrumentation system.
Leibman AJ; Frager D; Choi P
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 May; 172(5):1409-12. PubMed ID: 10227527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The histopathology of non-palpable breast lesions detected by clinical mammography.
Skjørten FJ; Skaane P; Jacobsen U; Kaaresen R; Haaheim LL
Eur J Surg Oncol; 1990 Dec; 16(6):475-80. PubMed ID: 2253791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Radial scar of the breast: radiologic-pathologic correlation in 22 cases.
Alleva DQ; Smetherman DH; Farr GH; Cederbom GJ
Radiographics; 1999 Oct; 19 Spec No():S27-35; discussion S36-7. PubMed ID: 10517441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Flow cytometric and histomorphometric analysis of limitations of clinical breast cytomorphometry.
Beerman H; Veldhuizen RW; Hermans J; Bonsing BA; Ooms EC
Anal Cell Pathol; 1991 Sep; 3(5):287-97. PubMed ID: 1931754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A prospective comparison of stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration versus stereotaxic core needle biopsy for the diagnosis of mammographic abnormalities.
Symmans WF; Weg N; Gross J; Cangiarella JF; Tata M; Mazzo JA; Waisman J
Cancer; 1999 Mar; 85(5):1119-32. PubMed ID: 10091797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Mammographically detected breast lesions: clinical importance of cytologic atypia in stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples.
Mitnick JS; Vazquez MF; Feiner HD; Pressman P; Roses DF
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):319-22. PubMed ID: 8596824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Mammographic-histopathologic correlation of large-core needle biopsies of the breast.
Ioffe OB; Berg WA; Silverberg SG; Kumar D
Mod Pathol; 1998 Aug; 11(8):721-7. PubMed ID: 9720499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. [Fine needle biopsy of sub-clinical breast lesions under ultrasonographic control].
Tournegros JM; Mouriquand J
J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1994; 23(1):8-12. PubMed ID: 8157897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Flow cytometrically determined DNA content of breast carcinoma and benign lesions: correlations with histopathological parameters.
Uccelli R; Calugi A; Forte D; Mauro F; Polonio-Balbi P; Vecchione A; Vizzone A; De Vita R
Tumori; 1986 Apr; 72(2):171-7. PubMed ID: 3705190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Pathological-radiological correlations in benign lesions excised during a breast screening programme.
Spencer NJ; Evans AJ; Galea M; Sibbering DM; Yeoman LJ; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Blamey RW; Robertson JF
Clin Radiol; 1994 Dec; 49(12):853-6. PubMed ID: 7828391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiographically guided fine-needle aspiration of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Helvie MA; Baker DE; Adler DD; Andersson I; Naylor B; Buckwalter KA
Radiology; 1990 Mar; 174(3 Pt 1):657-61. PubMed ID: 2305045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Atypical hyperplasia: frequency and mammographic and pathologic relationships in excisional biopsies guided with mammography and clinical examination.
Stomper PC; Cholewinski SP; Penetrante RB; Harlos JP; Tsangaris TN
Radiology; 1993 Dec; 189(3):667-71. PubMed ID: 8234688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Follow-up of breast lesions diagnosed as benign with stereotactic core-needle biopsy: frequency of mammographic change and false-negative rate.
Lee CH; Philpotts LE; Horvath LJ; Tocino I
Radiology; 1999 Jul; 212(1):189-94. PubMed ID: 10405741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Flow cytometric S-phase fraction as a complementary biological parameter for the cytological grading of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.
Pinto AE; Cabeçadas J; Nóbrega SD; Mendonça E
Diagn Cytopathol; 2003 Oct; 29(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 14506670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Wire-guided biopsies of nonpalpable breast lesions.
Ahovuo J; Kinnunen J; von Smitten K; Edgren J
Ann Chir Gynaecol; 1990; 79(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 2386362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
