448 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 9640917)
1. [How many X-ray examinations do patients tolerate? The National Institute of Radiation Protection's conclusions on the level of knowledge].
Leitz W; Hellström G; Holm LE
Lakartidningen; 1998 May; 95(21):2456-8. PubMed ID: 9640917
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Unnecessary imaging and radiation risk: the perfect storm for radiologists.
Cascade PN
J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Oct; 1(10):709-11. PubMed ID: 17411687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The meaning of low dose and low dose-rate.
Wakeford R; Tawn EJ
J Radiol Prot; 2010 Mar; 30(1):1-3. PubMed ID: 20234068
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Do new studies justify a re-evaluation of the risks of low-dose radiation?].
Axelson O
Lakartidningen; 1990 Aug; 87(32-33):2481-5. PubMed ID: 2398762
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. [More strict Swedish rules on radiation protection. New directives from the EU for health care].
Leitz W; Hellström G; Holm LE
Lakartidningen; 1998 May; 95(21):2459-62. PubMed ID: 9640918
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Ionizing radiation. The question of responsible use: Pandora's box revisited.
Soares DP; Gilligan P
West Indian Med J; 2004 Mar; 53(2):118-21. PubMed ID: 15199724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Risk assessment in diagnostic radiation dosimetry].
Fridrich R
Schweiz Med Wochenschr; 1991 Nov; 121(44):1595-600. PubMed ID: 1947956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Caution: Not seeing may be believing.
Balter S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Nov; 76(6):835. PubMed ID: 21104773
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. [Estimating patient dosage in radiologic examinations. Effective doses of the most frequent roentgen examinations].
Keske U; Hierholzer J; Neumann K; Cordes M; Venz S; Amthauer H; Matschke S; Felix R
Radiologe; 1995 Mar; 35(3):162-70. PubMed ID: 7761592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low levels of ionising radiation may cause harm.
J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):333-5. PubMed ID: 16312035
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [X-ray examinations in Norway--optimized use of radiation and radiation protection].
Olerud HM
Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Apr; 119(9):1322-5. PubMed ID: 10327857
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Epidemiology. Radiation dangerous even at lowest doses.
Kaiser J
Science; 2005 Jul; 309(5732):233. PubMed ID: 16002592
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Radiation hormesis--a remedy for fear.
Jaworowski Z
Hum Exp Toxicol; 2010 Apr; 29(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 20332170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Dose quantities in radiation protection and their limitations.
Dietze G; Menzel HG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2004; 112(4):457-63. PubMed ID: 15623879
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: detriment versus hormesis. Part 1. Dose responses of cells and tissues.
Feinendegen LE; Pollycove M
J Nucl Med; 2001 Jul; 42(7):17N-27N. PubMed ID: 11441881
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. [Risk of radiation exposure in X-ray examination of the thorax. German Central Committee for the Control of Tuberculosis (DZK)].
Konietzko N; Jung H; Hering KG; Schmidt T;
Pneumologie; 2001 Feb; 55(2):57-71. PubMed ID: 11268886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Current epidemiological evidence regarding the health effects of low-dose ionizing radiation. Implications for radiation protection, public health and forensic medicine].
Manzoli L; Romano F; Schioppa F; D'Ovidio C; Lodi V; Pirone GM
Ig Sanita Pubbl; 2004; 60(1-2):81-102. PubMed ID: 15213763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Biologic responses to low doses of ionizing radiation: adaptive response versus bystander effect.
Adelstein SJ
J Nucl Med; 2003 Jan; 44(1):125; author reply 125-6. PubMed ID: 12515886
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Biological consequences and health risks of low-level exposure to ionizing radiation: commentary on the workshop.
Feinendegen LE; Brooks AL; Morgan WF
Health Phys; 2011 Mar; 100(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 21285724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comments on 'Increasing film-focus distance (FFD) reduces radiation dose for X-ray examinations' by P.C. Brennan, S. McDonnell and D. O'Leary.
Huda W; Ogden KM; Brennan PC; O'Leary D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 113(4):453-5. PubMed ID: 15769801
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
