BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9627413)

  • 1. Effect of same- and different-modality spatial cues on auditory and visual target identification.
    Mondor TA; Amirault KJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):745-55. PubMed ID: 9627413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Different visual and auditory latencies affect cross-modal non-spatial repetition inhibition.
    Wu X; Wang A; Tang X; Zhang M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Sep; 200():102940. PubMed ID: 31665621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Intra- and cross-modal cuing of spatial attention: Time courses and mechanisms.
    Lu ZL; Tse HC; Dosher BA; Lesmes LA; Posner C; Chu W
    Vision Res; 2009 Jun; 49(10):1081-96. PubMed ID: 18577394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-modal interactions in time and space: auditory influence on visual attention in hemispatial neglect.
    Van Vleet TM; Robertson LC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 18(8):1368-79. PubMed ID: 16859421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cross-modal cueing in audiovisual spatial attention.
    Blurton SP; Greenlee MW; Gondan M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Oct; 77(7):2356-76. PubMed ID: 26001381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parietal lobe mechanisms of spatial attention: modality-specific or supramodal?
    Farah MJ; Wong AB; Monheit MA; Morrow LA
    Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(4):461-70. PubMed ID: 2733819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.
    Schmitt M; Postma A; De Haan E
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2000 Feb; 53(1):105-30. PubMed ID: 10718066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interaction between endogenous and exogenous orienting in crossmodal attention.
    Chen X; Chen Q; Gao D; Yue Z
    Scand J Psychol; 2012 Aug; 53(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 22670628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.
    Turatto M; Galfano G; Bridgeman B; Umiltà C
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Apr; 155(3):301-10. PubMed ID: 14658019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.
    Yang Z; Mayer AR
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2014 Mar; 35(3):964-74. PubMed ID: 23288620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How automatic are audiovisual links in exogenous spatial attention?
    Mazza V; Turatto M; Rossi M; Umiltà C
    Neuropsychologia; 2007 Feb; 45(3):514-22. PubMed ID: 16581094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The modality shift effect and the effectiveness of warning signals in different modalities.
    Rodway P
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Oct; 120(2):199-226. PubMed ID: 15993828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual unimodal grouping mediates auditory attentional bias in visuo-spatial working memory.
    Botta F; Lupiáñez J; Sanabria D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2013 Sep; 144(1):104-11. PubMed ID: 23792666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bimodal-divided attention attenuates visually induced inhibition of return with audiovisual targets.
    Tang X; Gao Y; Yang W; Ren Y; Wu J; Zhang M; Wu Q
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Apr; 237(4):1093-1107. PubMed ID: 30770958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Reward interacts with modality shift to reduce cross-modal conflict.
    Kang G; Wang L; Zhou X
    J Vis; 2017 Jan; 17(1):19. PubMed ID: 28114493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Switching attention between modalities: further evidence for visual dominance.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2010 May; 74(3):255-67. PubMed ID: 19517132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing the influence of sound parameters on crossmodal cuing in different regions of space.
    Lee J; Spence C
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Apr; 185():96-103. PubMed ID: 29438877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The role of preparation and cue-modality in crossmodal task switching.
    Lukas S; Philipp AM; Koch I
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jul; 134(3):318-22. PubMed ID: 20398881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. When cross-modal spatial attention fails.
    Prime DJ; McDonald JJ; Green J; Ward LM
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Sep; 62(3):192-7. PubMed ID: 18778148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Modulation of auditory spatial attention by visual emotional cues: differential effects of attentional engagement and disengagement for pleasant and unpleasant cues.
    Harrison NR; Woodhouse R
    Cogn Process; 2016 May; 17(2):205-11. PubMed ID: 26842012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.