173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9632359)
1. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of nonsteroidal estrogen receptor ligands using the comparative molecular field analysis/cross-validated r2-guided region selection approach.
Sadler BR; Cho SJ; Ishaq KS; Chae K; Korach KS
J Med Chem; 1998 Jun; 41(13):2261-7. PubMed ID: 9632359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of the estrogen specific mitogenic response of MCF-7 cells by selected analogues of estradiol-17 beta: a 3D QSAR study.
Wiese TE; Polin LA; Palomino E; Brooks SC
J Med Chem; 1997 Oct; 40(22):3659-69. PubMed ID: 9357533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. CoMFA-based prediction of agonist affinities at recombinant D1 vs D2 dopamine receptors.
Wilcox RE; Tseng T; Brusniak MY; Ginsburg B; Pearlman RS; Teeter M; DuRand C; Starr S; Neve KA
J Med Chem; 1998 Oct; 41(22):4385-99. PubMed ID: 9784114
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Three-dimensional model of nonsteroidal estrogen receptor ligand binding/electron topological method.
Guzel Y; Sivritas K
Arzneimittelforschung; 2004; 54(6):348-54. PubMed ID: 15281621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of estrogen receptor alpha and beta subtypes based on comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA).
Xing L; Welsh WJ; Tong W; Perkins R; Sheehan DM
SAR QSAR Environ Res; 1999; 10(2-3):215-37. PubMed ID: 10491851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. CoMFA and docking study of novel estrogen receptor subtype selective ligands.
Wolohan P; Reichert DE
J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003; 17(5-6):313-28. PubMed ID: 14635724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 3D-QSAR study of bis-azaaromatic quaternary ammonium analogs at the blood-brain barrier choline transporter.
Geldenhuys WJ; Lockman PR; Nguyen TH; Van der Schyf CJ; Crooks PA; Dwoskin LP; Allen DD
Bioorg Med Chem; 2005 Jul; 13(13):4253-61. PubMed ID: 15878282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Melatonin receptor ligands: synthesis of new melatonin derivatives and comprehensive comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA) study.
Mor M; Rivara S; Silva C; Bordi F; Plazzi PV; Spadoni G; Diamantini G; Balsamini C; Tarzia G; Fraschini F; Lucini V; Nonno R; Stankov BM
J Med Chem; 1998 Sep; 41(20):3831-44. PubMed ID: 9748358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Identification of the structural requirements of the receptor-binding affinity of diphenolic azoles to estrogen receptors alpha and beta by three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship and structure-activity relationship analysis.
Demyttenaere-Kovatcheva A; Cronin MT; Benfenati E; Roncaglioni A; Lopiparo E
J Med Chem; 2005 Dec; 48(24):7628-36. PubMed ID: 16302803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 3D-QSAR analysis of conformationally constrained diacylglycerol (DAG) analogues as potent protein kinase C (PK-C) ligands.
Kim SY; Lee J
Bioorg Med Chem; 2004 May; 12(10):2639-44. PubMed ID: 15110845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. 3D QSAR comparative molecular field analysis on nonsteroidal farnesoid X receptor activators.
Honório KM; Garratt RC; Polikarpov I; Andricopulo AD
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Mar; 25(6):921-7. PubMed ID: 17055759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. QSAR study of a large set of 3-pyridyl ethers as ligands of the alpha4beta2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptor.
Zhang H; Li H; Ma Q
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Jul; 26(1):226-35. PubMed ID: 17208024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative molecular field analysis of hydantoin binding to the neuronal voltage-dependent sodium channel.
Brown ML; Zha CC; Van Dyke CC; Brown GB; Brouillette WJ
J Med Chem; 1999 May; 42(9):1537-45. PubMed ID: 10229624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Antitumor agents. 163. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship study of 4'-O-demethylepipodophyllotoxin analogs using the modified CoMFA/q2-GRS approach.
Cho SJ; Tropsha A; Suffness M; Cheng YC; Lee KH
J Med Chem; 1996 Mar; 39(7):1383-95. PubMed ID: 8691468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural and chemical basis for enhanced affinity and potency for a large series of estrogen receptor ligands: 2D and 3D QSAR studies.
Salum Lde B; Polikarpov I; Andricopulo AD
J Mol Graph Model; 2007 Sep; 26(2):434-42. PubMed ID: 17349808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prediction of ligand binding affinity and orientation of xenoestrogens to the estrogen receptor by molecular dynamics simulations and the linear interaction energy method.
van Lipzig MM; ter Laak AM; Jongejan A; Vermeulen NP; Wamelink M; Geerke D; Meerman JH
J Med Chem; 2004 Feb; 47(4):1018-30. PubMed ID: 14761204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Three-dimensional quantitative structure-activity relationship of melatonin receptor ligands: a comparative molecular field analysis study.
Sicsic S; Serraz I; Andrieux J; Brémont B; Mathé-Allainmat M; Poncet A; Shen S; Langlois M
J Med Chem; 1997 Feb; 40(5):739-48. PubMed ID: 9057860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantitative structure-activity relationship modeling of dopamine D(1) antagonists using comparative molecular field analysis, genetic algorithms-partial least-squares, and K nearest neighbor methods.
Hoffman B; Cho SJ; Zheng W; Wyrick S; Nichols DE; Mailman RB; Tropsha A
J Med Chem; 1999 Aug; 42(17):3217-26. PubMed ID: 10464009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CoMFA and CoMSIA 3D QSAR analysis on N1-arylsulfonylindole compounds as 5-HT6 antagonists.
Doddareddy MR; Cho YS; Koh HY; Pae AN
Bioorg Med Chem; 2004 Aug; 12(15):3977-85. PubMed ID: 15246074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. 3D-QSAR studies of arylpyrazole antagonists of cannabinoid receptor subtypes CB1 and CB2. A combined NMR and CoMFA approach.
Chen JZ; Han XW; Liu Q; Makriyannis A; Wang J; Xie XQ
J Med Chem; 2006 Jan; 49(2):625-36. PubMed ID: 16420048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
