These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9633174)

  • 41. Bond strength of orthodontic brackets using different light and self-curing cements.
    Toledano M; Osorio R; Osorio E; Romeo A; de la Higuera B; García-Godoy F
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Feb; 73(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 12607856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to restorative resin composite surfaces.
    Lai PY; Woods MG; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1999 Apr; 15(4):235-45. PubMed ID: 11933358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mechanical behavior of glass ionomer cements affected by long-term storage in water.
    Cattani-Lorente MA; Godin C; Meyer JM
    Dent Mater; 1994 Jan; 10(1):37-44. PubMed ID: 7995474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Diametral tensile strength and bonding to dentin of type I glass ionomer cements.
    Galun EA; Saleh N; Lewinstein I
    J Prosthet Dent; 1994 Oct; 72(4):424-9. PubMed ID: 7990049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Glass Ionomer Cements can be used for Bonding Orthodontic Brackets After Cancer Radiation Treatment?
    Santin GC; Queiroz AM; Palma-Dibb RG; Oliveira HF; Nelson Filho P; Romano FL
    Braz Dent J; 2018; 29(2):128-132. PubMed ID: 29898057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Bond strength of glass-ionomer cement and composite resin combinations.
    Oilo G; Um CM
    Quintessence Int; 1992 Sep; 23(9):633-9. PubMed ID: 1287716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Glass ionomer cements as luting agents for orthodontic brackets.
    Coups-Smith KS; Rossouw PE; Titley KC
    Angle Orthod; 2003 Aug; 73(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 12940565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Effect of early water contact on solubility of glass ionomer luting cements.
    Gemalmaz D; Yoruc B; Ozcan M; Alkumru HN
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Oct; 80(4):474-8. PubMed ID: 9791796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The repair potential of resin-modified glass-ionomer cements.
    Maneenut C; Sakoolnamarka R; Tyas MJ
    Dent Mater; 2010 Jul; 26(7):659-65. PubMed ID: 20409575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Bonding strength of glass ionomers to dense synthetic hydroxyapatite and fluoroapatite ceramics.
    Li J; Liu Y; Liu Y; Söremark R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 1996 Feb; 54(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 8669236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A comparison between the shear bond strength of brackets bonded to glazed and deglazed porcelain surfaces with resin-reinforced glass-ionomer cement and a bis-GMA resin adhesive.
    Lifshitz AB; Cárdenas M
    World J Orthod; 2006; 7(2):134-7. PubMed ID: 16779971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Effects of enamel deproteinization on bracket bonding with conventional and resin-modified glass ionomer cements.
    Pereira TB; Jansen WC; Pithon MM; Souki BQ; Tanaka OM; Oliveira DD
    Eur J Orthod; 2013 Aug; 35(4):442-6. PubMed ID: 22379131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Antibacterial activity of resin adhesives, glass ionomer and resin-modified glass ionomer cements and a compomer in contact with dentin caries samples.
    Herrera M; Castillo A; Bravo M; Liébana J; Carrión P
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):265-9. PubMed ID: 11203829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Bond strength and interface micromorphology of an improved resin-modified glass ionomer cement.
    Pereira PN; Yamada T; Tei R; Tagami J
    Am J Dent; 1997 Jun; 10(3):128-32. PubMed ID: 9545887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The influence of bracket base design on the strength of the bracket-cement interface.
    Knox J; Hubsch P; Jones ML; Middleton J
    J Orthod; 2000 Sep; 27(3):249-54. PubMed ID: 11099557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. The influence of different bracket base surfaces on tensile and shear bond strength.
    Algera TJ; Kleverlaan CJ; Prahl-Andersen B; Feilzer AJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Oct; 30(5):490-4. PubMed ID: 18684707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. [Changes in the enamel after in vitro debonding of brackets bonded with a modified glass ionomer cement].
    Sorel O; el Alam R; Chagneau F; Cathelineau G
    Orthod Fr; 2000 Apr; 71(2):155-63. PubMed ID: 10916640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a light-cured glass ionomer and a chemically cured glass ionomer for use as an orthodontic bonding agent.
    Compton AM; Meyers CE; Hondrum SO; Lorton L
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Feb; 101(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 1739068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Comparison of the shear bond strength of a so-called 'dual-cured glass-ionomer cement' and a conventional resin composite used in orthodontic bonding.
    Phijaisanit P; Tyas MJ
    Aust Orthod J; 1997 Oct; 15(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 9528399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Evaluation of shear bond strength of silorane resin to conventional, resin-modified glass ionomers and nano-ionomer cements.
    Babannavar R; Shenoy A
    J Investig Clin Dent; 2014 Nov; 5(4):295-300. PubMed ID: 23355365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.