These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 96280)
1. Should prematiral syphilis serologies continue to be mandated by law? Felman YM JAMA; 1978 Aug; 240(5):459-60. PubMed ID: 96280 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Repeal of mandated premarital tests for syphilis: a survey of state health officers. Felman YM Am J Public Health; 1981 Feb; 71(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 6779649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Premarital syphilis screening: weighing the benefits. Kingon RJ; Wiesner PJ Am J Public Health; 1981 Feb; 71(2):160-2. PubMed ID: 6779650 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Public health notes: premarital syphilis testing. Blankenbaker RG J Indiana State Med Assoc; 1982 Feb; 75(2):135, 144. PubMed ID: 7069202 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Laws mandating premarital serologic tests for syphilis should be repealed. Felman YM Arch Dermatol; 1982 Mar; 118(3):145-6. PubMed ID: 7065659 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. THE PREMARITAL LAW. HISTORY AND A SURVEY OF ITS EFFECTIVENESS IN MICHIGAN. TRYTHALL SW JAMA; 1964 Mar; 187():900-3. PubMed ID: 14100143 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Public health report. Calif Med; 1971 Oct; 115(4):78-9. PubMed ID: 5110600 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Premarital blood tests: mass screening for the wrong population. Hastings Cent Rep; 1978 Dec; 8(6):2. PubMed ID: 728245 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Rapid tests for maternal syphilis screening: effective and cost-effective. Stoner BP Sex Transm Dis; 2008 Sep; 35(9):785-6. PubMed ID: 18665015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. ARE PREMARITAL EXAMINATION LAWS EFFECTIVE? PORTER WL Del Med J; 1964 Sep; 36():199 PASSIM. PubMed ID: 14178060 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. The serologic syphilis test required for marriage in other states. Cavenaugh RL Md State Med J; 1969 May; 18(5):33. PubMed ID: 5787898 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-benefit analysis of a prenatal preventive programme against congenital syphilis. Stray-Pedersen B NIPH Ann; 1980 May; 3(1):57-66. PubMed ID: 6779243 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Serologic testing for syphilis in the United States: a cost-effectiveness analysis of two screening algorithms. Owusu-Edusei K; Peterman TA; Ballard RC Sex Transm Dis; 2011 Jan; 38(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 20739911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Unnecessary tests for syphilis on donated blood. Westphal R N Engl J Med; 1984 May; 310(18):1194. PubMed ID: 6424017 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening for syphilis in pregnancy: which is the proper method? Wiwanitkit V Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Dec; 276(6):629-31. PubMed ID: 17569069 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A cost-benefit analysis of California's mandatory premarital screening program for syphilis. Haskell RJ West J Med; 1984 Oct; 141(4):538-41. PubMed ID: 6438916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]