These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9637028)

  • 1. Predicting hearing aid response in real ears.
    Sanborn PE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3407-17. PubMed ID: 9637028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transverse pressure distributions in a simple model ear canal occluded by a hearing aid test fixture.
    Stinson MR; Daigle GA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Jun; 121(6):3689-702. PubMed ID: 17552720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Acoustic mechanisms that determine the ear-canal sound pressures generated by earphones.
    Voss SE; Rosowski JJ; Shera CA; Peake WT
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2000 Mar; 107(3):1548-65. PubMed ID: 10738809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sound pressure in insert earphone couplers and real ears.
    Burkhard MD; Sachs RM
    J Speech Hear Res; 1977 Dec; 20(4):799-807. PubMed ID: 604691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Occluded-ear simulator with variable acoustic properties.
    Egolf DP; Kennedy WA; Larson VD
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 May; 91(5):2813-23. PubMed ID: 1629475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The effect of occluded ear impedances on the eardrum SPL produced by hearing aids.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD; Stern R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1981 Aug; 70(2):370-86. PubMed ID: 7288025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Accuracy and reliability of a real-ear-to-coupler difference measurement procedure implemented within a behind-the-ear hearing aid.
    Scollie S; Bagatto M; Moodie S; Crukley J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Oct; 22(9):612-622. PubMed ID: 22192606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Ear canal pressure variations versus negative middle ear pressure: comparison using distortion product otoacoustic emission measurement in humans.
    Sun XM
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(1):69-78. PubMed ID: 21747284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Basic acoustic considerations of ear canal probe measurements.
    Dirks DD; Kincaid GE
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5 Suppl):60S-67S. PubMed ID: 3678652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Procedures for ambient-pressure and tympanometric tests of aural acoustic reflectance and admittance in human infants and adults.
    Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Feeney MP; Fitzpatrick DF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3625-53. PubMed ID: 26723319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of normal and pathologic eardrum impedance on sound pressure in the aided ear canal: a computer simulation.
    Egolf DP; Feth LL; Cooper WA; Franks JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1281-5. PubMed ID: 3840499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Prediction of conductive hearing loss based on acoustic ear-canal response using a multivariate clinical decision theory.
    Piskorski P; Keefe DH; Simmons JL; Gorga MP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Mar; 105(3):1749-64. PubMed ID: 10089599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement of acoustic impedance and reflectance in the human ear canal.
    Voss SE; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Jan; 95(1):372-84. PubMed ID: 8120248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Side branch and parallel vent effects in real ears and in acoustical and electrical models.
    Studebaker GA; Cox RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):108-17. PubMed ID: 914672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in situ calibration for hearing thresholds.
    Withnell RH; Jeng PS; Waldvogel K; Morgenstein K; Allen JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar; 125(3):1605-11. PubMed ID: 19275318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Normative Wideband Reflectance, Equivalent Admittance at the Tympanic Membrane, and Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Threshold in Adults.
    Feeney MP; Keefe DH; Hunter LL; Fitzpatrick DF; Garinis AC; Putterman DB; McMillan GP
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(3):e142-e160. PubMed ID: 28045835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. System identification of feedback in hearing aids.
    Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3481-96. PubMed ID: 10380671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.