These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9634394)

  • 41. Should genes be patented? The gene patenting controversy: legal, ethical, and policy foundations of an international agreement.
    Looney B
    Law Policy Int Bus; 1994; 26(1):231-72. PubMed ID: 11979605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. The human genome. Objection #1: big biology is bad biology.
    Service RF
    Science; 2001 Feb; 291(5507):1182. PubMed ID: 11233423
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Too many noughts.
    Watson JD
    Nature; 1991 Apr; 350(6319):550. PubMed ID: 2017250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. NIH awards genome project grant to Baylor College of Medicine.
    Tex Med; 1991 Feb; 87(2):22-3. PubMed ID: 2031224
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. 'Playing chicken' over gene markers.
    Marshall E
    Science; 1997 Dec; 278(5346):2046-8. PubMed ID: 9432713
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Patents and the Human Genome Project.
    Smith GK; Kettelberger DM
    AIPLA Q J; 1994; 22(1):27-64. PubMed ID: 11660522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. U.S. seeks patent on genetic codes, setting off furor.
    Andrews EL
    N Y Times Web; 1991 Oct; ():A1, A12. PubMed ID: 11647909
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. In the crossfire: Collins on genomes, patents, and 'rivalry'. Interview by Eliot Marshall, Elizabeth Pennisi, and Leslie Roberts.
    Collins F
    Science; 2000 Mar; 287(5462):2396-8. PubMed ID: 10766612
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. OSTP to wade into gene patent quagmire.
    Roberts L
    Science; 1991 Nov; 254(5035):1104-5. PubMed ID: 1957160
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. MRC delays plans to charge for genome data.
    Stewart A
    BMJ; 1991 Nov; 303(6814):1353-4. PubMed ID: 11642939
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A new five-year plan for the U.S. Human Genome Project.
    Collins F; Galas D
    Science; 1993 Oct; 262(5130):43-6. PubMed ID: 8211127
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Venter backs call for more public funds.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 May; 393(6683):296. PubMed ID: 9620787
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. The Human Genome Project: lessons from large-scale biology.
    Collins FS; Morgan M; Patrinos A
    Science; 2003 Apr; 300(5617):286-90. PubMed ID: 12690187
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. So many choices, so little money.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2001 Oct; 294(5540):82-5. PubMed ID: 11588245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. The Human Genome Project: two points of view.
    FASEB J; 1990 Aug; 4(11):2941-2. PubMed ID: 2379768
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Genomics. Rat genome off to an early start.
    Pennisi E
    Science; 2000 Aug; 289(5483):1267-9. PubMed ID: 10979842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Funding sequencing efforts.
    Bond E; Austin MJ
    Science; 1997 Feb; 275(5303):1051-2. PubMed ID: 9054002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. The genome project: life after Watson.
    Palca J
    Science; 1992 May; 256(5059):956-8. PubMed ID: 1589774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Company aims to beat NIH human genome efforts.
    Wadman M
    Nature; 1998 May; 393(6681):101. PubMed ID: 9603505
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Human genome project. The honeymoon is over.
    Anderson GC
    Nature; 1990 Jul; 346(6282):309. PubMed ID: 2374602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.