These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9628412)

  • 1. The role of head movements in the control of manual prehension.
    Marotta JJ; Kruyer A; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 May; 120(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 9628412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of learned pictorial cues in the programming and control of grasping.
    Marotta JJ; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Aug; 121(4):465-70. PubMed ID: 9746154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. When two eyes are better than one in prehension: monocular viewing and end-point variance.
    Loftus A; Servos P; Goodale MA; Mendarozqueta N; Mon-Williams M
    Exp Brain Res; 2004 Oct; 158(3):317-27. PubMed ID: 15164152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The removal of binocular cues disrupts the calibration of grasping in patients with visual form agnosia.
    Marotta JJ; Behrmann M; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1997 Aug; 116(1):113-21. PubMed ID: 9305820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Motion parallax enables depth processing for action in a visual form agnosic when binocular vision is unavailable.
    Dijkerman HC; Milner AD; Carey DP
    Neuropsychologia; 1999 Dec; 37(13):1505-10. PubMed ID: 10617271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some binocular advantages for planning reach, but not grasp, components of prehension.
    Grant S; Conway ML
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 May; 237(5):1239-1255. PubMed ID: 30850853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Advantages of binocular vision for the control of reaching and grasping.
    Melmoth DR; Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 May; 171(3):371-88. PubMed ID: 16323004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Monocular vision leads to a dissociation between grip force and grip aperture scaling during reach-to-grasp movements.
    Jackson SR; Newport R; Shaw A
    Curr Biol; 2002 Feb; 12(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 11839278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adapting to monocular vision: grasping with one eye.
    Marotta JJ; Perrot TS; Nicolle D; Servos P; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1995; 104(1):107-14. PubMed ID: 7621928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Monocular Spatial Cues on Vergence Eye Movements in Monocular and Binocular Viewing of 3-D and 2-D Stimuli.
    Batvinionak AA; Gracheva MA; Bolshakov AS; Rozhkova GI
    Perception; 2015; 44(8-9):1077-84. PubMed ID: 26562921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The role of binocular vision in prehension: a kinematic analysis.
    Servos P; Goodale MA; Jakobson LS
    Vision Res; 1992 Aug; 32(8):1513-21. PubMed ID: 1455724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monocular and binocular control of human interceptive movements.
    Servos P; Goodale MA
    Exp Brain Res; 1998 Mar; 119(1):92-102. PubMed ID: 9521540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A comparison of visuomotor cue integration strategies for object placement and prehension.
    Greenwald HS; Knill DC
    Vis Neurosci; 2009; 26(1):63-72. PubMed ID: 18759994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Binocular cues are important in controlling the grasp but not the reach in natural prehension movements.
    Watt SJ; Bradshaw MF
    Neuropsychologia; 2000; 38(11):1473-81. PubMed ID: 10906373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distance estimation in the visual and visuomotor systems.
    Servos P
    Exp Brain Res; 2000 Jan; 130(1):35-47. PubMed ID: 10638439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Binocular information in the control of prehensile movements in multiple-object scenes.
    Watt SJ; Bradshaw MF
    Spat Vis; 2002; 15(2):141-55. PubMed ID: 11991571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Grasping deficits and adaptations in adults with stereo vision losses.
    Melmoth DR; Finlay AL; Morgan MJ; Grant S
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2009 Aug; 50(8):3711-20. PubMed ID: 19339741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of intermittent vision on prehension under binocular and monocular viewing.
    Bennett SJ; Elliott D; Weeks DJ; Keil D
    Motor Control; 2003 Jan; 7(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 12536161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gaze-grasp coordination in obstacle avoidance: differences between binocular and monocular viewing.
    Grant S
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Dec; 233(12):3489-505. PubMed ID: 26298046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Binocular cues and the control of prehension.
    Bradshaw MF; Elliott KM; Watt SJ; Hibbard PB; Davies IR; Simpson PJ
    Spat Vis; 2004; 17(1-2):95-110. PubMed ID: 15078014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.