These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9637094)

  • 1. [Comparison of different phonetic materials for perceptive analysis of dysphonia].
    Révis J; Giovanni A; Wuyts F; Triglia JM
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1997; 118(4):247-52. PubMed ID: 9637094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.
    Van Lierde KM; Monstrey S; Bonte K; Van Cauwenberge P; Vinck B
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2004 Jul; 68(7):865-75. PubMed ID: 15183576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of different voice samples for perceptual analysis.
    Revis J; Giovanni A; Wuyts F; Triglia J
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 1999; 51(3):108-16. PubMed ID: 10394058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Task specificity in adductor spasmodic dysphonia versus muscle tension dysphonia.
    Roy N; Gouse M; Mauszycki SC; Merrill RM; Smith ME
    Laryngoscope; 2005 Feb; 115(2):311-6. PubMed ID: 15689757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Objective vocal evaluation of dysphonia by simultaneous measurement of acoustic and aerodynamic parameters with the EVA device].
    Giovanni A; Estublier N; Robert D; Teston B; Zanaret M; Cannoni M
    Ann Otolaryngol Chir Cervicofac; 1995; 112(3):85-90. PubMed ID: 7486713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Objective voice analysis for dysphonic patients: a multiparametric protocol including acoustic and aerodynamic measurements.
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Revis J; Giovanni A
    J Voice; 2001 Dec; 15(4):529-42. PubMed ID: 11792029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of vowel context on the recognition of initial and medial consonants by cochlear implant users.
    Donaldson GS; Kreft HA
    Ear Hear; 2006 Dec; 27(6):658-77. PubMed ID: 17086077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of speaking task on perceptual judgment of the severity of dysphonic voice.
    Zraick RI; Wendel K; Smith-Olinde L
    J Voice; 2005 Dec; 19(4):574-81. PubMed ID: 16301103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of perceptual training on inexperienced listeners' judgments of dysphonic voice.
    Eadie TL; Baylor CR
    J Voice; 2006 Dec; 20(4):527-44. PubMed ID: 16324823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Objective voice analysis in dysphonic patients: new data including nonlinear measurements.
    Yu P; Garrel R; Nicollas R; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2007; 59(1):20-30. PubMed ID: 17172783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Use of cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from dysphonic voices: a comparative study of connected speech versus sustained vowel in European Portuguese female speakers.
    Brinca LF; Batista AP; Tavares AI; Gonçalves IC; Moreno ML
    J Voice; 2014 May; 28(3):282-6. PubMed ID: 24491499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Toward the development of an objective index of dysphonia severity: a four-factor acoustic model.
    Awan SN; Roy N
    Clin Linguist Phon; 2006; 20(1):35-49. PubMed ID: 16393797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Definition of a new temporal voice onset measurement].
    Revis J; Barberis S; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):291-6. PubMed ID: 11387651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Clinical significance of calculating the coefficients of Lyapunov in the objective assessment of dysphonia].
    Yu P; Ouaknine M; Giovanni A
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2000; 121(5):301-5. PubMed ID: 11387653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: a meta-analysis.
    Maryn Y; Roy N; De Bodt M; Van Cauwenberge P; Corthals P
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Nov; 126(5):2619-34. PubMed ID: 19894840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Learning English vowels with different first-language vowel systems II: Auditory training for native Spanish and German speakers.
    Iverson P; Evans BG
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Aug; 126(2):866-77. PubMed ID: 19640051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Perception of coarticulatory information in normal speech and dysarthria.
    Tjaden K; Sussman J
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Aug; 49(4):888-902. PubMed ID: 16908883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Automatic evaluation of tracheoesophageal substitute voice: sustained vowel versus standard text.
    Bocklet T; Toy H; Nöth E; Schuster M; Eysholdt U; Rosanowski F; Gottwald F; Haderlein T
    Folia Phoniatr Logop; 2009; 61(2):112-6. PubMed ID: 19321983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of spectral/cepstral analyses for differentiating normal from hypofunctional voices in sustained vowel and continuous speech contexts.
    Watts CR; Awan SN
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2011 Dec; 54(6):1525-37. PubMed ID: 22180020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Electroglottographic analysis of valved speech following total laryngectomy.
    Kazi R; Singh A; Al-Mutairy A; de Cordova J; O'Leary L; Nutting C; Clarke P; Evans PR; Harrington K
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2008; 33(1):12-21. PubMed ID: 18344141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.