These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9631332)

  • 1. Hearing aid electromagnetic interference from digital wireless telephones.
    Skopec M
    IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng; 1998 Jun; 6(2):235-9. PubMed ID: 9631332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Difference between the default telecoil (t-coil) and programmed microphone frequency response in behind-the-ear (BTE) hearing aids.
    Putterman DB; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 May; 23(5):366-78. PubMed ID: 22533979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of CDMA wireless phone power output and puncture rate on hearing aid interference levels.
    Fry TL; Schlegel RE; Grant H
    Biomed Instrum Technol; 2000; 34(1):29-38. PubMed ID: 10690434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Australian experience: global system for mobile communications wireless telephones and hearing aids.
    Byrne D; Burwood E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):315-21. PubMed ID: 11440320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of microphone location in ITE versus BTE hearing aids.
    Gartrell EL; Church GT
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1990 Jul; 1(3):151-3. PubMed ID: 2132598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Field measurements of electromagnetic interference in hearing aids.
    Levitt H; Harkins J; Singer B; Yeung E
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):275-80. PubMed ID: 11440312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Wireless telephone-hearing aid electromagnetic compatibility research at the University of Oklahoma.
    Schlegel RE; Ravindran AR; Raman S; Grant H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):301-8. PubMed ID: 11440318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electromagnetic interference of bone-anchored hearing aids by cellular phones.
    Kompis M; Negri S; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Oct; 120(7):855-9. PubMed ID: 11132720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying the bystander-effect of 2.5G mobile telephones on the speech perception of digital hearing aid users.
    Vlastarakos PV; Nikolopoulos TP; Manolopoulos L; Stamou A; Halkiotis KK; Ferekidis E; Georgiou E
    B-ENT; 2012; 8(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 22896928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital cellular telephone interaction with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators.
    Fetter JG; Ivans V; Benditt DG; Collins J
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1998 Mar; 31(3):623-8. PubMed ID: 9502645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An evaluation of digital cellular handsets by hearing aid users.
    Kozma-Spytek L; Harkins J
    J Rehabil Res Dev; 2005; 42(4 Suppl 2):145-56. PubMed ID: 16470470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Wireless telephones and hearing aids: an overview.
    Ross M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):286-9. PubMed ID: 11440314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Electromagnetic interference of bone-anchored hearing aids by cellular phones revisited.
    Kompis M; Häusler R
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2002 Jul; 122(5):510-2. PubMed ID: 12206260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The European experience.
    Bisgaard N
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):296-300. PubMed ID: 11440316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital signal processing hearing aids, personal FM systems, and interference: is there a problem?
    Bamford J; Hostler M; Pont G
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15937414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Wind noise at microphones within and across hearing aids at wind speeds below and above microphone saturation.
    Zakis JA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jun; 129(6):3897-907. PubMed ID: 21682412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effect of reference microphone placement on sound pressure levels at an ear level hearing aid microphone.
    Feigin JA; Barlow NL; Stelmachowicz PG
    Ear Hear; 1990 Oct; 11(5):321-6. PubMed ID: 2262080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cellular telephone interference with medical equipment.
    Tri JL; Severson RP; Firl AR; Hayes DL; Abenstein JP
    Mayo Clin Proc; 2005 Oct; 80(10):1286-90. PubMed ID: 16212140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Suitcase lab measurement of digital cellphone interference levels on hearing aids.
    Killion MC; Teder H; Thoma R
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2001 Jun; 12(6):281-5. PubMed ID: 11440313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.