These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9637055)

  • 1. Evolution of segregation distortion: potential for a high degree of polymorphism.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    J Theor Biol; 1998 May; 192(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 9637055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Competition at the mouse t complex: rare alleles are inherently favored.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):343-58. PubMed ID: 11878834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. COMPETITION BETWEEN SEGREGATION DISTORTERS: COEXISTENCE OF "SUPERIOR" AND "INFERIOR" HAPLOTYPES AT THE t COMPLEX.
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ; Heg D; Huisman J
    Evolution; 1996 Dec; 50(6):2488-2498. PubMed ID: 28565654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Segregation distortion and the evolution of sex-determining mechanisms.
    Kozielska M; Weissing FJ; Beukeboom LW; Pen I
    Heredity (Edinb); 2010 Jan; 104(1):100-12. PubMed ID: 19672280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Gene-culture coevolution and sex ratios: II. Sex-chromosomal distorters and cultural preferences for offspring sex.
    Kumm J; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Aug; 52(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 9345791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sex-ratio distorter of Drosophila simulans reduces male productivity and sperm competition ability.
    Atlan A; Joly D; Capillon C; Montchamp-Moreau C
    J Evol Biol; 2004 Jul; 17(4):744-51. PubMed ID: 15271073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selection and segregation distortion in a sex-differentiated population.
    Weissing FJ; van Boven M
    Theor Popul Biol; 2001 Dec; 60(4):327-41. PubMed ID: 11878833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Fitness consequences of the selfish supergene Segregation Distorter.
    Wong HWS; Holman L
    J Evol Biol; 2020 Jan; 33(1):89-100. PubMed ID: 31605400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The evolution of costly mate choice against segregation distorters.
    Manser A; Lindholm AK; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2017 Dec; 71(12):2817-2828. PubMed ID: 29071709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Evolution at the mouse t complex: why is the t haplotype preserved as an integral unit?
    van Boven M; Weissing FJ
    Evolution; 2000 Oct; 54(5):1795-808. PubMed ID: 11108606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Is heterozygous advantage necessary for polymorphism in one-locus two-allele systems?
    Zhang DY; Jiang XH
    J Theor Biol; 1994 Feb; 166(3):245-50. PubMed ID: 8159012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Nonrandom segregation during meiosis: the unfairness of females.
    Pardo-Manuel de Villena F; Sapienza C
    Mamm Genome; 2001 May; 12(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 11331939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does genetic conflict drive rapid molecular evolution of nuclear transport genes in Drosophila?
    Presgraves DC
    Bioessays; 2007 Apr; 29(4):386-91. PubMed ID: 17373698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assortative mate choice and dominance modification: alternative ways of removing heterozygote disadvantage.
    Durinx M; Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2009 Feb; 63(2):334-52. PubMed ID: 19054051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effects of density dependence and immigration on local adaptation and niche evolution in a black-hole sink environment.
    Gomulkiewicz R; Holt RD; Barfield M
    Theor Popul Biol; 1999 Jun; 55(3):283-96. PubMed ID: 10366553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Why is Mendelian segregation so exact?
    Crow JF
    Bioessays; 1991 Jun; 13(6):305-12. PubMed ID: 1909864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Protected polymorphism and evolutionary stability in pleiotropic models with trait-specific dominance.
    Van Dooren TJ
    Evolution; 2006 Oct; 60(10):1991-2003. PubMed ID: 17133856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evolution under the multiallelic Levene model.
    Nagylaki T; Lou Y
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Dec; 70(4):401-11. PubMed ID: 16697023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A model for the mechanism of transmission ratio distortion and for t-associated hybrid sterility.
    Hurst LD
    Proc Biol Sci; 1993 Jul; 253(1336):83-91. PubMed ID: 8396780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Gene-Culture Coevolution and Sex Ratios: II. Sex-Chromosomal Distorters and Cultural Preferences for Offspring Sex.
    Kumm J; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Aug; 7(1):1-15. PubMed ID: 9356319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.