128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9638375)
1. False-negative cervical smears: medico-legal fallacies and suggested remedies.
Slater DN
Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):145-54. PubMed ID: 9638375
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Screening for breast and cervical cancer as a common cause for litigation. A false negative result may be one of an irreducible minimum of errors.
Wilson RM
BMJ; 2000 May; 320(7246):1352-3. PubMed ID: 10818006
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. A smear on audit. Implications of the Leicester cervical smear audit.
Symonds P; Naftalin N; Shaw P
BJOG; 2003 Jul; 110(7):646-8. PubMed ID: 12842054
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. HPV: from the cervical smear to the research bench to the court room.
Atkins K
Clin Leadersh Manag Rev; 2003; 17(6):341-5. PubMed ID: 14692078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Is it reality or an illusion that liquid-based cytology is better than conventional cervical smears?
Kitchener HC
Cytopathology; 2002 Feb; 13(1):64-5. PubMed ID: 11985571
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Automated cytologic screening devices and malpractice liability.
Skoumal SM; Cohen MB
Diagn Cytopathol; 1997 Aug; 17(2):85-7. PubMed ID: 9258613
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Medicolegal affairs. International Academy of Cytology Task Force summary. Diagnostic Cytology Towards the 21st Century: An International Expert Conference and Tutorial.
Frable WJ; Austin RM; Greening SE; Collins RJ; Hillman RL; Kobler TP; Koss LG; Mitchell H; Perey R; Rosenthal DL; Sidoti MS; Somrak TM
Acta Cytol; 1998; 42(1):76-119; discussion 120-32. PubMed ID: 9479326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The current status of the Papanicolaou smear.
Shingleton HM; Patrick RL; Johnston WW; Smith RA
CA Cancer J Clin; 1995; 45(5):305-20. PubMed ID: 7656133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Gynaecological cytopathology and the search for perfection: civil liability and regulatory ramifications.
Freckelton I
J Law Med; 2003 Nov; 11(2):185-200. PubMed ID: 14655583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Can we change the way we screen?: the ThinPrep Imaging System.
Dawson AE
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):340-4. PubMed ID: 15540250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Liability issues with the Papanicolaou smear: a defense lawyer's perspective.
Varner CD
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1997 Mar; 121(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 9111126
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The Pap smear liability crisis.
McCoy DR; Sidoti MS
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):274-80. PubMed ID: 10439810
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening and litigation. Some false negatives arise from negligence.
Coleman DV
BMJ; 2000 Sep; 321(7263):761. PubMed ID: 10999919
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The perspective of a plaintiff's attorney in dissembling the art of medicine as it relates to the interpretation and management of cervical smears.
Meyers JI
Am J Clin Pathol; 2001 Dec; 116 Suppl():S116-22. PubMed ID: 11993696
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Three women win in cancer screening case.
Dyer C
BMJ; 1999 Feb; 318(7182):484. PubMed ID: 10094532
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The standard of care in cytopathology.
Gatter K
Am J Clin Pathol; 1999 Aug; 112(2):273-4. PubMed ID: 10439809
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Improvement in the routine screening of cervical smears: A study using rapid prescreening and 100% rapid review as internal quality control methods.
Tavares SB; Alves de Sousa NL; Manrique EJ; Pinheiro de Albuquerque ZB; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG
Cancer Cytopathol; 2011 Dec; 119(6):367-76. PubMed ID: 21954191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Paired cervical smears: a method of reducing the false-negative rate in population screening.
Beilby JO; Bourne R; Guillebaud J; Steele ST
Obstet Gynecol; 1982 Jul; 60(1):46-8. PubMed ID: 7088450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cervical screening blues.
Skegg DC
Lancet; 1995 Jun; 345(8963):1451-2. PubMed ID: 7769896
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Papanicolaou smear: can we make a good test better? Technical and interpretive challenges for the practitioner.
Eltabbakh GH; Eltabbakh GD
J Womens Health Gend Based Med; 1999 May; 8(4):469-76. PubMed ID: 10839701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
