These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9637037)

  • 1. Evidence for an across-frequency, between-channel process in asymptotic monaural temporal gap detection.
    Formby C; Gerber MJ; Sherlock LP; Magder LS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Jun; 103(6):3554-60. PubMed ID: 9637037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporal gap detection measured with multiple sinusoidal markers: effects of marker number, frequency, and temporal position.
    Formby C; Sherlock LP; Li S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Aug; 104(2 Pt 1):984-98. PubMed ID: 9714918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Between-Frequency and Between-Ear Gap Detections and Their Relation to Perception of Stop Consonants.
    Mori S; Oyama K; Kikuchi Y; Mitsudo T; Hirose N
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):464-70. PubMed ID: 25565661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of temporal gaps in sinusoids: effects of frequency and level.
    Moore BC; Peters RW; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Mar; 93(3):1563-70. PubMed ID: 8473610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of silent temporal gaps in sinusoidal markers.
    Formby C; Forrest TG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1991 Feb; 89(2):830-7. PubMed ID: 2016432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system.
    Strouse A; Ashmead DH; Ohde RN; Grantham DW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2385-99. PubMed ID: 10491702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The role of frequency selectivity in measures of auditory and vibrotactile temporal resolution.
    Formby C; Morgan LN; Forrest TG; Raney JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jan; 91(1):293-305. PubMed ID: 1737878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of age and hearing loss on gap detection and the precedence effect: narrow-band stimuli.
    Lister JJ; Roberts RA
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2005 Apr; 48(2):482-93. PubMed ID: 15989406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners.
    Phillips DP; Smith JC
    Perception; 2004; 33(3):371-8. PubMed ID: 15176620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in auditory performance between monaural and dichotic conditions. I: masking thresholds in frozen noise.
    Langhans A; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Jun; 91(6):3456-70. PubMed ID: 1619122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modulation gap detection: effects of modulation rate, carrier separation, and mode of presentation.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Aug; 106(2):946-53. PubMed ID: 10462800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Gap duration discrimination in listeners with cochlear hearing loss: effects of gap and marker duration, frequency separation, and mode of presentation.
    Grose JH; Hall JW; Buss E
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2001 Dec; 2(4):388-98. PubMed ID: 11833611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Gap detection and the precedence effect in young and old adults.
    Schneider BA; Pichora-Fuller MK; Kowalchuk D; Lamb M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Feb; 95(2):980-91. PubMed ID: 8132912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A binaural analog of gap detection.
    Akeroyd MA; Summerfield AQ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 May; 105(5):2807-20. PubMed ID: 10335632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. "Central" auditory gap detection: a spatial case.
    Phillips DP; Hall SE; Harrington IA; Taylor TL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2064-8. PubMed ID: 9566328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Within- and across-channel gap detection in cochlear implant listeners.
    Grose JH; Buss E
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2007 Dec; 122(6):3651-8. PubMed ID: 18247772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Directional Effects of Marker Frequencies on Across-Channel Temporal Gap Detection Tasks: An Experimental Study.
    Alhaidary A; Tanniru K; Bin Moammar A; Aljadaan A
    Audiol Neurootol; 2024; 29(5):374-381. PubMed ID: 38471471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Signal properties that reduce masking by simultaneous, random-frequency maskers.
    Neff DL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Oct; 98(4):1909-20. PubMed ID: 7593915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gap detection with sinusoids and noise in normal, impaired, and electrically stimulated ears.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Mar; 83(3):1093-101. PubMed ID: 3356814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Diotic and dichotic detection using multiplied-noise maskers.
    van de Par S; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Apr; 103(4):2100-10. PubMed ID: 9566331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.