These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9640432)

  • 61. The role of forgetting rate in producing a benefit of expanded over equal spaced retrieval in young and older adults.
    Maddox GB; Balota DA; Coane JH; Duchek JM
    Psychol Aging; 2011 Sep; 26(3):661-70. PubMed ID: 21463056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. The spacing effect stands up to big data.
    Kim ASN; Wong-Kee-You AMB; Wiseheart M; Rosenbaum RS
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Aug; 51(4):1485-1497. PubMed ID: 30623389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. The role of retrieval during study: Evidence of reminding from self-paced study time.
    McKinley GL; Ross BH; Benjamin AS
    Mem Cognit; 2019 Jul; 47(5):877-892. PubMed ID: 30725375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Examining the contributions of desirable difficulty and reminding to the spacing effect.
    Maddox GB; Pyc MA; Kauffman ZS; Gatewood JD; Schonhoff AM
    Mem Cognit; 2018 Nov; 46(8):1376-1388. PubMed ID: 30047090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Do students think that difficult or valuable materials should be restudied sooner rather than later?
    Cohen MS; Yan VX; Halamish V; Bjork RA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Nov; 39(6):1682-96. PubMed ID: 23565792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Modeling list-strength and spacing effects using version 3 of the retrieving effectively from memory (REM.3) model and its superimposition-of-similar-images assumption.
    Ensor TM; Surprenant AM; Neath I
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):4-21. PubMed ID: 31898291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Very similar spacing-effect patterns in very different learning/practice domains.
    Kornmeier J; Spitzer M; Sosic-Vasic Z
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(3):e90656. PubMed ID: 24609081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Reliable retrieval is intrinsically rewarding: Recency, item difficulty, study session memory, and subjective confidence predict satisfaction in word-pair recall.
    Holm L; Wells M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(10):e0292866. PubMed ID: 37856440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Verbal learning strategies in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Faglioni P; Bertolani L; Botti C; Merelli E
    Cortex; 2000 Apr; 36(2):243-63. PubMed ID: 10815709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The spacing effect in the learning of word pairs.
    Shaughnessy JJ; Zimmerman J; Underwood BJ
    Mem Cognit; 1974 Jul; 2(4):742-8. PubMed ID: 24203749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. The spacing effect in intentional and incidental free recall by children and adults: Limits on the automaticity hypothesis.
    Toppino TC; Fearnow-Kenney MD; Kiepert MH; Teremula AC
    Mem Cognit; 2009 Apr; 37(3):316-25. PubMed ID: 19246346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Behavioral characterization of individual olfactory memory retrieval in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Chabaud MA; Preat T; Kaiser L
    Front Behav Neurosci; 2010; 4():192. PubMed ID: 21258642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Spacing effects on implicit picture memory.
    Kitao N
    Percept Mot Skills; 1998 Apr; 86(2):396-8. PubMed ID: 9638739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. [Self-reference effect on automatic and intentional memory].
    Horiuchi T; Fujita T
    Shinrigaku Kenkyu; 2001 Jun; 72(2):121-7. PubMed ID: 11544913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. A retrieved context account of spacing and repetition effects in free recall.
    Siegel LL; Kahana MJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 May; 40(3):755-64. PubMed ID: 24564545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Persistence of the spacing effect in free recall under varying incidental learning conditions.
    Shaughnessy JJ
    Mem Cognit; 1976 Jul; 4(4):369-77. PubMed ID: 21287377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. The spacing effect in the free recall of homogeneous lists: present and accounted for.
    Toppino TC; Hara Y; Hackman J
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jun; 30(4):601-6. PubMed ID: 12184561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Forgetting: trace erosion or retrieval failure?
    Shiffrin RM
    Science; 1970 Jun; 168(3939):1601-3. PubMed ID: 5420546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Going beyond the spacing effect: Does it matter how time on a task is distributed?
    Murphy DH; Bjork RA; Bjork EL
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2023 May; 76(5):1131-1154. PubMed ID: 35786148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Effects of spaced versus massed training in function learning.
    McDaniel MA; Fadler CL; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Sep; 39(5):1417-32. PubMed ID: 23565787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.