119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9638378)
1. Achievable laboratory standards; a review of cytology of 99 women with cervical cancer.
Womack C; Warren AY
Cytopathology; 1998 Jun; 9(3):171-7. PubMed ID: 9638378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Achievable standards, benchmarks for reporting and criteria for evaluating cervical cytopathology.
Herbert A; Johnson J; Patnick J
Cytopathology; 1995 Oct; 6(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 8785367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. High-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion in women aged <30 years has a prevalence pattern resembling low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion.
Vale DB; Westin MC; Zeferino LC
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Oct; 121(10):576-81. PubMed ID: 23765869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Safety of extending screening intervals beyond five years in cervical screening programmes with testing for high risk human papillomavirus: 14 year follow-up of population based randomised cohort in the Netherlands.
Dijkstra MG; van Zummeren M; Rozendaal L; van Kemenade FJ; Helmerhorst TJ; Snijders PJ; Meijer CJ; Berkhof J
BMJ; 2016 Oct; 355():i4924. PubMed ID: 27702796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Incidence of abnormal cervical and vaginal cytology among women over age 65 years living with human immunodeficiency virus.
Stewart KA; Allen SM; Chesnokova AE; Syed F; Levison JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2020 May; 222(5):486.e1-486.e10. PubMed ID: 31678094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT.
Gilham C; Sargent A; Kitchener HC; Peto J
Health Technol Assess; 2019 Jun; 23(28):1-44. PubMed ID: 31219027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of cytological findings in abnormal cervical smears by cytohistologic comparison.
Mostafa MG; Srivannaboon S; Rachanawutanon M
Indian J Pathol Microbiol; 2000 Jan; 43(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 12583415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of a randomized trial on the management of cytology interpretations of atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1383-92. PubMed ID: 12824967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Ci PW; Zhang WH; Guo HQ; Cao J; Zhao FH; Lytwyn A; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An audit of standards of the 'see and treat' approach in women with a high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion on Pap smears.
Kietpeerakool C; Buttura R; Srisomboon J
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Jul; 29(5):430-3. PubMed ID: 19603324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Combining high-risk human papillomavirus DNA test and cytological test to detect early cervical dysplasia].
Qian DY; Cen JM; Wang D; Zeng RH; Lin AH; Shu YH; Hong DH; Huang ZH
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jan; 41(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 16635326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized trial on the management of low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion cytology interpretations.
ASCUS-LSIL Traige Study (ALTS) Group
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jun; 188(6):1393-400. PubMed ID: 12824968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Risk Stratification Using Human Papillomavirus Testing among Women with Equivocally Abnormal Cytology: Results from a State-Wide Surveillance Program.
Gage JC; Hunt WC; Schiffman M; Katki HA; Cheung LC; Cuzick J; Myers O; Castle PE; Wheeler CM;
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2016 Jan; 25(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 26518316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An audit of cervical cytology in HIV-positive women.
Hotonu OE; Hussey J; Basta MS; Wadehra V; Cross P; Schmid ML
Cytopathology; 2010 Apr; 21(2):116-9. PubMed ID: 19843141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Design and methods of the evaluation of an HPV-based cervical cancer screening strategy in Mexico: The Morelos HPV Study.
Flores Y; Shah K; Lazcano E; Hernández M; Bishai D; Ferris DG; Lörincz A; Hernández P; Salmerón J;
Salud Publica Mex; 2002; 44(4):335-44. PubMed ID: 12216521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Analysis of inadequate cervical smears using Shewhart control charts.
Harrison WN; Mohammed MA; Wall MK; Marshall TP
BMC Public Health; 2004 Jun; 4():25. PubMed ID: 15225351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Screening history of cervical cancers in Emilia-Romagna, Italy: defining priorities to improve cervical cancer screening.
Rossi PG; Caroli S; Mancini S; de' Bianchi PS; Finarelli AC; Naldoni C; Bucchi L; Falcini F;
Eur J Cancer Prev; 2015 Mar; 24(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 24787379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Molecular detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia and cervical carcinoma by microsatellite analysis of Papanicolaou smears.
Rha SH; Dong SM; Jen J; Nicol T; Sidransky D
Int J Cancer; 2001 Aug; 93(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 11433409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Previous Papanicolaou and Hybrid Capture 2 human papillomavirus testing results of 5699 women with histologically diagnosed cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2/3.
Wu T; Chen X; Zheng B; Li J; Xie F; Ding X; Zeng Z; Zhao C
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2019; 8(4):206-211. PubMed ID: 31272603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cytology versus HPV testing for cervical cancer screening in the general population.
Koliopoulos G; Nyaga VN; Santesso N; Bryant A; Martin-Hirsch PP; Mustafa RA; Schünemann H; Paraskevaidis E; Arbyn M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Aug; 8(8):CD008587. PubMed ID: 28796882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]