256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9633202)
1. [Study of the efficiency of a non-mydriatic retinal camera in the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy].
Hernáez-Ortega MC; Soto-Pedre E; Vázquez JA; Gutiérrez MA; Asua J
Rev Clin Esp; 1998 Apr; 198(4):194-9. PubMed ID: 9633202
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy: comparison of fundus photography with automated color contrast threshold test.
Ong GL; Ripley LG; Newsom RS; Cooper M; Casswell AG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Mar; 137(3):445-52. PubMed ID: 15013866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Screening for diabetic retinopathy by one-field, non-mydriatic, 45 degrees digital photography is inadequate.
Kuo HK; Hsieh HH; Liu RT
Ophthalmologica; 2005; 219(5):292-6. PubMed ID: 16123556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal imaging for screening diabetic retinopathy.
Lopez-Bastida J; Cabrera-Lopez F; Serrano-Aguilar P
Diabet Med; 2007 Apr; 24(4):403-7. PubMed ID: 17298591
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Digital fundus image grading with the non-mydriatic Visucam(PRO NM) versus the FF450(plus) camera in diabetic retinopathy.
Neubauer AS; Rothschuh A; Ulbig MW; Blum M
Acta Ophthalmol; 2008 Mar; 86(2):177-82. PubMed ID: 17944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Telemedicine-based digital retinal imaging vs standard ophthalmologic evaluation for the assessment of diabetic retinopathy.
Li Z; Wu C; Olayiwola JN; Hilaire DS; Huang JJ
Conn Med; 2012 Feb; 76(2):85-90. PubMed ID: 22670358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Screening for sight threatening diabetic retinopathy using non-mydriatic retinal camera in a primary care setting: to dilate or not to dilate?
Baeza M; Orozco-Beltrán D; Gil-Guillen VF; Pedrera V; Ribera MC; Pertusa S; Merino J
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 Mar; 63(3):433-8. PubMed ID: 19222628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Screening for diabetic retinopathy in a clinical setting: a comparison of direct ophthalmoscopy by primary care physicians with fundus photography.
Griffith SP; Freeman WL; Shaw CJ; Mitchell WH; Olden CR; Figgs LD; Kinyoun JL; Underwood DL; Will JC
J Fam Pract; 1993 Jul; 37(1):49-56. PubMed ID: 8345340
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of mydriasis and different field strategies on digital image screening of diabetic eye disease.
Murgatroyd H; Ellingford A; Cox A; Binnie M; Ellis JD; MacEwen CJ; Leese GP
Br J Ophthalmol; 2004 Jul; 88(7):920-4. PubMed ID: 15205238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparative study of the polaroid and digital non-mydriatic cameras in the detection of referrable diabetic retinopathy in Australia.
Phiri R; Keeffe JE; Harper CA; Taylor HR
Diabet Med; 2006 Aug; 23(8):867-72. PubMed ID: 16911624
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Joslin Vision Network Validation Study: pilot image stabilization phase.
Aiello LM; Bursell SE; Cavallerano J; Gardner WK; Strong J
J Am Optom Assoc; 1998 Nov; 69(11):699-710. PubMed ID: 9844322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The incorporation of family physicians in the assessment of diabetic retinopathy by non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Romero P; Sagarra R; Ferrer J; Fernández-Ballart J; Baget M
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88(2):184-8. PubMed ID: 20189672
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Diagnostic accuracy of non-mydriatic fundus camera for screening of diabetic retinopathy: A hospital based observational study in Pakistan.
Fahadullah M; Memon NA; Salim S; Ahsan S; Fahim MF; Mumtaz SN; Shaikh SA; Memon MS
J Pak Med Assoc; 2019 Mar; 69(3):378-382. PubMed ID: 30890831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Screening for diabetic retinopathy: the utility of nonmydriatic retinal photography in Egyptian adults.
Penman AD; Saaddine JB; Hegazy M; Sous ES; Ali MA; Brechner RJ; Herman WH; Engelgau MM; Klein R
Diabet Med; 1998 Sep; 15(9):783-7. PubMed ID: 9737809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Retinopathy screening in type 2 diabetes: reliability of wide angle fundus photography.
de Sonnaville JJ; van der Feltz van der Sloot D; Ernst L; Wijkel D; Heine RJ
Diabet Med; 1996 May; 13(5):482-6. PubMed ID: 8737032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of a digital retinal imaging system and seven-field stereo color fundus photography to detect diabetic retinopathy in the primary care environment.
Schiffman RM; Jacobsen G; Nussbaum JJ; Desai UR; Carey JD; Glasser D; Zimmer-Galler IE; Zeimer R; Goldberg MF
Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging; 2005; 36(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 15688971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Web-based grading of compressed stereoscopic digital photography versus standard slide film photography for the diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy.
Rudnisky CJ; Tennant MT; Weis E; Ting A; Hinz BJ; Greve MD
Ophthalmology; 2007 Sep; 114(9):1748-54. PubMed ID: 17368543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic accuracy of direct ophthalmoscopy for detection of diabetic retinopathy using fundus photographs as a reference standard.
Ahsan S; Basit A; Ahmed KR; Ali L; Shaheen F; Ulhaque MS; Fawwad A
Diabetes Metab Syndr; 2014; 8(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 24907174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photographs for detecting and grading diabetic retinopathy.
Kinyoun JL; Martin DC; Fujimoto WY; Leonetti DL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1992 May; 33(6):1888-93. PubMed ID: 1582794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Screening of diabetic retinopathy: effect of field number and mydriasis on sensitivity and specificity of digital fundus photography.
Aptel F; Denis P; Rouberol F; Thivolet C
Diabetes Metab; 2008 Jun; 34(3):290-3. PubMed ID: 18406188
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
