These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9629064)

  • 1. Effect of semi-rigid lumbosacral orthosis use on oxygen consumption during repetitive stoop and squat lifting.
    Duplessis DH; Greenway EH; Keene KL; Lee IE; Clayton RL; Metzler T; Underwood FB
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):790-7. PubMed ID: 9629064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ratings of perceived thigh and back exertion in forest workers during repetitive lifting using squat and stoop techniques.
    Hagen KB; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1994 Nov; 19(22):2511-7. PubMed ID: 7855674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficiency and effectiveness of stoop and squat lifting at different frequencies.
    Welbergen E; Kemper HC; Knibbe JJ; Toussaint HM; Clysen L
    Ergonomics; 1991 May; 34(5):613-24. PubMed ID: 1884712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of squat and stoop dynamic liftings: muscle forces and internal spinal loads.
    Bazrgari B; Shirazi-Adl A; Arjmand N
    Eur Spine J; 2007 May; 16(5):687-99. PubMed ID: 17103232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.
    Abdoli-E M; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):456-65. PubMed ID: 16494978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Three-dimensional motion analysis of the lumbar spine during "free squat" weight lift training.
    Walsh JC; Quinlan JF; Stapleton R; FitzPatrick DP; McCormack D
    Am J Sports Med; 2007 Jun; 35(6):927-32. PubMed ID: 17307893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Physiological and subjective responses to maximal repetitive lifting employing stoop and squat technique.
    Hagen KB; Hallén J; Harms-Ringdahl K
    Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol; 1993; 67(4):291-7. PubMed ID: 8299594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of lumbar belts on isolated lumbar muscle. Strength and dynamic capacity.
    Reyna JR; Leggett SH; Kenney K; Holmes B; Mooney V
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Jan; 20(1):68-73. PubMed ID: 7709282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of squat lift training and free weight muscle training on maximum lifting load and isolinetic peak torque of young adults without impairments.
    Yeung SS; Ng GY
    Phys Ther; 2000 Jun; 80(6):570-7. PubMed ID: 10842410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Maximum acceptable repetitive lifting workload by Chinese subjects.
    Zhu ZX; Zhang ZJ
    Ergonomics; 1990 Jul; 33(7):875-84. PubMed ID: 2226423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of back belt use on isometric lifting force and fatigue of the lumbar paraspinal muscles.
    Majkowski GR; Jovag BW; Taylor BT; Taylor MS; Allison SC; Stetts DM; Clayton RL
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1998 Oct; 23(19):2104-9. PubMed ID: 9794055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of instruction, surface stability, and load intensity on trunk muscle activity.
    Bressel E; Willardson JM; Thompson B; Fontana FE
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e500-4. PubMed ID: 19054687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How to lift a box that is too large to fit between the knees.
    Kingma I; Faber GS; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2010 Oct; 53(10):1228-38. PubMed ID: 20865606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effectiveness of weight-belts during multiple repetitions of the squat exercise.
    Lander JE; Hundley JR; Simonton RL
    Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1992 May; 24(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 1533266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of asymmetric dynamic and isometric liftings on strength/force and rating of perceived exertion.
    Hattori Y; Ono Y; Shimaoka M; Hiruta S; Kamijima M; Shibata E; Ichihara G; Ando S; Villaneuva MB; Takeuchi Y
    Ergonomics; 1996 Jun; 39(6):862-76. PubMed ID: 8681928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physiological limits in lifting.
    Khalil TM; Genaidy AM; Asfour SS; Vinciguerra T
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1985 Apr; 46(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 4003273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of loading on unintentional lifting velocity declines during single sets of repetitions to failure during upper and lower extremity muscle actions.
    Izquierdo M; González-Badillo JJ; Häkkinen K; Ibáñez J; Kraemer WJ; Altadill A; Eslava J; Gorostiaga EM
    Int J Sports Med; 2006 Sep; 27(9):718-24. PubMed ID: 16944400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effect of an abdominal belt on trunk muscle activity and intra-abdominal pressure during squat lifts.
    McGill SM; Norman RW; Sharratt MT
    Ergonomics; 1990 Feb; 33(2):147-60. PubMed ID: 2141312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.