1023 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9637570)
21. The morphologic basis for the extraction decision in Class II, division 1 malocclusions: a comparative study.
Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Jakobsen JR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Feb; 107(2):129-35. PubMed ID: 7847270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Long-term stability of Angle Class II, division 1 malocclusions with successful occlusal results at end of active treatment.
Fidler BC; Artun J; Joondeph DR; Little RM
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1995 Mar; 107(3):276-85. PubMed ID: 7879760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effects of the pendulum appliance, cervical headgear, and 2 premolar extractions followed by fixed appliances in patients with Class II malocclusion.
de Almeida-Pedrin RR; Henriques JF; de Almeida RR; de Almeida MR; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Dec; 136(6):833-42. PubMed ID: 19962606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Class II correction in Herbst and Bass therapy.
Pancherz H; Malmgren O; Hägg U; Omblus J; Hansen K
Eur J Orthod; 1989 Feb; 11(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 2714389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Stability and relapse of maxillary anterior crowding treatment in class I and class II Division 1 malocclusions.
Quaglio CL; de Freitas KM; de Freitas MR; Janson G; Henriques JF
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Jun; 139(6):768-74. PubMed ID: 21640883
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparison of Activator-Headgear and Twin Block Treatment Approaches in Class II Division 1 Malocclusion.
Spalj S; Mroz Tranesen K; Birkeland K; Katic V; Pavlic A; Vandevska-Radunovic V
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():4861924. PubMed ID: 28203569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition.
Croft RS; Buschang PH; English JD; Meyer R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):435-43. PubMed ID: 10511673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. A cephalometric appraisal of edgewise Class II nonextraction treatment with extraoral force.
Cangialosi TJ; Meistrell ME; Leung MA; Ko JY
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1988 Apr; 93(4):315-24. PubMed ID: 3162641
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of activator and high-pull headgear combination therapy: skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue profile changes.
Marşan G
Eur J Orthod; 2007 Apr; 29(2):140-8. PubMed ID: 17488997
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A long-term comparison of nonextraction and premolar extraction edgewise therapy in "borderline" Class II patients.
Paquette DE; Beattie JR; Johnston LE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Jul; 102(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 1626523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Dentoalveolar and skeletal changes associated with the pendulum appliance.
Bussick TJ; McNamara JA
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):333-43. PubMed ID: 10715093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The extraction of permanent second molars and its effect on the dentofacial complex of patients treated with the Tip-Edge appliance.
Greatrex PA; Sampson WJ; Richards LC; Twelftree CC
Eur J Orthod; 2002 Oct; 24(5):501-18. PubMed ID: 12407946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparative efficiency of Class II malocclusion treatment with the pendulum appliance or two maxillary premolar extractions and edgewise appliances [corrected].
Pinzan-Vercelino CR; Janson G; Pinzan A; de Almeida RR; de Freitas MR; de Freitas KM
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Jun; 31(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 19395372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Treatment and posttreatment changes in patients with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion after extraction and nonextraction treatment.
Bishara SE; Cummins DM; Zaher AR
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Jan; 111(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 9009919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Class II malocclusion with maxillary protrusion from the deciduous through the mixed dentition: a longitudinal study.
Antonini A; Marinelli A; Baroni G; Franchi L; Defraia E
Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 16448241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Crowding and spacing in the dental arches: long-term development in treated and untreated subjects.
Jonsson T; Magnusson TE
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Oct; 138(4):384.e1-384.e7. PubMed ID: 20889033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances.
Tomblyn T; Rogers M; Andrews L; Martin C; Tremont T; Gunel E; Ngan P
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Nov; 150(5):818-830. PubMed ID: 27871709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Orthodontic treatment changes of chin position in Class II Division 1 patients.
LaHaye MB; Buschang PH; Alexander RG; Boley JC
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 Dec; 130(6):732-41. PubMed ID: 17169735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. The effect of treatment with the Bass appliance on skeletal Class II malocclusions: a cephalometric investigation.
Cura N; Saraç M
Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):691-702. PubMed ID: 9458602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Classification and treatment of Class II subdivision malocclusions.
Cassidy SE; Jackson SR; Turpin DL; Ramsay DS; Spiekerman C; Huang GJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Apr; 145(4):443-51. PubMed ID: 24703282
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
