BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9631167)

  • 1. Estimating the accuracy of screening mammography: a meta-analysis.
    Mushlin AI; Kouides RW; Shapiro DE
    Am J Prev Med; 1998 Feb; 14(2):143-53. PubMed ID: 9631167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-aided detection mammography for breast cancer screening: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Noble M; Bruening W; Uhl S; Schoelles K
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jun; 279(6):881-90. PubMed ID: 19023581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The added value of mammography in different age-groups of women with and without BRCA mutation screened with breast MRI.
    Vreemann S; van Zelst JCM; Schlooz-Vries M; Bult P; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Gubern-Mérida A; Mann RM
    Breast Cancer Res; 2018 Aug; 20(1):84. PubMed ID: 30075794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the Dutch performance indicators.
    Otten JD; Karssemeijer N; Hendriks JH; Groenewoud JH; Fracheboud J; Verbeek AL; de Koning HJ; Holland R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2005 May; 97(10):748-54. PubMed ID: 15900044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Efficacy of screening mammography. A meta-analysis.
    Kerlikowske K; Grady D; Rubin SM; Sandrock C; Ernster VL
    JAMA; 1995 Jan; 273(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 7799496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of human variability on independent double reading in screening mammography.
    Beam CA; Sullivan DC; Layde PM
    Acad Radiol; 1996 Nov; 3(11):891-7. PubMed ID: 8959178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving the accuracy of mammography: volume and outcome relationships.
    Esserman L; Cowley H; Eberle C; Kirkpatrick A; Chang S; Berbaum K; Gale A
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2002 Mar; 94(5):369-75. PubMed ID: 11880475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of mammography in breast cancer prevention.
    Whitman GJ
    Curr Opin Oncol; 1999 Sep; 11(5):414-8. PubMed ID: 10505782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of Risk Category and Screening Round on the Performance of an MR Imaging and Mammography Screening Program in Carriers of the BRCA Mutation and Other Women at Increased Risk.
    Vreemann S; Gubern-Mérida A; Schlooz-Vries MS; Bult P; van Gils CH; Hoogerbrugge N; Karssemeijer N; Mann RM
    Radiology; 2018 Feb; 286(2):443-451. PubMed ID: 29040037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Breast cancer screening: a summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force.
    Humphrey LL; Helfand M; Chan BK; Woolf SH
    Ann Intern Med; 2002 Sep; 137(5 Part 1):347-60. PubMed ID: 12204020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Interval breast cancers in the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia: analysis and classification.
    Burhenne HJ; Burhenne LW; Goldberg F; Hislop TG; Worth AJ; Rebbeck PM; Kan L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 May; 162(5):1067-71; discussion 1072-5. PubMed ID: 8165983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The accuracy of mammography screening for breast cancer: a Meta-analysis].
    Zhu C; Wang L; Du LB; Li J; Zhang J; Dai M; Shi JF
    Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Sep; 37(9):1296-1305. PubMed ID: 27655581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of estrogen replacement therapy on the specificity and sensitivity of screening mammography.
    Laya MB; Larson EB; Taplin SH; White E
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 1996 May; 88(10):643-9. PubMed ID: 8627640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Neglected aspects of false positive findings of mammography in breast cancer screening: analysis of false positive cases from the Stockholm trial.
    Lidbrink E; Elfving J; Frisell J; Jonsson E
    BMJ; 1996 Feb; 312(7026):273-6. PubMed ID: 8611781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. National Performance Benchmarks for Modern Screening Digital Mammography: Update from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium.
    Lehman CD; Arao RF; Sprague BL; Lee JM; Buist DS; Kerlikowske K; Henderson LM; Onega T; Tosteson AN; Rauscher GH; Miglioretti DL
    Radiology; 2017 Apr; 283(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 27918707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis to Update the 2009 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.
    Nelson HD; Fu R; Cantor A; Pappas M; Daeges M; Humphrey L
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Feb; 164(4):244-55. PubMed ID: 26756588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.