These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9638296)
1. Testing and evaluation of surgical gown fabrics: comments and concerns. Zins HM Am J Infect Control; 1998 Jun; 26(3):364-5. PubMed ID: 9638296 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. " False faith in the surgeon's gown" revisited. Belkin NL Bull Am Coll Surg; 2005 Apr; 90(4):19-23, 56. PubMed ID: 18435120 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The relationship of selected fabric characteristics and the barrier effectiveness of surgical gown fabrics. Leonas KK; Jinkins RS Am J Infect Control; 1997 Feb; 25(1):16-23. PubMed ID: 9057939 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The evaluation of fabrics in relation to their use as protective garments in nursing and surgery. I. Physical measurements and bench tests. Lidwell OM; Mackintosh CA J Hyg (Lond); 1978 Dec; 81(3):433-52. PubMed ID: 731024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Choosing the right FR fabrics and apparel. Kaminsky R; Ponthan R Occup Health Saf; 2013 Aug; 82(8):28, 30. PubMed ID: 24000566 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. American standards for UV-protective textiles. Hatch KL Recent Results Cancer Res; 2002; 160():42-7. PubMed ID: 12079236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fluorescent dye, pesticide and surfactant penetration tested in simulated spill. Part II. Nonwoven fabrics as barriers. Boyd CR; Ramaswamy GN Bull Environ Contam Toxicol; 1994 Dec; 53(6):919-23. PubMed ID: 7881223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Are new test methods accurate predictors of gowns' protective barrier effectiveness? Stull JO AORN J; 1994 Jul; 60(1):24-5. PubMed ID: 8085801 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The evaluation of fabrics in relation to their use as protective garments in nursing and surgery. II. Dispersal of skin organisms in a test chamber. Lidwell OM; Mackintosh CA; Towers AG J Hyg (Lond); 1978 Dec; 81(3):453-69. PubMed ID: 731025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effect of laundering on the barrier properties of reusable surgical gown fabrics. Leonas KK Am J Infect Control; 1998 Oct; 26(5):495-501. PubMed ID: 9795678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Are new test methods accurate predictors of gowns' protective barrier effectiveness? Belkin NL AORN J; 1994 Apr; 59(4):897-9. PubMed ID: 8210247 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of the pig as a bioassay substrate for evaluation of thermal protective clothing and physical sensor calibration. Knox FS; McCahan GR; Wachtel TL Aerosp Med; 1974 Aug; 45(8):933-8. PubMed ID: 4844253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The new barrier standard--whose interests does it serve? Belkin NL AORN J; 2004 Oct; 80(4):647-51. PubMed ID: 15526698 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Protective clothing for pesticide operators: part II--data analysis of fabric characteristics. Shaw A; Schiffelbein P Int J Occup Saf Ergon; 2016; 22(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 26327159 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. If there now is a "standard test" for barrier materials, why the need for two more? Belkin NL Am J Infect Control; 2004 Aug; 32(5):313-6. PubMed ID: 15320340 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Apparel textiles and sun protection: a marketing opportunity or a quality control nightmare? Pailthorpe M Mutat Res; 1998 Nov; 422(1):175-83. PubMed ID: 9920443 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]