These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

414 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9627419)

  • 1. On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions.
    Tucker M; Ellis R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):830-46. PubMed ID: 9627419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Do silhouettes and photographs produce fundamentally different object-based correspondence effects?
    Proctor RW; Lien MC; Thompson L
    Cognition; 2017 Dec; 169():91-101. PubMed ID: 28865287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sidestepping spatial confounds in object-based correspondence effects: The Bimanual Affordance Task (BMAT).
    Azaad S; Laham SM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Nov; 72(11):2605-2613. PubMed ID: 31066635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reversing the affordance effect: negative stimulus-response compatibility observed with images of graspable objects.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Cogn Process; 2015 Sep; 16 Suppl 1():287-91. PubMed ID: 26233530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motor inhibition associated with the affordance of briefly displayed objects.
    Vainio L; Hammaren L; Hausen M; Rekolainen E; Riskila S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Jun; 64(6):1094-110. PubMed ID: 21279867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Critical bottom-up attentional factors in the handle orientation effect: asymmetric luminance transients and object-center eccentricity relative to fixation.
    Kostov K; Janyan A
    Psychol Res; 2021 Jun; 85(4):1685-1705. PubMed ID: 32248290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Is that graspable? Let your right hand be the judge.
    Netelenbos N; Gonzalez CL
    Brain Cogn; 2015 Feb; 93():18-25. PubMed ID: 25483823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do already grasped objects activate motor affordances?
    Iani C; Ferraro L; Maiorana NV; Gallese V; Rubichi S
    Psychol Res; 2019 Oct; 83(7):1363-1374. PubMed ID: 29627857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Features of planned hand actions influence identification of graspable objects.
    Bub DN; Masson ME; Lin T
    Psychol Sci; 2013 Jul; 24(7):1269-76. PubMed ID: 23696201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. When does the visual system use viewpoint-invariant representations during recognition?
    Wilson KD; Farah MJ
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2003 May; 16(3):399-415. PubMed ID: 12706220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spatial compatibility effects with unimanual and bimanual wheel-rotation responses: an homage to guiard (1983).
    Murchison NM; Proctor RW
    J Mot Behav; 2013; 45(5):441-54. PubMed ID: 23972054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The different effects of breaking an object at different time points.
    Zou M; Hu S; Hai M; Li Y; Wang Y
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2023 Jun; 30(3):942-952. PubMed ID: 36403168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Attentional processes link perception and action.
    Anderson SJ; Yamagishi N; Karavia V
    Proc Biol Sci; 2002 Jun; 269(1497):1225-32. PubMed ID: 12065038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Objects automatically potentiate action: an fMRI study of implicit processing.
    Grèzes J; Tucker M; Armony J; Ellis R; Passingham RE
    Eur J Neurosci; 2003 Jun; 17(12):2735-40. PubMed ID: 12823480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual object representations can be formed outside the focus of voluntary attention: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Müller D; Winkler I; Roeber U; Schaffer S; Czigler I; Schröger E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Jun; 22(6):1179-88. PubMed ID: 19445610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Intentions and actions.
    Masson MEJ
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2018 Dec; 72(4):219-228. PubMed ID: 30475005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Graspable objects grab attention when the potential for action is recognized.
    Handy TC; Grafton ST; Shroff NM; Ketay S; Gazzaniga MS
    Nat Neurosci; 2003 Apr; 6(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 12640459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic Recruitment of the Motor System by Undetected Graspable Objects: A Motor-evoked Potential Study.
    McNair NA; Behrens AD; Harris IM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1918-1931. PubMed ID: 28686138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Goal congruency without stimulus congruency in bimanual coordination.
    Kunde W; Krauss H; Weigelt M
    Psychol Res; 2009 Jan; 73(1):34-42. PubMed ID: 18320217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The potentiation of two components of the reach-to-grasp action during object categorisation in visual memory.
    Derbyshire N; Ellis R; Tucker M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 May; 122(1):74-98. PubMed ID: 16376844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.