These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9627425)

  • 1. Effects of stimulus duration and intensity on simple reaction time and response force.
    Ulrich R; Rinkenauer G; Miller J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Jun; 24(3):915-28. PubMed ID: 9627425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Response force is sensitive to the temporal uncertainty of response stimuli.
    Mattes S; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1997 Oct; 59(7):1089-97. PubMed ID: 9360481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of auditory stimulus intensity on response force in simple, go/no-go, and choice RT tasks.
    Miller J; Franz V; Ulrich R
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Jan; 61(1):107-19. PubMed ID: 10070203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effect of stimulus intensity on force output in simple reaction time task in humans.
    Jaśkowski P; Rybarczyk K; Jaroszyk F; Lemański D
    Acta Neurobiol Exp (Wars); 1995; 55(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 7597929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Time course of auditory masker effects: tapping the locus of audiovisual integration?
    Steenken R; Diederich A; Colonius H
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Apr; 435(1):78-83. PubMed ID: 18355963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of acoustic startle stimuli on interceptive action.
    Tresilian JR; Plooy AM
    Neuroscience; 2006 Oct; 142(2):579-94. PubMed ID: 16904270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Does immediate arousal enhance response force in simple reaction time?
    Ulrich R; Mattes S
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1996 Nov; 49(4):972-90. PubMed ID: 8962543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Motor processes in simple, go/no-go, and choice reaction time tasks: a psychophysiological analysis.
    Miller JO; Low K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2001 Apr; 27(2):266-89. PubMed ID: 11318047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The facilitation of motor actions by acoustic and electric stimulation.
    Marinovic W; Milford M; Carroll T; Riek S
    Psychophysiology; 2015 Dec; 52(12):1698-710. PubMed ID: 26338375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anticipatory postural adjustments during step initiation: elicitation by auditory stimulation of differing intensities.
    Delval A; Dujardin K; Tard C; Devanne H; Willart S; Bourriez JL; Derambure P; Defebvre L
    Neuroscience; 2012 Sep; 219():166-74. PubMed ID: 22626643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Startle reveals decreased response preparatory activation during a stop-signal task.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2016 Sep; 116(3):986-94. PubMed ID: 27281747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Reaction time effects due to imperative stimulus modality are absent when a startle elicits a pre-programmed action.
    Carlsen AN; Lam MY; Maslovat D; Chua R
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 Aug; 500(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 21723371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of response readiness on reaction time and force output in people with Parkinson's disease.
    Franz EA; Miller J
    Brain; 2002 Aug; 125(Pt 8):1733-50. PubMed ID: 12135965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of inter-stimulus interval (ISI) duration on the N1 and P2 components of the auditory event-related potential.
    Pereira DR; Cardoso S; Ferreira-Santos F; Fernandes C; Cunha-Reis C; Paiva TO; Almeida PR; Silveira C; Barbosa F; Marques-Teixeira J
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2014 Dec; 94(3):311-8. PubMed ID: 25304172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Startle reveals an absence of advance motor programming in a Go/No-go task.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Dakin CJ; Sanderson DJ; Inglis JT; Franks IM
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 434(1):61-5. PubMed ID: 18262355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dopamine neurons of the monkey midbrain: contingencies of responses to stimuli eliciting immediate behavioral reactions.
    Schultz W; Romo R
    J Neurophysiol; 1990 Mar; 63(3):607-24. PubMed ID: 2329364
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Go-activation endures following the presentation of a stop-signal: evidence from startle.
    Drummond NM; Cressman EK; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Jan; 117(1):403-411. PubMed ID: 27832599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Combined effects of motor response, sensory modality, and stimulus intensity on temporal reproduction.
    Indraccolo A; Spence C; Vatakis A; Harrar V
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 May; 234(5):1189-98. PubMed ID: 25869739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance.
    Laurienti PJ; Kraft RA; Maldjian JA; Burdette JH; Wallace MT
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(4):405-14. PubMed ID: 15221173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Responses to loud auditory stimuli indicate that movement-related activation builds up in anticipation of action.
    Marinovic W; de Rugy A; Lipp OV; Tresilian JR
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Feb; 109(4):996-1008. PubMed ID: 23175800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.