256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9633202)
21. Entoptic evaluation of diabetic retinopathy.
Applegate RA; Bradley A; van Heuven WA; Lee BL; Garcia CA
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 1997 Apr; 38(5):783-91. PubMed ID: 9112972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Accuracy of single-field nonmydriatic digital fundus image in screening for diabetic retinopathy.
Suansilpong A; Rawdaree P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 Sep; 91(9):1397-403. PubMed ID: 18843870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparison of the effectiveness of detecting diabetic eye disease: diabetic retinal photography versus ophthalmic consultation.
Chia DS; Yap EY
Singapore Med J; 2004 Jun; 45(6):276-9. PubMed ID: 15181522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Nonmydriatic digital retinal images for determining diabetic retinopathy.
Tanterdtham J; Singalavanija A; Namatra C; Trinavarat A; Rodanant N; Bamroongsuk P; Thoongsuwan S; Euasobhon W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Mar; 90(3):508-12. PubMed ID: 17427528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Can we predict which patients are at risk of having an ungradeable digital image for screening for diabetic retinopathy?
Murgatroyd H; Cox A; Ellingford A; Ellis JD; Macewen CJ; Leese GP
Eye (Lond); 2008 Mar; 22(3):344-8. PubMed ID: 17024219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Duration of diabetes and screening coverage for retinopathy among patients with type 2 diabetes.
Soto-Pedre E; Hernaez-Ortega MC; Piniés JA
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2007; 14(2):76-9. PubMed ID: 17464854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy. Ophthalmoscopy versus fundus photography.
Lee VS; Kingsley RM; Lee ET; Lu M; Russell D; Asal NR; Bradford RH; Wilkinson CP
Ophthalmology; 1993 Oct; 100(10):1504-12. PubMed ID: 8414411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a digital non-mydriatic camera compared with standard 35-mm stereo colour transparencies.
Hansen AB; Sander B; Larsen M; Kleener J; Borch-Johnsen K; Klein R; Lund-Andersen H
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):656-65. PubMed ID: 15606460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Diabetic retinopathy screening using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography and automated image analysis.
Hansen AB; Hartvig NV; Jensen MS; Borch-Johnsen K; Lund-Andersen H; Larsen M
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Dec; 82(6):666-72. PubMed ID: 15606461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Results of laser photocoagulation in patients with diabetic retinopathy developed as a complication of diabetes type 2].
Wilczyński M; Dzivgielewski K
Klin Oczna; 2006; 108(1-3):66-9. PubMed ID: 16883944
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Preventing diabetes blindness: cost effectiveness of a screening programme using digital non-mydriatic fundus photography for diabetic retinopathy in a primary health care setting in South Africa.
Khan T; Bertram MY; Jina R; Mash B; Levitt N; Hofman K
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2013 Aug; 101(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 23796361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Sensitivity and specificity of automated analysis of single-field non-mydriatic fundus photographs by Bosch DR Algorithm-Comparison with mydriatic fundus photography (ETDRS) for screening in undiagnosed diabetic retinopathy.
Bawankar P; Shanbhag N; K SS; Dhawan B; Palsule A; Kumar D; Chandel S; Sood S
PLoS One; 2017; 12(12):e0189854. PubMed ID: 29281690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Abnormal Cambridge low-contrast grating sensitivity results associated with diabetic retinopathy as a potential screening tool.
Abrishami M; Heravian J; Derakhshan A; Mousavi M; Banaee T; Daneshvar R; Moghaddam HO
East Mediterr Health J; 2007; 13(4):810-8. PubMed ID: 17955763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The sensitivity and specificity of nonmydriatic digital stereoscopic retinal imaging in detecting diabetic retinopathy.
Ahmed J; Ward TP; Bursell SE; Aiello LM; Cavallerano JD; Vigersky RA
Diabetes Care; 2006 Oct; 29(10):2205-9. PubMed ID: 17003294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Instant electronic imaging systems are superior to Polaroid at detecting sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy.
Ryder RE; Kong N; Bates AS; Sim J; Welch J; Kritzinger EE
Diabet Med; 1998 Mar; 15(3):254-8. PubMed ID: 9545128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. A comparison of digital retinal image quality among photographers with different levels of training using a non-mydriatic fundus camera.
Maberley D; Morris A; Hay D; Chang A; Hall L; Mandava N
Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2004 Jul; 11(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 15370551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Systematic screening for diabetic retinopathy with a digital fundus camera following pupillary dilatation in a university diabetes department.
Deb-Joardar N; Germain N; Thuret G; Garcin A-; Manoli P; Defreyn A; Gain P; Estour B
Diabet Med; 2007 Mar; 24(3):303-7. PubMed ID: 17263768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Screening for diabetic retinopathy using a non-mydriatic retinal camera in rural Victoria.
Harper CA; Livingston PM; Wood C; Jin C; Lee SJ; Keeffe JE; McCarty CA; Taylor HR
Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1998 May; 26(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 9630291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Sensitivity and specificity of digital retinal images in grading diabetic retinopathy.
Saari JM; Summanen P; Kivelä T; Saari KM
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2004 Apr; 82(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 15043527
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy in Trang province determined by retinal photography and comprehensive eye examination.
Supapluksakul S; Ruamviboonsuk P; Chaowakul W
J Med Assoc Thai; 2008 May; 91(5):716-22. PubMed ID: 18672638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
