These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9629065)

  • 1. Method and performance: two elements of work technique.
    Kjellberg K; Lindbeck L; Hagberg M
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):798-816. PubMed ID: 9629065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G; Mirka G
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Muscle fatigue and fatigue-related biomechanical changes during a cyclic lifting task.
    Bonato P; Ebenbichler GR; Roy SH; Lehr S; Posch M; Kollmitzer J; Della Croce U
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1810-20. PubMed ID: 12923468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Changes in the surface EMG signal and the biomechanics of motion during a repetitive lifting task.
    Bonato P; Boissy P; Della Croce U; Roy SH
    IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2002 Mar; 10(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 12173738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An on-body personal lift augmentation device (PLAD) reduces EMG amplitude of erector spinae during lifting tasks.
    Abdoli-E M; Agnew MJ; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 Jun; 21(5):456-65. PubMed ID: 16494978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of trunk muscle forces and spinal loads estimated by two biomechanical models.
    Arjmand N; Gagnon D; Plamondon A; Shirazi-Adl A; Larivière C
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Aug; 24(7):533-41. PubMed ID: 19493597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electromyographic assessment of trunk muscle activation amplitudes during a simulated lifting task using pattern recognition techniques.
    Butler HL; Hubley-Kozey CL; Kozey JW
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Dec; 19(6):e505-12. PubMed ID: 19041264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can low back loading during lifting be reduced by placing one leg beside the object to be lifted?
    Kingma I; Faber GS; Bakker AJ; van Dieën JH
    Phys Ther; 2006 Aug; 86(8):1091-105. PubMed ID: 16879043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Significance of biomechanical and physiological variables during the determination of maximum acceptable weight of lift.
    Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Lewis KE; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1999 Sep; 42(9):1216-32. PubMed ID: 10503055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysically acceptable weights for a combination lifting task using bags with handles.
    Fredericks TK; Fernandez JE; Rodrigues CC
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 1994 Dec; 23(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 7730595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Capability and recruitment patterns of trunk during isometric uniaxial and biaxial upright exertion.
    Sheikhzadeh A; Parnianpour M; Nordin M
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jun; 23(5):527-35. PubMed ID: 18207293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A biomechanical analysis of anterior load carriage.
    Anderson AM; Meador KA; McClure LR; Makrozahopoulos D; Brooks DJ; Mirka GA
    Ergonomics; 2007 Dec; 50(12):2104-17. PubMed ID: 17852376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effect of on-body lift assistive device on the lumbar 3D dynamic moments and EMG during asymmetric freestyle lifting.
    Abdoli-E M; Stevenson JM
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Mar; 23(3):372-80. PubMed ID: 18093709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Dynamic versus static analyses of lifting a box from the floor.
    Menzer HM; Reiser RF
    Biomed Sci Instrum; 2005; 41():305-10. PubMed ID: 15850123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Determination of the effect of lift characteristics on dynamic performance profiles during manual materials handling tasks.
    Khalaf KA; Parnianpour M; Sparto PJ; Barin K
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):126-45. PubMed ID: 9973876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.